Next Article in Journal
The Inclusion of Pigeon Pea Hay Improves the Quality of Giant Cactus Harvested at Different Times
Previous Article in Journal
Transcriptome Analysis of Seed in Dormancy and Dormancy Release State of Epimedium koreanum Nakai
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Yield and Quality of Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) Fruits Improved by Biodegradable Mulching Film in Two Different Regions of Southern Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Yield Response and Leaf Gas Exchange of Sicilian Wheat Landraces

by
Sebastiano Andrea Corinzia
*,
Paolo Caruso
,
Alessio Scandurra
,
Umberto Anastasi
,
Salvatore Luciano Cosentino
and
Giorgio Testa
Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Catania, Via Valdisavoia 5, 95123 Catania, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agronomy 2024, 14(5), 1038; https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051038
Submission received: 17 April 2024 / Revised: 7 May 2024 / Accepted: 9 May 2024 / Published: 13 May 2024

Abstract

:
Wheat landraces are traditional varieties that have evolved over generations in response to local environments and farming practices and therefore exhibit remarkable adaptability to challenging climatic conditions and low-input farming systems. While the suitability of Mediterranean landraces to non-optimal climatic conditions during anthesis and grain ripening stage have been previously assessed, the role of photosynthesis efficiency and stomatal control on this resilience remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between grain yield and the post-anthesis flag leaf gas exchanges of Sicilian wheat landraces under irrigated and rainfed conditions and to compare these traits to modern durum (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) and bread wheat (T. aestivum) varieties. Results indicate that wheat landraces respond to water availability similarly to modern varieties, reducing stomatal conductance by 26.8% and net photosynthesis by 18.1% under rainfed conditions, resulting in 10.6% lower grain yield compared to irrigated conditions. However, some landraces demonstrate comparable or even higher flag leaf net photosynthesis rates and lower transpiration levels, leading to higher yields in both rainfed and irrigated conditions, confirming their value as a source of gene pool for wheat breeding programs in drought-prone Mediterranean regions.

1. Introduction

Wheat landraces are traditional varieties that have evolved over many generations in response to the local environmental conditions and the selective pressure of the local farming system, leading to a high genetic diversity and local adaptation, unlike modern commercial varieties, which are bred for high uniformity and often consist of individual pure lines with low genetic variability [1,2]. These landraces have been selected under low-input farming systems, which has led to the conservation of traits that increase the suitability to under-optimal environmental and climatic conditions [3,4]. Among these traits are higher plant height, which increases the competitiveness against weeds [5,6], and the low susceptibility to drought, especially in landraces selected in semi-arid areas, mainly due to the deep root system [7,8,9,10] or reducing their cycle length to anthesis and therefore performing the grain filling phase under more favorable conditions [4].
During the last century, wheat landrace adoption by farmers decreased in favor of high-yielding commercial varieties, and therefore, the in situ and ex situ conservation of their gene pool is entrusted to custodian farmers and gene banks, respectively [2,11].
The gene pool of landraces is useful for wheat breeding programs that aim to improve the grain quality and resilience towards biotics (pathogens and pests) and abiotic stresses of modern wheat varieties [4,12,13].
Moreover there is a growing interest in these wheat landraces related to their appreciable technological features and sensory and nutraceutical properties, such as high fiber content, antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals [14,15].
Mediterranean wheat landraces could provide genetic traits to enhance grain yield in an environment characterized by non-optimal climatic conditions during the grain filling stage. Grain filling, and consequently grain yield, is sustained both by transient photosynthesis after anthesis and by the translocation of stored reserves accumulated before anthesis [16]. If the climatic condition during the grain filling phase is non-optimal, such as in the Mediterranean climates, where hot and dry conditions prevail in late spring, grain filling is mainly sustained by the translocation of stored reserves, since photosynthesis declines due to stomatal response [9,16]. Modern varieties have been found to have a higher photosynthesis rate than local landraces in favorable climatic conditions and high nitrogen input [17] and their grain yield has been found to be positively correlated with photosynthesis rate at different phenological stages [17,18,19].
Considering the broader spectra of climatic and agronomic conditions, modern varieties have not shown a higher rate of photosynthesis per unit leaf area than the open-pollinated populations or landraces from which they are derived [20]; in these cases, grain yield increased mainly as a result of improved harvest index [20,21] or as a result of higher total photosynthesis during the life of the plant due to the increase in leaf area, daily duration of photosynthesis, or leaf area duration [20].
Wheat grain yield is affected by limiting soil water availability. In this condition, the photosynthesis rate is reduced by the plant response to lower stomatal conductance with the aim of reducing water transpiration [19,22,23,24,25,26]. Sicilian wheat landraces have demonstrated to be particularly adapted to non-optimal climatic conditions during anthesis and grain ripening stage and low-input agronomical practices [27,28], while the role of photosynthesis efficiency or stomatal conductance in achieving these results has yet to be assessed.
The aim of the present work is to evaluate the relationship between grain yield and the post-anthesis flag leaf gas exchanges of Sicilian wheat landraces under irrigated and rainfed conditions and compare these traits to modern durum (Triticum turgidum subsp. durum) and bread wheat (T. aestivum) varieties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Field Trial

The field trial was carried out at the experimental farm of the University of Catania (37°24′ N., 15°03′ E., 10 m a.s.l.), in a representative area of Sicilian cereal farming, in a typical Xerofluvent soil with a preponderantly clayey texture, whose characteristics are listed in Table 1.
The experimental design was a split-plot design with three replicates. The irrigation was the experimental factor assigned to the main plots and had two levels: rainfed and 100% of maximum crop evapotranspiration (ETm) restoration during the period from the end of anthesis until the full seed ripening. The sub-plot factor was the genotype, with seventeen categories: twelve Sicilian landraces of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one landrace of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The durum wheat landraces were selected to provide an extensive representation of the genetic and morphological diversity among Sicilian durum wheat landraces [1,31]. Only one bread wheat landrace has been selected for this study because of the low diffusion and low productivity of bread wheat in the semi-arid Mediterranean regions [32]. Both durum wheat modern commercial varieties are well-adapted to the local environmental conditions and are proved to be high-yielding [33,34], while the bread wheat “Bologna” has been selected as a widespread Italian variety, despite its low suitability for the local conditions.
The sub-plot size was 1.25 × 8 m2. Irrigation was provided by a sprinkler irrigation system. Daily ETm was calculated according to:
ETm = ET0 × Kc
where ET0 is reference evapotranspiration (mm) and Kc is the crop coefficient for wheat according to [35]. Irrigation started on 3 May 2020 the first year and on 2 May 2021 the second year.
Sowing was carried out on 8 January 2020 during the first year and on 13 January 2021 during the second year with a target sowing density of 400 plants m−2.
The trial followed organic management. The fertilization was performed before sowing and just before the stem elongation phase, applying in total 80 kg ha−1 of N as organic fertilizer in pellet form with 7% of N and 13% of P2O5. Harvesting was carried out at physiological maturity (when the grain moisture content approaches 12%) on 6 July 2020 during the first year and on 2 July 2021 during the second year, collecting all the aboveground biomass in the experimental plots using a self-propelled combine harvester. The grain yield was calculated relating the grain dry weight to the unit area (Mg ha−1).

2.2. Measurements

Physiological measurements were carried out weekly from anthesis until full ripening, reaching a total of 5 dates of measurement in 2020 and 4 in 2021 during an interval of ±2 h from midday, avoiding cloud conditions when the photosynthetic photon flux was highly variable or below 1200 μmol m−2 s−1, on the flag leaf of two plants in each experimental plot. The physiological measurements were performed using the LCi-SD Portable Photosynthesis system (ADC BioScientific Ltd., Hoddesdon, UK), which measures net photosynthesis rate (A, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1), transpiration rate (E, mmol H2O m−2 s−1) and stomatal conductance (gs, mol H2O m−2 s−1) on the basis of CO2 and H2O gas exchange. Instantaneous water use efficiency (iWUE µmol CO2 mol−1 H2O) was calculated as the ratio of net photosynthesis and transpiration. Meteorological data (maximum temperature, mean temperature, minimum temperature, precipitation, solar incident radiation, maximum humidity, minimum humidity, mean wind speed) were measured hourly by a weather station connected to a data logger (CR10, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA), located 50 m from the experimental field.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The data were subjected to an analysis of variance (four-way ANOVA) to assess the effect of genotype, irrigation, days after sowing (DAS), and the interactions genotype × irrigation, genotype × DAS, irrigation × DAS, and genotype × irrigation × DAS on net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and instantaneous water use efficiency. The effect of genotype, irrigation, and year and the interactions genotype × irrigation on grain yield were assessed through a three-way ANOVA.
The year of the trial was considered as a random factor in the four-way and three-way ANOVA.
The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test residuals for normality. The Bartlett test was used to test homoscedasticity.
Fisher’s least square difference (LSD) procedure at a 95% confidence level was performed to compare pairwise the genotype and the genotype × irrigation interaction means. Correlation between variables was studied with the Pearson’s product-moment correlation test. All analyses were performed using the R CRAN software version 4.4.0 [36].

3. Results

3.1. Meteorological Trend

Thermal trends, precipitation, and reference evapotranspiration were typical of the semiarid Mediterranean environment during the duration of the experiment.
Mean air temperatures throughout growing seasons were slightly lower in 2020 than 2021; the monthly average daily mean temperature was 14.88 °C and 15.06 °C in 2020 and 2021, respectively, the monthly average daily minimum temperature was 9.28 °C and 9.48 °C in 2020 and 2021, respectively, lower than the long-term average of 10 °C, the monthly average daily maximum temperature was 20.98 °C and 21.11 °C in 2020 and 2021, respectively, both higher than the long-term average of 20.5 °C, although reference evapotranspiration was higher during the 2020 growing season (707.4 mm) than the 2021 growing season (660.1 mm), and both were higher than the long-term average (643.8 mm). Precipitation was higher during the period starting from October 2019 to July 2020 (588 mm) than the period starting from October 2020 to July 2021 (424 mm), while the long-term average is 544.1 mm (Figure 1).

3.2. Analysis of Variance

The main effects (genotype, irrigation, days after sowing) had a significant effect on net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and iWUE. The interaction genotype × irrigation had no significant effect on any variable. The interaction genotype × DAS had a significant effect on net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and iWUE. The interactions irrigation × DAS and genotype × irrigation × DAS had a significant effect only on transpiration rate (Table 2). Grain yield was significantly affected by genotype and irrigation. The year, considered as a random factor, had a significant effect on net photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, iWUE, and grain yield. The residual distribution was non-significantly different from the normal distribution for all the variables according to the Shapiro–Wilk test and the variance of all the variables was significantly homogeneous according to the Bartlett test.

3.3. Grain Yield

Irrigation input led to an increase in grain yield in 2020 and a stronger increment in 2021. Among the ancient populations, Margherito reached the highest grain yield during both years (3.1 Mg ha−1 in rainfed conditions and 3.4 Mg ha−1 in irrigated conditions), exceeding the productivity of the modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (Mongibello and Core) (Figure 2). The soft wheat variety Bologna had the lowest yield both in 2020 and 2021 due to its low suitability to the semiarid Mediterranean environment, due to the long growing season.
Grain yields were higher in 2020 than in 2021 (3.1 and 2.2 Mg ha−1, respectively) due to the higher precipitation during the period of October–May, before the differentiation of the irrigation factor. The difference in precipitation between the first and the second year led to a higher effect of irrigation on grain yield during the second year; the mean increase in grain yield due to irrigation was 5.06% in 2020 and 16.2% in 2021.

3.4. Leaf Gas Exchange

Irrigation caused an increase of 28.9% and 24.6% in stomatal conductance in 2020 and 2021, respectively (from 0.14 mol m−2 s−1 to 0.19 mol m−2 s−1 in 2020 and from 0.09 mol m−2 s−1 to 0.12 mol m−2 s−1 in 2021), which led to 17.4% and 18.8% increase in net assimilation rates in 2020 and 2021, respectively (from 10.6 µmol m−2 s−1 to 12.9 µmol m−2 s−1 in 2020 and from 8.4 µmol m−2 s−1 to 12.2 µmol m−2 s−1 in 2021). Transpiration rate increased by 18.8% and 4.1% in 2020 and 2021 under irrigated condition compared to rainfed condition (from 3.09 mmol m−2 s−1 to 3.79 mmol m−2 s−1 in 2020 and from 2.29 mmol m−2 s−1 to 2.40 mmol m−2 s−1 in 2021).
Among ancient landraces, “Realforte”, “Margherito”, and “Bidi” had higher than average stomatal conductance in 2020 both under rainfed and irrigated conditions (Figure 3). During 2021, the aforementioned landraces had stomatal conductance values close to average or slightly above (Figure 3). “Russello” showed higher than average stomatal conductance under irrigated condition during 2020 and 2021, but the values were lower or close to average under rainfed condition.
High stomatal conductance led to higher than average transpiration and net assimilation rates; “Realforte”, “Bidi”, and “Margherito” had the highest net assimilation and transpiration rates in 2020 under rainfed and irrigated conditions (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
The modern commercial bread wheat variety “Bologna” showed the highest net photosynthesis rate under irrigated condition considering the two-year average, while under rainfed condition, it showed a net photosynthesis rate higher than the average of the genotypes (Figure 4). Among the modern durum wheat varieties, “Core” showed higher than average net assimilation and transpiration rate in 2020 under irrigated and rainfed conditions, while the values were close to average in 2021.
Figure 4. Net assimilation rate (A, µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Figure 4. Net assimilation rate (A, µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Agronomy 14 01038 g004
Figure 5. Transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test. The effect of irrigation on iWUE was not statistically significant (Table 1); nevertheless, the highest iWUE values were achieved under irrigated conditions (Figure 6). IWUE values were higher in 2021 than in 2020 due to the lower transpiration rates.
Figure 5. Transpiration rate (E, mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test. The effect of irrigation on iWUE was not statistically significant (Table 1); nevertheless, the highest iWUE values were achieved under irrigated conditions (Figure 6). IWUE values were higher in 2021 than in 2020 due to the lower transpiration rates.
Agronomy 14 01038 g005
Figure 6. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol CO2 mmol−1 H2O) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The continuous black lines represent the mean iWUE values for 2020 and 2021.
Figure 6. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol CO2 mmol−1 H2O) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The continuous black lines represent the mean iWUE values for 2020 and 2021.
Agronomy 14 01038 g006
The ancient landraces “Realforte”, “Margherito”, “Bidi”, and “Russello Ibleo” had the highest iWUE values under irrigated conditions in both years. “Russello Ibleo” reached 4.1 and 3.9 µmol CO2 mol−1 H2O during the 2021 growing season under irrigated and rainfed condition, respectively, despite having a net photosyentesis rate just above average, due to the low transpiration rate.
The average iWUE among ancient landraces was higher than the average among modern varieties under rainfed conditions and lower than the average among modern varieties under irrigated conditions.
The relationship between net assimilation rate and grain yield has been studied for 16 genotypes (Figure 7), with the exclusion of “Bologna”, whose grain yield values were outside the interquartile range. Net assimilation rate and grain yield results were significantly correlated (p-value = 3.20 × 10−9) with a Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient of 0.659 (Figure 8).
A strong positive correlation has also been observed between grain yield and transpiration rate and between grain yield and stomatal conductance. Among gas exchange variables, net assimilation rate, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance were pairwise correlated, while instant water use efficiency was not significantly correlated with net photosynthesis rate and stomatal conductance and was negatively correlated with transpiration rate (Figure 8).
Stomatal conductance decreased during the period from anthesis until full ripening under both rainfed and irrigated conditions due to leaf senescence (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The decrease in stomatal conductance was faster in rainfed condition where soil moisture was depleted. Late ripening varieties (“Bidi”, “Bologna”, “Margherito”, “Timilia”, “Urria”) maintained a higher stomatal conductance during the late ripening stage under irrigated conditions.
The trend in stomatal conductance also affected the net assimilation rate trend, which showed a sharp decrease approaching the full ripening stage (Figure 11 and Figure 12). In irrigated condition, net assimilation rate stayed high until full ripening stage in late ripening varieties (“Bidi”, “Bologna”, “Margherito”, “Timilia”, “Urria”).
A similar trend was observed for the transpiration rate (Figure 13 and Figure 14), which decreased during the period from anthesis until full ripening due to the decreasing stomatal conductance in response to leaf senescence and soil moisture depletion in rainfed condition. The decrease in transpiration rate during late ripening was lower compared to the decrease in stomatal conductance due to the rising vapor pressure deficit, which has a positive effect on leaf transpiration.
The IWUE trend was mainly affected by phenological stage and poorly affected by the irrigation factor (Figure 15 and Figure 16). The lowest values of iWUE were reached at full ripening stage.

4. Discussion

Wheat landraces responded to the different levels of water availability in the soil similarly to modern wheat varieties, showing a lower stomatal conductance during the period from anthesis to seed ripening in rainfed condition, as a consequence of the reduced water availability. The reduction in the stomatal conductance limited the transpiration and therefore the water consumption of the crop, but also led to a reduction in the net photosynthesis rate. During the period from anthesis to seed ripening, stomatal conduction, transpiration, and net assimilation rate decreased in response to leaf senescence under both irrigated and rainfed conditions. The same decreasing trend has been observed by [33] in analogous conditions.
Few studies have compared the gas exchanges of wheat landraces and modern wheat varieties. Among these studies, [33] found the landrace “Russello” having lower net photosynthesis rate during the grain filling stage than the modern variety “Mongibello”, while the transpiration rate was higher, leading to a lower iWUE in open field conditions; under heat stress generated by a greenhouse, “Russello” achieved higher net photosynthesis rate and similar iWUE to “Mongibello”, confirming the adaptability of landraces to under-optimal environmental conditions.
A positive linear relation between net assimilation rate and grain yield has been found among the genotypes, considering both years under irrigated and rainfed conditions. As a consequence, the limited photosynthesis rate during the period from anthesis to seed ripening led to a lower grain yield in rainfed conditions than in irrigated conditions. Similar results have been reported by [19], who found wheat grain yield was consistently and positively associated with net photosynthetic rates during all phenological stages and in particular post-anthesis, and by [17], who found a positive linear relation between post-anthesis net assimilation rate and grain yield among modern cultivar and landraces. The same study reported lower net photosynthesis rate in wheat landraces compared to modern cultivars under favorable climatic conditions and high nitrogen input [17]. Another study by [18] found a weak correlation between pre-anthesis net assimilation rate and grain yield on wheat modern commercial cultivars.
A previous study by [33] reported lower productivity of bread wheat Sicilian landraces when compared to modern commercial varieties. In the present study, the grain yields of modern durum wheat varieties were slightly above the average among the examined genotypes; in spite of that, several landraces achieved higher grain yield. These landraces were characterized by higher than average net photosynthesis rate (Margherito, Castiglione Glabro, Bidi) and therefore higher productivity per unit of leaf area, or higher than average iWUE (Margherito, Russello Ibleo, Bidi), which allows higher productivity per unit of water transpired.
Considering the landraces and the modern commercial varieties in both rainfed and irrigated conditions, grain yield was highly correlated with stomatal conductance and transpiration rate and non-significantly correlated with iWUE, suggesting that high yield is linked to crop water use rather than merely the efficiency of crop water use. The ability to thoroughly utilize soil water depends on the extension of the root system [37,38,39], which is particularly deep in landraces selected in semi-arid areas [7,8,9,10].
Leaf area index and leaf area duration are further responsible for biomass and grain yield in wheat [40,41]. Whether wheat landraces are able to develop and maintain a greater leaf area than modern commercial varieties in water-limiting conditions has yet to be assessed.
Soil water availability effect on grain yield is more pronounced during the second part of the trial, due to the lower rainfall during the vegetative phases. Among the high-yielding landraces, Russello Ibleo and Pierciasacchi were least affected by the rainfed condition with a 3.8% and 6.6% reduction, respectively, while Castiglione Glabro was the most affected by the rainfed condition during the second year, reaching a reduction of 35%.
The reduction in grain yield due to the limiting soil water availability was higher in modern varieties than the average of the examined genotypes.
Grain yield losses due to the effect of soil water availability were in line with the results reported by [6], who found losses of 8% when wheat was irrigated based on long-term precipitation, between 41% and 51%, or between 37% and 48% when wheat was affected by, respectively, pre-heading and post-heading water limitation compared to the high water input yield. The same study reported that landraces from Turkey, Iran, and Afghanistan, where the precipitation distribution is similar to that of the Mediterranean climate, had a lower yield loss compared to modern varieties under limiting soil water, although modern varieties achieved higher grain yield [6]. In the present study, the difference between dry and irrigated grain yields was low due to the high soil water availability until the beginning of the seed ripening stage, leading to an optimal seed set in both rainfed and irrigated conditions. As a consequence, the difference in grain yield was only attributable to differences in grain filling.
Some Sicilian landraces, namely Margherito, Castiglione Glabro, Bidi, and Russello Ibleo, showed better performances in terms of grain yield and physiological responses than the most suited modern commercial varieties for the local environmental conditions. The genetic base of these phenotypic traits should be better investigated in order to provide additional tools for the wheat breeding programs in water-limited Mediterranean regions.

5. Conclusions

Wheat landraces responded to the different levels of water availability in the soil, showing a 26.8% reduction in stomatal conductance in rainfed condition, as a consequence of the reduced water availability. The reduction in the stomatal conductance limited the transpiration by 11.5% and therefore the water consumption of the crop, but also led to a reduction in the photosynthetic rate by 18.1%. Among local wheat landraces, Margherito, Castiglione Glabro, Bidi, and Russello exhibit equivalent or higher flag leaf net photosynthesis rates and reduced transpiration levels, resulting in higher grain yields under both rainfed and irrigated conditions. This reaffirms their value as a genetic resource for wheat breeding programs in drought-vulnerable Mediterranean areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.C. and G.T.; methodology, S.A.C. and G.T.; software, S.A.C.; validation, S.L.C. and G.T.; formal analysis, S.A.C.; investigation, S.A.C., P.C., A.S. and U.A.; resources, S.L.C. and G.T.; data curation, S.A.C. and U.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.C.; writing—review and editing, S.A.C. and S.L.C.; visualization, S.A.C.; supervision, S.L.C. and G.T.; project administration, S.L.C.; funding acquisition, S.L.C. and G.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “FiSiPro” 2020–2023 16.1 project; grant number G66D20000200009, Italy.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Matteo Maugeri, Dario Maugeri, Alfio Leone, Luciano Guglielmino, and Santo Virgillito of the University of Catania for field trial set-up and maintenance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Sciacca, F.; Cambrea, M.; Licciardello, S.; Pesce, A.; Romano, E.; Spina, A.; Virzì, N.; Palumbo, M. Evolution of Durum Wheat from Sicilian Landraces to Improved Varieties. Options Méditerranéennes Ser. A 2014, 110, 139–145. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zencirci, N.; Baloch, F.S.; Habyarimana, E.; Chung, G. (Eds.) Wheat Landraces; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; ISBN 978-3-030-77387-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frankin, S.; Roychowdhury, R.; Nashef, K.; Abbo, S.; Bonfil, D.J.; Ben-David, R. In-Field Comparative Study of Landraces vs. Modern Wheat Genotypes under a Mediterranean Climate. Plants 2021, 10, 2612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lopes, M.S.; El-Basyoni, I.; Baenziger, P.S.; Singh, S.; Royo, C.; Ozbek, K.; Aktas, H.; Ozer, E.; Ozdemir, F.; Manickavelu, A.; et al. Exploiting Genetic Diversity from Landraces in Wheat Breeding for Adaptation to Climate Change. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3477–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amato, C.; Anastasi, U.; Blangiforti, S.; Giannone, V.; Guarnaccia, P.; Venora, G.; Caruso, P.; Spina, A. Caratteristiche Bioagronomiche e Qualitative Di Popolazioni Locali Siciliane Di Frumento Duro. In Proceedings of the Atti dell’11° Convegno Aistec: I Cereali per un Sistema Agroalimentare di Qualità, Rome, Italy, 22–24 November 2017; pp. 68–72. [Google Scholar]
  6. Eser, C.; Soylu, S.; Ozkan, H. Drought Responses of Traditional and Modern Wheats in Different Phenological Stages. Field Crops Res. 2024, 305, 109201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakhforoosh, A.; Nagel, K.A.; Fiorani, F.; Bodner, G. Deep Soil Exploration vs. Topsoil Exploitation: Distinctive Rooting Strategies between Wheat Landraces and Wild Relatives. Plant Soil. 2021, 459, 397–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bektas, H.; Hohn, C.E.; Waines, J.G. Root and Shoot Traits of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Landraces and Cultivars. Euphytica 2016, 212, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Moragues, M.; del Moral, L.F.G.; Moralejo, M.; Royo, C. Yield Formation Strategies of Durum Wheat Landraces with Distinct Pattern of Dispersal within the Mediterranean Basin: II. Biomass Production and Allocation. Field Crops Res. 2006, 95, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Waines, J.G.; Ehdaie, B. Domestication and Crop Physiology: Roots of Green-Revolution Wheat. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 991–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Labianca, M. Towards the New Common Agricultural Policy for Biodiversity: Custodian Farmers for Sustainable Agricultural Practices in the Apulia Region (South of Italy). Belg. Rev. Belg. Géographie 2022, 4, 57113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lodhi, S.S.; Maryam, S.; Rafique, K.; Shafique, A.; Yousaf, Z.A.; Talha, A.M.; Gul, A.; Amir, R. Chapter 21—Overview of the Prospective Strategies for Conservation of Genomic Diversity in Wheat Landraces. In Climate Change and Food Security with Emphasis on Wheat; Ozturk, M., Gul, A., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 293–309. ISBN 978-0-12-819527-7. [Google Scholar]
  13. Newton, A.C.; Akar, T.; Baresel, J.P.; Bebeli, P.J.; Bettencourt, E.; Bladenopoulos, K.V.; Czembor, J.H.; Fasoula, D.A.; Katsiotis, A.; Koutis, K.; et al. Cereal Landraces for Sustainable Agriculture. In Sustainable Agriculture; Lichtfouse, E., Hamelin, M., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Eds.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 2, pp. 147–186. ISBN 978-94-007-0393-3. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gallo, G.; Bianco, M.L.; Bognanni, R.; Saimbene, G.; Orlando, A.; Grillo, O.; Saccone, R.; Venora, G. Durum Wheat Bread: Old Sicilian Varieties and Improved Ones. Nong Ye Ke Xue Yu Ji Shu 2010, 4, 10. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dinelli, G.; Carretero, A.S.; Di Silvestro, R.; Marotti, I.; Fu, S.; Benedettelli, S.; Ghiselli, L.; Gutiérrez, A.F. Determination of Phenolic Compounds in Modern and Old Varieties of Durum Wheat Using Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 7229–7240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Blum, A. Improving Wheat Grain Filling under Stress by Stem Reserve Mobilisation. Euphytica 1998, 100, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gaju, O.; DeSilva, J.; Carvalho, P.; Hawkesford, M.J.; Griffiths, S.; Greenland, A.; Foulkes, M.J. Leaf Photosynthesis and Associations with Grain Yield, Biomass and Nitrogen-Use Efficiency in Landraces, Synthetic-Derived Lines and Cultivars in Wheat. Field Crops Res. 2016, 193, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jiang, G.M.; Sun, J.Z.; Liu, H.Q.; Qu, C.M.; Wang, K.J.; Guo, R.J.; Bai, K.Z.; Gao, L.M.; Kuang, T.Y. Changes in the Rate of Photosynthesis Accompanying the Yield Increase in Wheat Cultivars Released in the Past 50 Years. J. Plant Res. 2003, 116, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zheng, T.C.; Zhang, X.K.; Yin, G.H.; Wang, L.N.; Han, Y.L.; Chen, L.; Huang, F.; Tang, J.W.; Xia, X.C.; He, Z.H. Genetic Gains in Grain Yield, Net Photosynthesis and Stomatal Conductance Achieved in Henan Province of China between 1981 and 2008. Field Crops Res. 2011, 122, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Richards, R.A. Selectable Traits to Increase Crop Photosynthesis and Yield of Grain Crops. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Calderini, D.F.; Dreccer, M.F.; Slafer, G.A. Genetic Improvement in Wheat Yield and Associated Traits. A Re-Examination of Previous Results and the Latest Trends. Plant Breed. 1995, 114, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Shao, M.; Zhang, J. The Relations of Stomatal Conductance, Water Consumption, Growth Rate to Leaf Water Potential during Soil Drying and Rewatering Cycle of Wheat (Triticum aestivum). Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 2002, 43, 187–192. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tfwala, C.M.; Mengistu, A.G.; Ukoh Haka, I.B.; van Rensburg, L.D.; Du Preez, C.C. Seasonal Variations of Transpiration Efficiency Coefficient of Irrigated Wheat. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Christy, B.; Tausz-Posch, S.; Tausz, M.; Richards, R.; Rebetzke, G.; Condon, A.; McLean, T.; Fitzgerald, G.; Bourgault, M.; O’Leary, G. Benefits of Increasing Transpiration Efficiency in Wheat under Elevated CO2 for Rainfed Regions. Glob. Change Biol. 2018, 24, 1965–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qiao, Y.; Li, D.; Qiao, W.; Li, Y.; Yang, H.; Liu, W.; Liu, M.; Zhang, X.; Dong, B. Development and Application of a Relative Soil Water Content—Transpiration Efficiency Curve for Screening High Water Use Efficiency Wheat Cultivars. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 967210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, Q.; Gao, Y.; Hamani, A.K.M.; Fu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, X. Effects of Warming and Drought Stress on the Coupling of Photosynthesis and Transpiration in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Spina, A.; Guarnaccia, P.; Canale, M.; Sanfilippo, R.; Bizzini, M.; Blangiforti, S.; Zingale, S.; Lo Piero, A.R.; Allegra, M.; Sicilia, A.; et al. Sicilian Rivet Wheat Landraces: Grain Characteristics and Technological Quality of Flour and Bread. Plants 2023, 12, 2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Broccanello, C.; Bellin, D.; DalCorso, G.; Furini, A.; Taranto, F. Genetic Approaches to Exploit Landraces for Improvement of Triticum Turgidum Ssp. Durum in the Age of Climate Change. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lotti, G.; Galoppini, C. Guida alle Analisi Chimico-Agrarie; Edizioni Agricole: Bologna, Italy, 1967; ISBN 88-206-0805-7. [Google Scholar]
  30. Helrich, K. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists International; AOAC: Rockville, MD, USA, 1990; ISBN 0-935584-42-0. [Google Scholar]
  31. Fiore, M.C.; Mercati, F.; Spina, A.; Blangiforti, S.; Venora, G.; Dell’Acqua, M.; Lupini, A.; Preiti, G.; Monti, M.; Pè, M.E. High-Throughput Genotype, Morphology, and Quality Traits Evaluation for the Assessment of Genetic Diversity of Wheat Landraces from Sicily. Plants 2019, 8, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Spina, A.; Guarnaccia, P.; Blangiforti, S.; Venora, G.; Caruso, P.; Anastasi, U. Bioagronomic And Qualitative Characteristics of Sicilian Bread Wheat Landraces. In Proceedings of the XLVII Conference of Italian Society for Agronomy, Marsala, Italy, 12–14 September 2018; p. 208. [Google Scholar]
  33. Cosentino, S.L.; Sanzone, E.; Testa, G.; Patanè, C.; Anastasi, U.; Scordia, D. Does Post-Anthesis Heat Stress Affect Plant Phenology, Physiology, Grain Yield and Protein Content of Durum Wheat in a Semi-Arid Mediterranean Environment? J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2019, 205, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scavo, A.; Restuccia, A.; Bannò, M.; Mauromicale, G. Differentiated Weed-Suppressive Ability of Modern and Old Durum Wheat Cultivars after Long-Term Cultivation under Semi-Arid Climate. Plants 2022, 11, 3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Allen, R.G.; Pereira, L.S.; Raes, D.; Smith, M. Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements; FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1998; Volume 300, p. D05109. [Google Scholar]
  36. R Core Team, R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021; Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 16 April 2024).
  37. Palta, J.; Watt, M. Chapter 13—Vigorous Crop Root Systems: Form and Function for Improving the Capture of Water and Nutrients. In Crop Physiology; Sadras, V., Calderini, D., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 309–325. ISBN 978-0-12-374431-9. [Google Scholar]
  38. Seidel, S.J.; Gaiser, T.; Srivastava, A.K.; Leitner, D.; Schmittmann, O.; Athmann, M.; Kautz, T.; Guigue, J.; Ewert, F.; Schnepf, A. Simulating Root Growth as a Function of Soil Strength and Yield With a Field-Scale Crop Model Coupled With a 3D Architectural Root Model. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 865188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Djaman, K.; O’Neill, M.; Owen, C.; Smeal, D.; West, M.; Begay, D.; Allen, S.; Koudahe, K.; Irmak, S.; Lombard, K. Long-Term Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Seasonal Irrigation Amount, Evapotranspiration, Yield, and Water Productivity under Semiarid Climate. Agronomy 2018, 8, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, Z.; Guo, J.; Xiang, Y.; Lu, X.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Cheng, M.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; An, J.; et al. Estimation of Leaf Area Index and Above-Ground Biomass of Winter Wheat Based on Optimal Spectral Index. Agronomy 2022, 12, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Senapati, N.; Semenov, M.A. Assessing Yield Gap in High Productive Countries by Designing Wheat Ideotypes. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Meteorological variables (Tmax = month average of daily maximum temperature, Tavg = month average of daily mean temperature, Tmin = month average of daily minimum temperature, ET0 = month sum of daily reference evapotranspiration, Precipitation = monthly precipitation) from October 2019 to July 2021 at the experimental site (Catania, 37°24′ N., 15°03′ E., 10 m a.s.l.).
Figure 1. Meteorological variables (Tmax = month average of daily maximum temperature, Tavg = month average of daily mean temperature, Tmin = month average of daily minimum temperature, ET0 = month sum of daily reference evapotranspiration, Precipitation = monthly precipitation) from October 2019 to July 2021 at the experimental site (Catania, 37°24′ N., 15°03′ E., 10 m a.s.l.).
Agronomy 14 01038 g001
Figure 2. Grain yield (Mg ha−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average grain yield for each genotype. Grain yield LSD = 0.770 Mg ha−1. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Figure 2. Grain yield (Mg ha−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average grain yield for each genotype. Grain yield LSD = 0.770 Mg ha−1. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Agronomy 14 01038 g002
Figure 3. Stomatal conductance (gs, mol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Figure 3. Stomatal conductance (gs, mol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”), and one modern commercial variety of soft wheat (“Bologna”). The red lines represent the average value for each genotype. Letters indicate significant differences between genotype means using Fisher’s LSD post hoc test.
Agronomy 14 01038 g003
Figure 7. Variation of grain yield (Mg ha−1) in relation to the net assimilation rate (A, µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), and two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”). The dashed red line represents the linear regression. The continuous black lines represent the mean values for grain yield and net assimilation rate.
Figure 7. Variation of grain yield (Mg ha−1) in relation to the net assimilation rate (A, µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 and 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for twelve ancient Sicilian populations of durum wheat (“Bidì”, “Castiglione Glabro”, “Giustalisa”, “Margherito”, “Perciasacchi”, “Realforte”, “Ruscia”, “Russello”, “Russello Ibleo”, “Timilia”, “Tripolino”, “Urria”), one ancient Sicilian population of bread wