Next Article in Journal
Study of Low-Velocity Impact Behavior of Hybrid Fiber-Reinforced Metal Laminates
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural and Synthetic Polymers for Biomedical and Environmental Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Modification of Collagen/Sodium Alginate-Based Biomedical Materials and Their Characteristics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solvent Swelling-Induced Halogenation of Butyl Rubber Using Polychlorinated N-Alkanes: Structure and Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Applicability of Electron-Beam and Hybrid Plasmas for Polyethylene Terephthalate Processing to Obtain Hydrophilic and Biocompatible Surfaces

1
Joint Institute for High Temperatures of Russian Academy of Sciences, Izhorskaya st. 13 Bd. 2, 125412 Moscow, Russia
2
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kosygina st. 4, 119334 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Electronic Devices and Materials, Ivanovo State University of Chemistry and Technology, Sheremetevskiy Prospect 7, 153000 Ivanovo, Russia
4
TVEL JSC, Kashirskoye Shosse 49, 115409 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2024, 16(2), 172; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16020172
Submission received: 26 November 2023 / Revised: 21 December 2023 / Accepted: 4 January 2024 / Published: 6 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biopolymer Composites for Biomedicine Applications)

Abstract

:
The applicability of beam-plasma chemical reactors generating cold hybrid plasma for the production of noncytotoxic polymeric surfaces with high hydrophilicity and good biocompatibility with human fibroblast culture and human red blood cells was studied. Oxygen hybrid plasma was excited by the joint action of a continuous scanning electron beam and a capacity-coupled RF-gas discharge. Experiments showed that hybrid plasma treatment caused polar oxygen-containing functional group formation in the surface layer of poly (ethylene terephthalate) films. No thermal or radiative damage in tested polymer samples was found. The plasma-modified polymers turned out to be noncytotoxic and revealed good biocompatibility with human fibroblasts BJ-5ta as well as lower hemolytic activity than untreated poly (ethylene terephthalate). Experiments also demonstrated that no phenomena caused by the electrostatic charging of polymers occur in hybrid plasma because the electron beam component of hybrid plasma eliminates the item charge when it is treated. The electron beam can effectively control the reaction volume geometry as well as the fluxes of active plasma particles falling on the item surface. This provides new approaches to the production of abruptly structured patterns or smooth gradients of functionalities on a plane and 3D polymeric items of complicated geometry.

1. Introduction

Over the past decade, organic polymers have gained great importance as advanced materials for biochemical laboratory techniques, medical diagnostics, drug delivery systems, biotechnological procedures, and the fabrication of medical implants [1,2]. So considerable popularity of polymers is due to their remarkable physicochemical parameters, namely low density, high elasticity and specific strength, corrosion resistance, long-term durability, resistance against chemicals and/or abrasion etc. [1,2,3,4]. For example, nowadays polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and its derivatives are the most commonly used fibres in commercial vascular prostheses [5]. Other PET applications are sutures, heart valves, surgical meshes, scaffolds, urinary and bloodstream catheters [6].
However, despite the valuable bulk properties mentioned above, PET has low surface free energy, leading to poor wettability and poor adhesion in contact with living cells, which can cause damage to human tissues [5,6]. Therefore, to improve the hydrophilic properties of the polymeric surface and to increase its biocompatibility modification and additional functionalization are often required.
Technologies based on non-thermal plasmas (NTPs) have many applications, including electrical device microfabrication, biomedicine, dentistry, agriculture, ozone generation, chemical synthesis, materials engineering, coating, disease therapy, and the degradation of hazardous pollutants in the environment. A detailed and comprehensive review of the recent advances in NTPs can be found in [7]. NTPs can be operated at or around body temperature (not higher than 40 °C) and are termed cold plasma [8]. In most cases, cold plasmas are non-equilibrium because temperatures of plasma electrons are much higher than those of ions and neutral particles.
Biomedical applications of NTPs especially of cold plasmas have been actively studied since the end of the first decade of the 2000s. Nowadays, the field of plasma medicine includes several applications of NTPs in biology and medicine: sterilization, disinfection, and decontamination, plasma-aided wound healing, plasma dentistry, cancer therapy (so-called “plasma oncology”), plasma pharmacology, and plasma treatment of implants for biocompatibility improvement [8,9].
Polymeric materials surface modification low-pressure and atmospheric pressure NTPs are frequently considered [10,11,12], since they offer several major advantages over conventional methods like mechanical abrasion, wet chemical cleaning, etching, etc. By hydrophilic or hydrophobic groups insert the plasma-stimulated surface activation changes the surface energy and the water wettability of polymers, affecting their adhesive interface bonding [12,13], specific active molecules binding [14], integration with living tissues [10,11,15] and antibacterial properties [9,16].
For instance, the positive effects of polymeric surfaces NTP treatment were demonstrated in culturing human smooth muscle cells, bone marrow stromal cells, hepatocytes, fibroblasts and many other cell types [15,17]. Thus, plasma-modified hydrophilic polymers are a perspective for tissue engineering as well as clinical applications and optimization of implant surfaces [18].
NTP-processing of organic polymer has been the most thoroughly studied for corona, radiofrequency (RF), microwave, and low-pressure direct-current discharge effects [15,19,20,21,22]. Electron-beam plasma (EBP) reactors, generating large volumes of cold plasma by the injection of an electron beam (EB) into a gaseous medium could also be a promising alternative to gas discharge [23,24]. Under typical conditions (EB power Nb < 1 kW, fore vacuum gas pressure 1 < Pm < 10 kPa and moderate electron energies Eb < 100 keV) the EBP contains chemically active particles in super-equilibrium concentrations even at low, e.g., room, temperatures. Due to this fact, the EBP-reactors are extremely effective for modification of high molecular weight organic substances destructible when overheated [23,24]. Besides, the polymer EBP treatment is a dry, clean, and very fast process requiring minimal chemical consumption.
When the EB and RF discharge interact simultaneously with a plasma-generating medium, the so-called hybrid plasma (HP) is produced [23,24]. This combination of the EBP and RF discharge can be a perspective for polymer functionalization. The main HP-reactors advantages are as follows:
  • The reaction volume is uniform and doesn’t contract with an increase of the plasma generating gas pressure to values at which the RF discharge is filamentary or does not glow at all;
  • The EB attracts RF discharge and controls its location at the surface of the polymeric substrate as well as fluxes of neutral active particles that are produced by RF discharge and are mainly responsible for the wettability increase and the improvement of bioactivity of polymers.
The combination of EBs with microwave plasma has been used for gas cleaning [25] and for the volatile organic compound decomposition [26]. However, plasma–chemical processing of polymeric materials, using the HP is not well studied though the HP has extremely high chemical activity even at room temperatures due to its unique composition (e.g., molecules, atoms, radicals, and ions in stable and excited states, plasma electrons and electrons of the injected beam) and properties.
The present study aimed to compare the poly (ethylene terephthalate) films surface morphology, chemical composition, and wettability as well as their biocompatibility before and after treatment by cold plasma of three types, namely RF discharge, the EBP, and hybrid plasma.
To characterize changes in PET properties due to plasma chemical modification, several analytical techniques were applied [27]. The chemical composition of modified PET was characterized by spectroscopic techniques commonly used in polymer analysis, namely the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Since the morphology of polymeric surfaces has a strong impact on their functional properties, it was analyzed by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The acquired wettability of PET films was evaluated by the sessile drop method. Moreover, the bioproperties, i.e., cytotoxicity, protein adsorption, and hemocompatibility of plasma-modified PET were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. Polymeric Materials

All experiments were carried out with plane PET samples (films produced by the “Polimer-Teknika” company, Vladimir, Russia) 5 × 5 mm in size and thickness of 70 µm. Before plasma chemical treatment the samples were successively cleaned with deionized water (three times for 10 min) in an ultrasonic bath.

2.1.2. Cell Culture Materials

Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Biolot, St. Petersburg, Russia); 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrasolium bromide (MTT) and Mowiol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); 96% ethanol (Chimmed, Moscow, Russia); Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA); fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA); 0.9% saline (PanEco, Moscow, Russia); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Amreso, Solon, OH, USA); 0.02% EDTA; 0.05% trypsin solutions (Gibco, Waltham, MA, USA); and gentamycin (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) were used for the experiments with cell cultures. BCA protein assay kit, lysozyme (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), BSA, and bovine fibrinogen (type I-S) (Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, MA, USA). Blood collection tubes (Vacuette, Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria).

2.2. Characterization of Plasma-Modified PET Surface

2.2.1. Atomic Force Microscopy

The atomic force microscopy (AFM) surface study was performed with the Veeco Dimension V apparatus (Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY, USA) in contact mode. Scanning was carried out at a frequency of 0.8–1.01 Hz, with a resolution of 256 × 256 and 512 × 512 points. The obtained images were processed by the NanoScope Software, v1.40r1.

2.2.2. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

The PET samples were analyzed by the Fourier transform IR attenuated total internal reflection (ATR) spectroscopy using a Nicolet Avatar 360 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The ATR element was a zinc selenide crystal with a 12-fold reflection and a reflection angle of 45°. The signal accumulation mode was experimentally selected based on the results of 32 scans. The resolution was 2 cm−1. The spectra were recorded in a wavenumber (ν) range of 1400–4000 cm−1 and interpreted in accordance with [28,29,30,31].

2.2.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy

The chemical composition of polymer surfaces was studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a Thermo Scientific Theta Probe spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with monochromatic AlKα radiation (1486.6 eV). The spectrometer energy scale was calibrated at the Au4f7/2 line with a binding energy of 84.0 eV. The XPS spectra were interpreted in accordance with [32,33,34]. The XPS data were processed using the ThermoAvantage software, version 5 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) by Gaussian–Lorentzian functions after subtraction of a Shirley background. The Gaussian full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 1.5 eV was established before peak fitting.

2.2.4. Contact Angle and Surface Free Energy (SFE) Measurements

The contact angles with deionized water (θW) or diiodomethane (θDM) (Sigma-Aldrich, Schnelldorf, Germany) were measured by the sessile drop method with the optical contact angle-measurer CAM 101 (KSV Instruments, Espoo, Finland). All measurements were carried out immediately after plasma modification at room temperature and fixed at 45% relative humidity. The SFE (γtot) and its polar (γpol, deionized water) and dispersive (γdisp, diiodomethane) components were calculated by the Owens-Wendt method [35].

2.3. Cell Culture and Cytotoxic Activity Analysis

The immortalized human fibroblasts BJ-5ta cell line was maintained in 25 cm2 polystyrene flasks in the DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and gentamycin (50 µg/mL) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. The cells were replated using a trypsin-EDTA solution twice per week.
To assess the cytotoxic activity and biocompatibility, the cells were seeded into 24-well plates (Corning TCT surface treatment, Lowell, MA, USA) (10,000 cells per well in 1 mL of DMEM) onto the treated side of PET film (10 mm in diameter) samples and incubated under standard conditions for 96 h. Cell photos were taken at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of incubation by a Nikon Diaphot phase contrast microscope at 40× magnification equipped with a Levenhuk M1400Plus camera (Levenhuk, Saint Petersburg, Russia). The standard MTT assay was applied in order to evaluate cell survival [36]. Cells were seeded onto the samples within 2 h after the treatment. Blank culture and sterile non-modified PET were the negative and positive controls, respectively. 4 h before the end of incubation, each well was supplemented with 250 μL of MTT solution (1 mg/mL) in the serum-free DMEM and incubated for 4 h. Next, the medium was aspirated, and precipitated formazan crystals in each well were dissolved in 500 μL of DMSO. Then 100 μL of supernatant from each well was transferred for analysis into a 96-well plate and the absorbance was measured at wavelength λ = 540 nm with a plate photometer (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The cell survival was calculated as (Equation (1)):
Cell survival = (Aexperimental/Acontrol) × 100%
where Aexperimental is the optical density of supernatant obtained from fibroblasts incubated with original or plasma-modified PET; Acontrol is the optical density of supernatant obtained from fibroblasts incubated only in the culture medium.
Survival curve plotting, IC50 values calculation, and statistical analysis were performed in Excel 16.0 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and OriginPro (version 2020b, OriginLab Corp., Northampton, MA, USA). We applied an unpaired two-tailed t-test for the group comparison.

2.3.1. Cell Adhesion Assay

The BJ-5ta cells were serum-deprived for 2 h, and, after detachment with trypsin-EDTA solution and double washing with DMEM, were seeded into 24-well plates (60,000 cells per well in 1 mL of serum-free DMEM containing 0.1% BSA) onto the treated side of PET film (10 mm in diameter) samples and incubated under standard conditions.
Cells were allowed to adhere to the surface for 40 min, followed by four intensive washes with DMEM using a plate orbital shaker to remove non-adhered cells. After the final wash, the cells were supplemented with 1 mL of 10% FBS containing DMEM and left for 4h for complete adhesion to the membranes. Next, the standard MTT assay was performed as described in Section 2.3.

2.3.2. Protein Adsorption

The protein adsorption was determined by incubating the membranes (10 mm) in 1 mL of 0.4 mg/mL protein solution in PBS pH 7.4 (BSA, fibrinogen, or lysozyme for 24 h at 37 °C under mild shaking. The protein concentration left in the supernatant was determined by applying a standard BCA protein assay after the membrane removal.

2.3.3. Hemolysis Assay

The hemocompatibility of the membranes was evaluated using fresh human blood taken from healthy donors. All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study.
The blood sample was collected in tubes treated with EDTA. The red blood cell (RBC) fraction was isolated by centrifugation at 700× g for 10 min and washed three times with sterile PBS. Finally, the 5% v/v erythrocyte suspension was prepared in PBS.
0.785 cm2 polymer membranes were placed in a 24-well plate and supplemented with 0.25 mL of PBS. Then, 0.25 mL of RBC suspension was added to each well. Triton X-100 (1% v/v solution in PBS) and PBS were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The plate was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and centrifuged at 700× g for 10 min. 0.1 mL of supernatant from each well was transferred to the 96-well plate to measure the absorbance at 540 nm using a plate reader. The fraction of lyzed erythrocytes was calculated according to the following (Equation (2)):
Hemolysis % = (AsampleAneg.control)/(Apos.controleAneg.control) × 100%

2.4. Plasma Chemical Treatment of PET

Polymeric samples were processed in the special beam-plasma chemical reactor of hybrid type, which enables to generation of sufficiently stable large-size volumes of RF discharge, electron-beam, and hybrid plasmas. Some economical estimations and power efficiency of electron-beam reactor were given in the Appendix A.
Special preliminary experiments were carried out to find the processing conditions at which the sample surface temperature did not exceed the acceptable range (about 40 °C) and polymer thermal damage did not occur. The revealed parameters are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 1a illustrates the polymer modification experiments arrangement. The HP was excited by joint action of the continuous EB and capacity coupled RF-gas discharge (13.56 MHz) on pure (without additives of any other gases) oxygen of research-grade (producer—Scientific Industrial Center of NRC “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow, Russia). Oxygen was blown into the reaction chamber with the flow rate G varying within the range of 200–1000 sccm through the inlet pipeline and then staked out by the vacuum pump through the outlet pipeline (Figure 1a). As a result, the dynamic vacuum in the pressure range Pm = 200–650 Pa could be obtained. The pressure control system based on the PID regulator (circled in the figure with a dotted line) automatically held the preset value Pm balancing the gas intake and outtake using the butterfly valve on the vacuum pipeline and the flow controller on the inlet pipeline, respectively.
Mass-spectrometer HALO 201-RC (Hiden Analytical, Warrington, UK) connected to the outlet pipeline continuously monitored the gas composition filling the reaction chamber. Thus, fresh oxygen continuously injected into the reaction chamber forms a pure plasma-generating medium and prevents it from possible pollution by gaseous sample destruction products.
Oxygen has been chosen for experiments because it is widely used as an effective gas source to form oxygen-containing functional groups on various polymer surfaces [37,38,39]. In our previous studies [23] the oxygen HP was found to produce extra oxygen-containing groups in other polymers when the experiments were carried out in conditions under consideration now. Authors of these papers attributed the surface modification effect to the action of chemically active oxygen particles (primarily atomic oxygen and ozone) effectively generated in cold non-equilibrium plasmas. We will consider the HP composition and some other properties below.
The scanning EB (Eb = 30 kV and Ib = 1–5 mA) was injected through the mesh-type active electrode into the gap of the planar double-electrode RF discharge system. Electromagnetic deflecting coils operated by the electron-beam sweep controller EBS-530 (Inficon Inc., East Syracuse, NY, USA) scanned the EB in the {x, y} plane. The PET films to be treated were placed in the gap between the active RF-electrode and the flat passive electrode that usually was grounded. In experiments on the EBP modification, the RF discharge was switched off and vice versa the EB was not injected into the reaction volume when the polymers were treated in simple RF discharge.
The gas flow rate and the pressure of plasma-generating gas were automatically controlled by mass flow and pressure controllers (MKS Instruments, Milpitas, CA, USA). The sample heating was remotely monitored with an Optris LS IR-pyrometer (Optris, Berlin, Germany). The pyrometer was equipped with a light filter transparent for IR but absorbing visible optical radiation to separate long wavelength thermal radiation of the polymeric materials (wells and samples) from their luminescence in plasmas. The required process temperature was maintained constant and adjusted by the electron beam current Ib.
PET samples were placed at the wells bottom of 24-well plates (Corning TCT surface treatment, Lowell, MA, USA) for plasma chemical treatment (Figure 1b). Immediately after the plasma modification, the plates with the treated PET samples were packed in sterile plastic bags (NPO Vinar, Moscow, Russia).

2.5. Physical Aspects of PET Modification in Beam-Plasma Chemical Reactor

From the point of view of physics and technology, the experiment arrangement was as follows. The plasma cloud should be excited inside a well in a dielectric container to generate fluxes of chemically active particles able to controllably modify the cavity’s inner surface without thermal damage it. The modification effect was supposed to depend on the flux intensity and particle activity. The cold plasma of oxygen is a source of such particles, and the HP generation technique is effective in forming intensive particle fluxes. When an EB and gas discharge jointly ionize and excite plasma generating medium their combination realizes advantages of each of them: the beam is an effective ionizer whereas the gas discharge produces excited particles better than the beam.
The beam was proven to control the plasma cloud location [24]: the cloud is concentrated around the beam and follows it when the beam scans in space. Thus, the plasma cloud controlled by the beam can be considered like a “plasma brush” and creates complicated patterns on samples with distributed cavities. Besides, the beam transports heavy plasma particles into the cavity: being generated outside the cavity by the gas discharge they can be delivered into the cavity by the EB. Thus, the RF discharge is unnecessary inside the cavity, which avoids several well-known problems of discharge plasma interaction with solid surfaces including sheath. The problem of the electrostatic charging of dielectrics by electron beam irradiation can be settled by gas pressure increase. Our experiments with the EBP near the surface have shown that the potential of any body surrounded with or contacting the EBP does not exceed floating plasma potential (about several V) if gas pressure reaches 200–650 Pa (depending on the plasma generating gas composition) [24].
Figure 1b illustrates the HP-processing procedure of the Corning well plate with PET samples. The sample illuminates homogeneously and no dark zones or electrical breakdowns are detected. Nevertheless, some information about plasmas characteristics and properties is worth to be given.
To describe and analyze the EBP and HP generation and their interaction with the solid body the following physical model was used. Originally a thin monochromatic electron beam is injected into still oxygen bulk. The beam trajectories have some initial angular spread. Electrons take part in multiple collisions both elastic and inelastic. As a result, the beam is scattered and decelerated, losing energy from the original value to the thermal one. This forms the degradation spectrum of electrons. Gas molecules are ionized and excited by electron impact in inelastic collisions producing numerous secondary electrons and heavy particles both charged and neutral.
Electron energy distribution functions in the EBP and, consequently, in the HP are non-Maxwellian and have a long tail of electrons of intermediate energy. Partially decelerated original electrons together with energetic secondary ones are able to take part in other inelastic processes again and again. Note that the electron energy distribution function of gas discharge is also non-Maxwellian and also has a tail but is significantly shorter than that in the EBP. Finally, the original beam power transforms into thermal energy or radiates.
When the EB is injected into a closed gas volume filling a container the scattered electrons heat the container wall by bombardment and then the wall heats the gas by heat transfer. As a result, some spatial profiles of temperature, gas density, plasma particle concentrations and local release of the beam power form are formed. Heavy plasma particles move toward the container wall due to the concentration and thermal diffusions (neutral particles) or ambipolar diffusion (electrons and positive ions). Reaching the wall they can modify container wall material chemically. Being bombarded directly by fast electrons the wall can accumulate the electrostatic charge. From this point of view, it is particle fluxes that are the most important quantities.
Figure 2 presents fluxes (q) of electrons, atomic oxygen O, oxygen ions O2+ and excited oxygen O2(a) falling on the cylindrical container bottom at a different distance from its centre. The EB was injected along the container axis and the injection point was at a distance of 150 mm from the bottom.
The fluxes were calculated in numerical simulations. There are two approaches to computer HP simulation: (a) the EB is supposed to be injected into the preliminary excited plasma of RF discharge, and (b) an external electromagnetic field is superimposed on the EBP volume. The first approach demands information about gas discharge. Many authors carried out simulations for conditions close to those of our experiments [40,41]. Usually, numerous plasma processes are taken into account. The second approach seems to be simpler because the sufficiently restricted number of reactions (about 40) are necessary for oxygen HP description. Moreover, for qualitative description with acceptable accuracy, only six reactions may be used (Table 2). Also we calculated longitudinal profiles of gas and container wall temperature, fluxes of plasma particles and release of the beam power to predict possible modification effect for various zones of the container wall and estimate risks of sample thermal damage. Simulations were carried out by Monte-Carlo method on the basis of continues deceleration model for all electrons of degradation spectrum excluding thermolized ones. The example of this simulation is presented in Figure 3 for model dielectric cavity 18 mm in diameter. The beam characteristics and gas pressure indicated in caption for Figure 3 correspond with real conditions of experiments under consideration data of which are useful to verify physical model and simulation algorithms used.
Simulations and preliminary physical experiments gave information to optimize treatment procedures for real samples. In particular, the best distances z from the beam injection window to the well front plane at selected oxygen pressures Pm and beam currents Ib were found to protect samples from overheating and to avoid electric charge accumulation. Under optimized conditions, no thermal damages and effects caused by electrostatic phenomena were observed. In real experiments, the sample temperature was continuously monitored by an optical pyrometer. Since it detects not only sample thermal radiation but also sample visible luminescence (Figure 1b) special light filter transparent for IR radiation was recommended for usage. Contact temperature measurements were difficult because thermocouples and thermo resistor signals were dramatically distorted by noises from the gas discharge and, to some lesser extent, from the EB. Being carried out after the treatment stopped the contact temperature measurements were useful for optical pyrometer calibration. As to electrostatic phenomena, it was found that at plasma pressures higher than 200 Pa polymers were fully discharged via the EBP.

3. Results

3.1. Morphology and Chemical Composition of the NTPs-Modified Polymers

Figure 4 shows typical large-scale AFM images (50 µm × 50 µm) of the original and plasma-modified PET surfaces where considerable topographical changes caused by the plasma exposure can be observed. Being etched by the highly reactive oxygen plasma species the HP-treated polymeric surface acquired an uneven granular structure (Figure 4d) whereas the EBP-modified PET remained smooth and uniform (Figure 4c). The latter effect can be explained by the fact that high-energy electrons of the EB provoke the crosslinking of polymeric chains which results in some smoothing of the surface texture.
AFM images were analyzed in terms of average surface roughness (Ra). The roughness values are 16.10 ± 3.1 nm for original PET and 20 ± 2.0 nm, 10,9 ± 2.5 nm and 38.8 ± 2.7 nm for PET modified in RF discharge, EBP and HP, respectively.
The elemental composition and relative concentrations of C and O atoms on the PET surface before and after plasma chemical treatment are presented in Table 3. The C/O ratio in the PET surface layer decreased from 3.56 (control sample) to 1.61, 1.47, and 1.46 after modification by the RF discharge, electron, and hybrid plasmas, respectively. Thus, the significant rise of the oxygen content with the simultaneous reduction of carbon concentration was revealed in all plasma-modified PET films.
In the untreated PET sample, the C1sA peak (attributed to carbon atoms of the aromatic ring) accounted for about 59% of the total amount of carbon, while the C1sB and C1sD peaks (which characterize carbon atoms in the methylene and ester groups) accounted for 8.43% and 8.37%, respectively. After plasma processing, the area of the C1sA peak decreased, whereas the C1sB and C1sD peaks areas increased in all PET samples. These data suggest the formation of additional oxygen-containing functional groups on polymer surfaces due to plasma chemical treatment. The intensity of oxidation depended on the type of NTP applied for the PETs modification: the most significant effect was observed after PET treatment in the RF discharge and hybrid plasmas.
Figure 5 presents the C1s XPS-spectra of PET films before and after their treatment in NTPs. Again, three characteristic peaks with binding energies (BE) of 283.57 eV (C–C bonds of the aromatic ring), 285.13 eV (C–O) and 287.54 eV (O=C–O) were identified in the original PET sample. After the HP-plasma modification the area of the C1sD (O–C=O) peak, which is attributed to the carboxyl groups, increased by 35% while the area of the C1sA peak associated with methyl and methylene carbons decreased by 25% in comparison with the original sample. At the same time, the rise of the peaks corresponding to the C–O (O1sA) and C=O (O1sB) groups was found in the O1s XPS spectra of the plasma-treated PET with the most significant changes after RF discharge and HP action (Figure 6). Besides, an additional peak (peak C1sC in Figure 5b–d), that may belong to the carbon of the C=O functional group [32,33,34], is observed in XPS spectra of plasma-modified PET.
Thus, the XPS results indicate that the carbon bonds on the polymer surface are destroyed during the plasma treatment and then they react with the oxygen species (atomic oxygen, OH radical, etc.) produced in plasma, forming carbonyl and carboxyl groups.
The results of the FTIR spectroscopy confirm the formation of oxygen-containing functional groups. The most significant changes in the IR spectra of PET films were found in the wavenumber range of ν = 3500–3100 cm−1, in which a broad absorption band appeared, characterizing the stretching vibrations of O–H bonds. An increase in the intensity of the peak at ν = 1686 cm−1 (C=O stretching vibrations in carboxyl groups) was also noted. A higher concentration of these groups was detected in HP-treated films (Table 4).
However, reduced intensity of the absorption band at ν = 1712 cm−1 attributed to C=O stretching vibrations of ester groups which are parts of the elementary units of PET chain was observed in plasma-treated samples. The explanation for such a decrease may be the destruction of PET chains together with the formation of vinyl derivatives of the esters (CO–O–C=C) [42]. The data presented in Table 4 also suggest the formation of double bounds due to the plasma chemical treatment that was more intensive after PET modification in EBP and HP.

3.2. Hydrophilic Properties of NTPs-Modified PET Films

Contact angles θW and θDM measured with water and diiodomethane, respectively, the calculated values of the total surface energy γtot, as well as its polar γpol and dispersive γdisp components are given in Table 5. The increases in γtot from 42.7 mJ/m2 to 70.4 mJ/m2 and 71.6 mJ/m2 were achieved after PET modification in the RF discharge plasma and HP, respectively. The polar component became more effective while the contribution of γdisp decreased, suggesting the formation of oxygen-containing polar chemical groups at the plasma-modified PET surfaces that was consistent with the FTIR and the XPS data.

3.3. The Effects of NTPs-Modified PET Films on Cell Attachment and Growth

The hybrid plasma treatment resulted in oxygen-containing polar hydroxyl, carbonyl, and carboxyl groups’ formation on the PET sample’s surface. We also observed surface free energy increase and wettability enchantment up to 1.5–2 times in comparison with the original PET. The changes in the chemical composition of the polymeric surface together with the increment of its hydrophilic properties result in the improvement of compatibility of the plasma-modified PET films with living cells and tissues.
The biological tests of the plasma-treated PET samples were performed on the BJ-5ta line of immortalized human fibroblasts cell culture, which is commonly used for assessment of the cytotoxicity and biocompatibility of the new materials.
The microscopic images of the fibroblasts spreading on the PET samples modified in oxygen hybrid plasma can be found in Figure 7. The cells exhibited a flattened morphology and good adherence to the polymeric surface. The normal cell morphology and similar proliferation patterns among all samples evidenced a lack of pronounced cytotoxicity and negative effects of the treated PET surfaces on cell culture.
We confirmed the lack of pronounced cytotoxic effect of PET modified by oxygen hybrid plasma by MTT assay. The observed survival rates in wells containing the samples were lower than in control wells during the whole incubation, which could be explained by special treatment promoting cell adhesion, while a significant part of the wells bottom contained PET films was covered. This survival difference increased with the incubation period prolongation.
After 48 h, according unpaired two-tailed t-test, we observed a significant difference between untreated PET and other samples (untreated PET vs. RF discharge 25 W p = 0.0034; untreated PET vs treated in RF discharge 35 W p = 0.0073; untreated PET vs. EBP-modification p = 0.0002), except treatment in hybrid plasma, according to unpaired t-test. After 72 h, only the EBP demonstrated significantly lower cell survival compared with untreated PET (p = 0.0019). After 96, surprisingly, only the EBP sample revealed significantly higher survival compared with untreated PET (p = 0.0482) (Figure 8).
After 96 h of incubation, all samples demonstrated comparable survival results—total survival was in the 65–75% range of control. Overall, the data obtained demonstrated a lack of pronounced cytotoxicity and high biocompatibility of plasma-treated PET samples.

3.3.1. Cell Adhesion Assay

Interactions between cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM), including polymer membranes, can be a prerequisite for the design of new biocompatible artificial materials, the development of new monitoring techniques and cell survival in new microenvironments [43]. Thus, considering relatively interesting results of survival analysis after direct cells seeding onto membranes, further, we examined the cell adhesion at PET membranes subjected to various types of treatment during the first 40 min after seeding (Figure 9).
We did not notice any notable differences during the microscopic examination of the cell culture (Figure 9a). However, in contrast with the initial results of the MTT test obtained after direct seeding the cells onto membranes—the well washing revealed significant diversity in cell adhesion to plasma-treated membranes during the initial phase of incubation. The differences were considered significant (unpaired two-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction): untreated PET vs treatment in RF discharge (p < 0.0001); untreated PET vs EBP-treatment (p = 0.01); untreated PET vs treatment in hybrid plasma (p = 0.0013).

3.3.2. Protein Adsorption

Noticing the influence on the initial stages of cell adhesion, we evaluated protein adsorption on the membranes by applying indirect BCA analysis (Figure 10).
The intact PET membranes displayed reduced protein adsorption compared to plasma-treated samples. A significant difference was observed for RF discharge, EBP, and hybrid plasma-treated samples incubated in solutions of all tested proteins. We observed a lack of significant difference among treated samples (Figure 10).
The observed tendency of higher lysozyme absorption onto all samples is explained probably by electrostatic interactions of positively charged protein.

3.3.3. Hemolytic Activity

Next, we performed hemolytic activity analysis to evaluate the non-specific toxicity of the membranes. Generally, the hemolysis rate is described by HC50 value—the concentration of the drug or formulation causing 50% RBCs lysis upon 1 h exposure [44]. The samples characterized with a lysis rate of less than 5% are generally considered non-haematotoxic. In our case, it was impossible to evaluate mass-dependent hemolytic activity, so we adapted the conventional protocol and incubated plasma-treated or control membranes in the presence of RBCs.
The results presented in Table 6 evidence significantly higher untreated PET hemolytic activity in contrast with plasma-treated membranes with p-values less than 0.05. Probably, this effect can be explained by the pronounced hydrophobic properties of untreated PET surface, which are negated after treatment with plasma [45]. The RBCs membrane destruction is generally caused by the hydrophobic interactions between the hydrophobic groups of polymers and the lipid bilayer [46].

4. Discussion

It is well known that NTPs affect polymeric films in several ways, the most important of them are: (1) cleaning from organic impurities (2) etching by removal of material from the surface and (3) producing functional groups because of surface reactions stimulated by chemically active plasma particles. The etching process alters the surface topography enhancing its roughness, which has been detected after PET modification HP-modification by AFM. These changes lead to the polymer wettability improvement without modifying its surface texture. On the other hand, atomic oxygen, other neutral oxygen-containing radicals, and numerous exited particles formed in the HP react with polymers to produce a variety of polar functional groups (such as –OH, –COH, C=O, and –COOH), which causes the rise in the surface hydrophilicity as well. The results of XPS analysis suggest the significant oxidation of PET polymeric chains during the NTPs treatment, which was the most intensive in the case of RF discharge and hybrid plasmas.
The major reactive species responsible for the incorporation of oxygen-containing polar groups into the polymer surface are believed to be atomic oxygen [9,10,47]. These neutral active oxygen particles react with the dangling bonds on the PET surface which are formed due to C–C bond breaking and lead to the oxidation of the treated surface. The dominant initial step can be the hydrogen abstraction by the O atom of organics RH, i.e., RH  ±  O  →  •R  ±  OH [48]. The possible following reactions are given in Figure 11 [49].
Both etching and plasma-stimulated oxidation result synergistically in the polymer hydrophilicity increase, which promotes stable cell adhesion and healthy cellular functioning. The higher roughness formed after plasma processing also provides the focal adhesion points for cell interactions with the polymeric surface. At the same time, the oxygen-containing groups control the essential protein adsorption from the cell surface onto the PET thus enhancing the bonding of cell integrins with the polymeric substrate [50]. In vitro analysis revealed good biocompatibility of the treated samples. Visually the cell morphology on the surfaces was similar among all samples and control cells seeded onto tissue-treated polystyrene plate bottom. Th survival assay revealed some differences increased during incubation—after 48 h incubation cells cultured onto plasma-treated surfaces demonstrated 75–85% survival (95% for untreated PET); after 72 h survival rates were in the 75–90% range; and after 96 h we observed 65–75% survival in contrast with control cells. The observed differences in survival among samples could be explained by a range of factors, for instance, slight variation in the chemical structure of poly(ethylene terephthalate samples which were used for NTPs processing or micro-heterogeneity (non-genetic cell to cell variability) of fibroblasts [51,52]. Therefore, plasma-treated PET samples demonstrated good overall biocompatibility notwithstanding the tendency to slower cell expansion over the polymeric surface.
Despite implicit results after direct cells seeding onto membranes—further analysis revealed some differences: short initial incubation followed by washing revealed a statistically significant difference between cells’ attachment degree onto untreated PET and plasma-treated samples—the cells attached better onto treated membranes. Adsorption analysis displayed better protein binding efficacy of plasma-treated membranes in contrast with untreated PET. Finally, the plasma-treated membranes revealed lower hemolytic activity. The last in vitro results were most probably explained by surface charge contributed by the plasma treatment—the charged surface displayed better protein adsorption and higher cell adhesion properties evidencing well potential biocompatibility of these samples and prospects of cold-plasma application in polymer surface treatment.
At the same time, using the EB it is possible to precisely localize the RF discharge on the desirable zone of the polymeric sample surface, maintain the set temperature in this zone, and control plasma chemical functionalization processes. As a result, areas within which physical, chemical, and functional properties change either abruptly (structured patterns) or smoothly (gradient materials) can be formed on the surface. Experimental evidence confirming these options’ feasibility can be found in our papers [23,24].

5. Conclusions

The applicability of beam-plasma chemical reactors generating cold hybrid plasma for the production of noncytotoxic polymeric surfaces with high hydrophilicity and good biocompatibility with human fibroblast culture and human red blood cells was studied. Oxygen hybrid plasma was exited by joint action of a continuous scanning electron beam and a capacity-coupled RF-gas discharge (13.56 MHz). Hybrid plasma treatment caused polar oxygen-containing functional groups formation in the surface layer of poly(ethylene terephthalate) films. No thermal or radiative damage in tested polymer samples were found. The plasma-modified polymers turned out to be noncytotoxic and revealed good biocompatibility with human fibroblasts BJ-5ta as well as lower hemolytic activity than untreated poly(ethylene terephthalate).
Experiments demonstrated that in hybrid plasma the problem of the electrostatic charging inherent in polymer treatments in gas discharges can be settled because the electron beam component of hybrid plasma eliminates the charge accumulated on polymeric film. Moreover, the electron beam characteristics, namely scanning mode and power, can instantly and independently control the reaction volume geometry as well as concentrations of active plasma particles. As a result, the RF discharge can be accurately localized at the desirable zone of the polymeric surface or even inside cavities. This provides new approaches to the production of abruptly structured patterns or smooth gradients of functionalities on a plane and 3D polymeric items of complicated geometry without special masks or covers conventionally used in gas-discharge plasma technologies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.V., M.V., E.N., A.A. and A.U.; methodology, T.V., M.V., E.N., N.Y. and T.S.; formal analysis, N.Y., M.M. and M.C.; investigation, T.V., E.N., M.V., T.S., M.M., M.C., M.S. and N.Y.; resources, M.V., T.V. and E.N.; data curation, T.V., E.N., N.Y. and T.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.V., E.N. and N.Y.; writing—review and editing, M.V., A.A. and A.U.; visualization, T.V., N.Y., T.S., M.M., M.C. and M.S.; supervision, T.V., E.N. and N.Y.; project administration, M.V.; funding acquisition, A.A. and A.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 21-79-30062 and TVEL JSC (Nonnuclear Industry R&D Department) as an industrial partner.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All subjects gave their informed consent for inclusion before they participated in the study (hemolytic activity analysis). The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of N.M. Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of Russian Academy of Sciences (project No. 119, approval date 26 September 2023).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

The hybrid reactor consists of three main parts, namely the Beam-Plasma Generator, RF-plasma generator, and the reaction chamber. Some supporting systems are required for the reactor operation. The reaction chambers were designed for various powder loadings, but all of them only slightly differ from available chambers conventionally used in electron-beam or plasma technologies by specific inner facilities and/or outer systems. The HP-Plasma Generator is a unique device; it is compact, light, and simple for maintenance; the basic plasma generator configuration and its operation characteristics are described in [23,24]. Table A1 illustrates mass characteristics, availability, and specific maintenance of the main parts of the industrial beam-plasma generator 6 kW in power. The estimated HP Generator cost in the basic configuration is about USD 200,000.
Operating costs do not exceed values typical for conventional electron beam and cold plasma technologies equipment, e.g., lithography or cleaning etc. of moderate power.
Table A1. The availability components of the HP plasma chemical reactor and its maintenance features.
Table A1. The availability components of the HP plasma chemical reactor and its maintenance features.
Beam-Plasma Generator PartEquipment Purpose and Unit VersionWeight, kgProduct
Manufacturer
Maintenance
Electron gunThermionic cathode LaB6≈10Numerous manufacturers of welding electron guns, e.g., PROGRESS Company,
Izhevsk, Russia
A lifetime of more than 100 h under normal conditions
High voltage power sourceHigh voltage generators of positive or negative polarity≈15Spellman High Voltage Electronics Corporation, Hauppauge, NY, USANo maintenance
Beam control unitsVersion 1. Controller of the beam power (semi-automatic)≈20TUSUR University,
Tomsk, Russia
No maintenance
Version 2
Controllers of the beam power and beam scanning (automatic)
≈25TUSUR University,
Tomsk, Russia
No maintenance
Injection windowVersion 1.
Gas-dynamic window
≈2Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology,
Moscow, Russia
Lifetime of about 100 h
Version 2.
Gas-dynamic window with a differential pumping stage
≈5Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow,
Russia
Lifetime of about 200 h
High vacuum systemVersion 1. Diffusion pump in combination with oil-sealed pump≈35Numerous producers, e.g., Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USAMinimal maintenance
Version 2.
Turbo molecular pump with dry scroll pump
≈35Numerous manufacturers, e.g., STP Maglev with XDS, Edwards Vacuum, Burgess Hill, UKMinimal maintenance
The reaction chamber and its inner equipmentLow vacuum chamber and sample holders≈30Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow,
Russia
Periodic cleaning by conventional means
Low vacuum systemSupport of pressure in the reaction chamber≈20Numerous producers, e.g.,
Edwards Vacuum, Burgess Hill, UK
Minimal maintenance
Gas feeding systemPlasma generation gas supply≈5Numerous producers, e.g., MKS Instruments, Milpitas, CA, USANo maintenance
RF-generator and electrode systemGas discharge generation≈10Numerous producers, e.g., MKS Instruments, Milpitas, CA, USAPeriodic electrode system cleaning by conventional means
Total weight ≈150

References

  1. Nazeer, N.; Ahmed, M. Polymers in medicine. In Polymer Science and Nanotechnology: Fundamentals and Applications; Ravin, N., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 281–323. [Google Scholar]
  2. Braybrook, J.H.; Hall, L.D. Organic polymer surfaces for use in medicine: Their formation, modification, characterisation and application. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1990, 15, 715–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jaberi, J.; Gambrell, K.; Tiwana, P.; Madden, C.; Finn, R. Longterm clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 71, e81–e88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, X.; He, L.; Zhu, B.; Li, J.; Li, J. Advances in polymeric materials for dental applications. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 807–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajendran, S.; Anand, S.C. Woven textiles for medical applications. In Woven Textiles: Principles, Technologies and Applications (The Textile Institute Book Series), 2nd ed.; Gandhi, K., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2019; pp. 441–470. [Google Scholar]
  6. Çaykara, T.; Sande, M.G.; Azoia, N.; Rodrigues, L.R.; Silva, C.J. Exploring the potential of polyethylene terephthalate in the design of antibacterial surfaces. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 2020, 209, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mumtaz, S.; Khan, R.; Rana, J.N.; Javed, R.; Iqbal, M.; Choi, E.H.; Han, I. Review on the biomedical and environmental applications of nonthermal plasma. Catalysts 2023, 13, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Braný, D.; Dvorská, D.; Halašová, E.; Škovierová, H. Cold atmospheric plasma: A powerful tool for modern medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Laroussi, M. Plasma medicine: A brief introduction. Plasma 2018, 1, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. van Deynse, A.; Morent, R.; de Geyter, N. Surface modification of polymers using atmospheric pressure cold plasma technology. In Polymer Science: Research Advances, Practical Applications and Educational Aspects; Méndez-Vilas, A., Solano, A., Eds.; Formatex Research Center: Badajoz, Spain, 2016; pp. 506–516. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sui, S.; Li, L.; Shen, J.; Ni, G.; Xie, H.; Lin, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, J.; Duan, W. Plasma treatment of polymethyl methacrylate to improve surface hydrophilicity and antifouling performance. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2021, 61, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Koodaryan, R.; Hafezeqoran, A. Surface modification of dental polymers by plasma treatment: A review. Biomed. Pharmacol. J. 2016, 9, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Taraballi, F.; Zanini, S.; Lupo, C.; Panseri, S.; Cunha, C.; Riccardi, C.; Marcacci, M.; Campione, M.; Cipolla, L. Amino and carboxyl plasma functionalization of collagen films for tissue engineering applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 394, 590–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Soygun, K.; Tamam, E.; Dogan, A.; Keskin, S. Does the plasma application time affect the tensile bond strength between PMMA and a silicone-based denture liner? Niger J. Clin. Pract. 2020, 23, 1266–1273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Rezaei, F.; Shokri, B.; Sharifian, M. Atmospheric-pressure DBD plasma-assisted surface modification of polymethyl methacrylate: A study on cell growth/proliferation and antibacterial properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 360 Pt B, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ozge, O.; Nesrin, H. Modification of poly(methyl methacrylate) surfaces with oxygen, nitrogen and argon plasma. J. Biomater. Tissue Eng. 2014, 4, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jacobs, T.; Morent, R.; De Geyter, N.; Dubruel, P.; Leys, C. Plasma surface modification of biomedical polymers: Influence on cell-material interaction. Plasma Chem. Plasma Proc. 2012, 32, 1039–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, H.; Sun, M.; Zhou, P.; Pan, L.; Wu, C. Silk fibroins modify the atmospheric low temperature plasma-treated poly (3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) film for the application of cardiovascular tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 2010, 3, 1146–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duarte, B.S.; Panariello, H.D. Comprehensive biomedical applications of low temperature plasmas. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2020, 693, 108560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mangindaan, D.; Kuo, W.H.; Kurniawan, H.; Wang, M.J. Creation of biofunctionalized plasma polymerized allylamine gradients. J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys. 2013, 51, 1361–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nageswaran, G.; Sureshkumar, A.; Neogi, S. RF plasma-treated polymers for biomedical applications. Curr. Sci. 2008, 94, 1478–1486. [Google Scholar]
  22. Michelmore, A.; Whittle, J.D.; Bradley, J.W.; Short, R.D. Where physics meets chemistry: Thin film deposition from reactive plasmas. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2016, 10, 441–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vasiliev, M.; Vasilieva, T. Beam plasmas: Materials production. In Encyclopedia of Plasma Technology; Shohet, J.L., Ed.; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Inc.: Boka Ralton, FL, USA, 2016; pp. 152–166. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vasiliev, M.; Vasilieva, T.; Hein, A.M. Hybrid plasma chemical reactors for bio-polymers processing. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2019, 52, 335202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Koch, M. Design, construction and testing of hybrid plasma reactor for gas processing. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hadidi, K.; Cohn, D.R.; Vitale, S.; Bromberg, L. Economic study of the tunable electron beam plasma reactor for volatile organic compound treatment. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 1999, 49, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yang, R. Analytical Methods for Polymer Characterization, 2nd ed.; CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Inc.: Boka Ralton, FL, USA, 2018; 318p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Maliszewska, I.; Gazińska, M.; Łojkowski, M.; Choińska, E.; Nowinski, D.; Czapka, T.; Święszkowski, W. On the effect of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma treatment on the properties of PET film. Polymers 2023, 15, 4289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. El-Saftawy, A.A.; Elfalaky, A.; Ragheb, M.S.; Zakhary, S.G. Electron beam induced surface modifications of PET film. Rad. Phys. Chem. 2014, 102, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, N.L.; Qureshi, A.; Shah, N.; Rakshit, A.K.; Mukherjee, S.; Tripathi, A.; Avasthi, D.K. Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate by plasma treatment. Rad. Meas. 2005, 40, 746–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Nakanishi, K. Infrared Absorption Spectroscopy; Nankodo: Tokyo, Japan, 1962; 233p. [Google Scholar]
  32. Vandencasteele, N.; Reniers, F. Plasma-modified polymer surfaces: Characterization using XPS. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2010, 178–179, 394–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gonzalez, E., II; Barankin, M.D.; Guschl, P.C.; Hicks, R.F. Surface activation of poly(methyl methacrylate) via remote atmospheric pressure plasma. Plasma Process. Polym. 2010, 7, 482–493. [Google Scholar]
  34. Nisol, B.; Reniers, F.J. Challenges in the characterization of plasma polymers using XPS. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 2015, 200, 311–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Owens, D.K.; Wendt, R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969, 13, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mossman, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Meth. 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, X.; Bao, J.; Li, K.; Argyle, M.D.; Gang Tan, G.; Adidharma, H.; Zhang, K.; Fan, M.; Ning, P. Advance in using plasma technology for modification or fabrication of carbon-based materials and their applications in environmental, material, and energy fields. Adv. Funct. Mat. 2021, 31, 2006287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mrsic, I.; Bäuerle, T.; Ulitzsch, S.; Lorenz, G.; Rebner, K.; Kandelbauer, A.; Chassé, T. Oxygen plasma surface treatment of polymer films—Pellethane 55DE and EPR-g-VTMS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 536, 147782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Esmail, A.; Pereira, J.R.; Zoio, P.; Silvestre, S.; Menda, U.D.; Sevrin, C.; Grandfils, C.; Fortunato, E.; Reis, M.A.M.; Henriques, C.; et al. Oxygen plasma treated-electrospun polyhydroxyalkanoate scaffolds for hydrophilicity improvement and cell adhesion. Polymers 2021, 13, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bronold, F.X.; Matyash, K.; Tskhakaya, D.; Schneider, R.; Fehske, H. Radio-frequency discharges in oxygen: I. Particle-based modeling. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 6583–6592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Derzsi, A.; Laeur, T.; Booth, J.-P.; Korolov, I.; Donkó, Z. Experimental and simulation study of a capacitively coupled oxygen discharge driven by tailored voltage waveforms. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2016, 25, 015004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bellamy, L.J. The Infra-Red Spectra of Complex Molecules; Methuen & Co.: London, UK, 1954; 323p. [Google Scholar]
  43. Morokov, E.; Yabbarov, N.; Sedush, N.; Bogachenkov, A.; Malykhin, A.; Demina, V.; Azarkevich, P.; Nikolskay, E.; Chirkina, M.; Sokol, M. Observation of discrepancy between the degradation of polymer scaffolds in vitro and in vivo according to high-resolution ultrasound technique. Eur. Polym. J. 2023, 195, 112248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sokol, M.; Yabbarov, N.; Mollaeva, M.; Chirkina, M.; Mollaev, M.; Zabolotsky, A.; Kuznetsov, S.; Nikolskaya, E. Alpha-fetoprotein mediated targeting of polymeric nanoparticles to treat solid tumors. Nanomedicine 2022, 17, 1217–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pranantyo, D.; Xu, L.Q.; Hou, Z.; Kang, E.-T.; Chan-Park, M.B. Increasing bacterial affinity and cytocompatibility with four-arm star glycopolymers and antimicrobial α-polylysine. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 3364–3373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Takahashi, H.; Caputo, G.A.; Vemparala, S.; Kuroda, K. Synthetic random copolymers as a molecular platform to mimic host-defense antimicrobial peptides. Bioconjug. Chem. 2017, 28, 1340–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Azeem, M.; Javed, A.; Morikawa, H.; Noman, M.T.; Khan, M.Q.; Shahid, M.; Wiener, J. Hydrophilization of polyester textiles by nonthermal plasma. Autex Res. J. 2019, 21, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Ishikawa, K.; Mozetič, M.; Tsutsumi, T.; Kondo, H.; Sekine, M.; Hori, M. Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) surface modification by VUV and neutral active species in remote oxygen or hydrogen plasmas. Plasma Process. Polym. 2019, 16, 1800175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Klebert, S.; Tilajka, S.; Romanszki, L.; Mohai, M.; Csiszar, E.; Karoly, Z. Degradation phenomena on atmospheric air plasma treatment of polyester fabrics. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 22, 100826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Majhy, B.; Priyadarshini, P.; Sen, A.K. Effect of surface energy and roughness on cell adhesion and growth—facile surface modification for enhanced cell culture. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 15467–15476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gentili, P.L.; Perez-Mercader, J. Quantitative estimation of chemical microheterogeneity through the determination of fuzzy entropy. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 950769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Giuliani, G.; Vumbaca, S.; Fuoco, C.; Gargioli, C.; Giorda, E.; Massacci, G.; Palma, A.; Reggio, A.; Riccio, F.; Rosina, M.; et al. SCA-1 micro-heterogeneity in the fate decision of dystrophic fibro/adipogenic progenitors. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Principle scheme of the experimental setup (a) and samples treatment procedure (b): 1—electron gun, 2—high-vacuum chamber, 3—electron beam, 4—injection window, 5—injection window, 6—electron-beam plasma, 7—active mesh-type RF-electrode, 8—RF-plasma, 9—polymer container, 10—working chamber, 11—polymer samples, 12—container holder (grounded passive RF-electrode), 13—PID-regulator.
Figure 1. Principle scheme of the experimental setup (a) and samples treatment procedure (b): 1—electron gun, 2—high-vacuum chamber, 3—electron beam, 4—injection window, 5—injection window, 6—electron-beam plasma, 7—active mesh-type RF-electrode, 8—RF-plasma, 9—polymer container, 10—working chamber, 11—polymer samples, 12—container holder (grounded passive RF-electrode), 13—PID-regulator.
Polymers 16 00172 g001
Figure 2. Fluxes (q) of electrons, atomic oxygen O, oxygen ions O2+ and excited oxygen O2(a) falling on the cylindrical container bottom: Eb = 30 keV, Ib = 10 mA, Pm = 650 Pa; r—radial distance from the bottom center.
Figure 2. Fluxes (q) of electrons, atomic oxygen O, oxygen ions O2+ and excited oxygen O2(a) falling on the cylindrical container bottom: Eb = 30 keV, Ib = 10 mA, Pm = 650 Pa; r—radial distance from the bottom center.
Polymers 16 00172 g002
Figure 3. Longitudinal profiles of the beam power release (Q) in the model cavity (polystyrene tube) 18 mm in diameter: Eb = 30 keV, Ib = 2 mA, Pm = 650 Pa.
Figure 3. Longitudinal profiles of the beam power release (Q) in the model cavity (polystyrene tube) 18 mm in diameter: Eb = 30 keV, Ib = 2 mA, Pm = 650 Pa.
Polymers 16 00172 g003
Figure 4. AFM images of (a) original PET surface and PET surfaces treated in (b) RF-discharge plasma; (c) Electron-beam plasma; and (d) Hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 4. AFM images of (a) original PET surface and PET surfaces treated in (b) RF-discharge plasma; (c) Electron-beam plasma; and (d) Hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g004
Figure 5. C1s XPS spectra of PET samples before and after plasma treatment: (a) untreated PET; (b) PET treated in RF discharge plasma; (c) PET treated in electron-beam plasma; (d) PET treated in hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 5. C1s XPS spectra of PET samples before and after plasma treatment: (a) untreated PET; (b) PET treated in RF discharge plasma; (c) PET treated in electron-beam plasma; (d) PET treated in hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g005
Figure 6. O1s XPS spectra of PET samples before and after plasma treatment: (a) untreated PET; (b) PET treated in RF discharge plasma; (c) PET treated in electron-beam plasma; (d) PET treated in hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 6. O1s XPS spectra of PET samples before and after plasma treatment: (a) untreated PET; (b) PET treated in RF discharge plasma; (c) PET treated in electron-beam plasma; (d) PET treated in hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g006
Figure 7. The optical microscopic images of the BJ-5ta fibroblasts after 24 (a), 48 (b), 72 (c) and 96 h (d) of their incubation on: (control)—polystyrene plate bottom; (untreated)—untreated PET; (1)—RF discharge (25 W); (1a)—RF discharge; (2)—EBP; (3)—hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 7. The optical microscopic images of the BJ-5ta fibroblasts after 24 (a), 48 (b), 72 (c) and 96 h (d) of their incubation on: (control)—polystyrene plate bottom; (untreated)—untreated PET; (1)—RF discharge (25 W); (1a)—RF discharge; (2)—EBP; (3)—hybrid plasma. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g007
Figure 8. Mean values of the BJ-5ta fibroblast survival cultivated on PET films during 48, 72 and 96 h in 24-well culture plates in comparison with the average survival value of control cells cultured in polystyrene tissue traded wells in the absence of PET samples. n = 5. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 25 W or 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 8. Mean values of the BJ-5ta fibroblast survival cultivated on PET films during 48, 72 and 96 h in 24-well culture plates in comparison with the average survival value of control cells cultured in polystyrene tissue traded wells in the absence of PET samples. n = 5. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 25 W or 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g008
Figure 9. BJ-5ta cells attachment to differentially treated PET membranes. (a)—representative images of cell culture just before MTT analysis; (b)—relative survival values of cell culture seeded onto different PET membranes. * p < 0.01, n = 8. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 9. BJ-5ta cells attachment to differentially treated PET membranes. (a)—representative images of cell culture just before MTT analysis; (b)—relative survival values of cell culture seeded onto different PET membranes. * p < 0.01, n = 8. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g009
Figure 10. Protein adsorption was evaluated by BCA assay. * p < 0.01, n = 8. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Figure 10. Protein adsorption was evaluated by BCA assay. * p < 0.01, n = 8. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Polymers 16 00172 g010
Figure 11. The possible reactions occurring during PET plasma chemical treatment [49].
Figure 11. The possible reactions occurring during PET plasma chemical treatment [49].
Polymers 16 00172 g011
Table 1. The treatment conditions are used for polymer modification in various types of NTPs.
Table 1. The treatment conditions are used for polymer modification in various types of NTPs.
ParameterValue
Accelerating voltage (U)30 kV
EB current (Ib)1–5 mA
Electron beam scanning modeConcentric circles with a diameter of 10 cm
Electron beam scanning speed140–150 ms
Spin speed of electron beam shape rotation20–25 rpm
Plasma-generating gas pressure (Pm)200–650 Pa
Oxygen flow rate (G)200–1000 sccm
RF discharge power (NRF)25–35 W
Treatment time (τ)5 min
Material temperature (Ts)40 °C
Table 2. The kinetic scheme is used for the calculation of neutral particle concentration in the oxygen HP.
Table 2. The kinetic scheme is used for the calculation of neutral particle concentration in the oxygen HP.
ReactionThe Energy (eV (*)) or the Rate Constant (cm3 × s−1 or cm6 × s−1 (**))
eb + O2 → eb + O + O 20.2 (*)
eb + O2 → eb + O2(a) 23.1 (*)
O + 2O2 → O3 + O2 6.9 × 10−34 (300/Tg)1.25 (**)
O + O3 → O2 + O2 2 × 10−11 exp (−2300/Tg)
O + O + O2 → 2O26.7 × 10−33 (300/Tg)0.63 (**)
O3 + O2 → O + 2O21.65 × 10−9 exp (−11,400/Tg)
Table 3. C1s and O1s binding energies and surface elemental composition of PET before and after plasma chemical treatment.
Table 3. C1s and O1s binding energies and surface elemental composition of PET before and after plasma chemical treatment.
PeakOriginal PETPET Treated in
RF Discharge
PET Treated in
EBP
PET Treated in
Hybrid Plasma
BE, eVContent of the Element,
%
BE, eVContent of the Element,
%
BE, eVContent of the Element,
%
BE, eVContent of the Element,
%
C1sA283.5759.19283.5523.19283.4925.72283.5124.81
B285.138.43285.1713.08284.697.71284.897.44
C285.946.80285.5713.18285.6312.40
D287.548.37287.6016.30287.5615.20287.6015.09
O1sA530.7113.92530.8818.96530.8719.23530.8419.89
B532.327.44532.1821.67532.1818.97532.1820.38
BE—binding energy. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Table 4. Ratios of the IR-absorbances (D) at different wavenumbers for PET before and after plasma chemical treatment.
Table 4. Ratios of the IR-absorbances (D) at different wavenumbers for PET before and after plasma chemical treatment.
SampleD3250/D1500
O–H
D1776/D1500
CO–O–C=C
D1712/D1500
C=O
(Ehter Group)
D1686/D1500
C=O
(Carboxyl Group)
D1608/D1500
C=C
Original PET0.1400.0407.1722.0680.528
PET treated in
RF discharge
0.1060.0926.7782.6440.633
PET treated in
EBP
0.2430.2547.2153.5191.068
PET treated in
hybrid plasma
0.2670.1927.2482.8520.877
The peak with ν = 1500 cm−1 corresponds to the maximum absorption band attributed to C–H vibrations in the benzene ring. Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Table 5. Contact angles, SFE, and SFE components for PET films before and after modification in oxygen NTPs.
Table 5. Contact angles, SFE, and SFE components for PET films before and after modification in oxygen NTPs.
SampleθW, °θDM, °γpol, mJ/m2γdisp, mJ/m2γtot, mJ/m2
Control80.6 ± 0.240.2 ± 1.53.338.442.7
RF discharge treated27.3 ± 0.636.3 ± 1.830.140.270.4
EBP-treated44.9 ± 0.142.8 ± 0.319.145.864.9
HP-treated26.8 ± 0.436.8 ± 0.230.341.371.6
The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. All the results are significant compared to control (untreated polymer) (p < 0.05). Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Table 6. Hemolytic activity of different PET membranes.
Table 6. Hemolytic activity of different PET membranes.
SampleHemolytic Activity, %
Tritox X-100, 1%
PBS
100
1.7 ± 0.5
Untreated PET, ~3.14 cm27.1 ± 0.6 *
RF discharge 35 W, ~3.14 cm23.2 ± 0.6
EBP, ~3.14 cm23.9 ± 0.9
Hybrid plasma, ~3.14 cm24.2 ± 0.7
* p < 0.05, n = 8 Treatment conditions: U = 30 kV, Ib = 2 mA, NRF = 35 W, EB scanning speed = 150 ms, EB spin speed = 25 rpm, Pm = 650 Pa, τ = 5 min.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vasilieva, T.; Nikolskaya, E.; Vasiliev, M.; Mollaeva, M.; Chirkina, M.; Sokol, M.; Yabbarov, N.; Shikova, T.; Abramov, A.; Ugryumov, A. Applicability of Electron-Beam and Hybrid Plasmas for Polyethylene Terephthalate Processing to Obtain Hydrophilic and Biocompatible Surfaces. Polymers 2024, 16, 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16020172

AMA Style

Vasilieva T, Nikolskaya E, Vasiliev M, Mollaeva M, Chirkina M, Sokol M, Yabbarov N, Shikova T, Abramov A, Ugryumov A. Applicability of Electron-Beam and Hybrid Plasmas for Polyethylene Terephthalate Processing to Obtain Hydrophilic and Biocompatible Surfaces. Polymers. 2024; 16(2):172. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16020172

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vasilieva, Tatiana, Elena Nikolskaya, Michael Vasiliev, Mariia Mollaeva, Margarita Chirkina, Maria Sokol, Nikita Yabbarov, Tatiana Shikova, Artem Abramov, and Aleksandr Ugryumov. 2024. "Applicability of Electron-Beam and Hybrid Plasmas for Polyethylene Terephthalate Processing to Obtain Hydrophilic and Biocompatible Surfaces" Polymers 16, no. 2: 172. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym16020172

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop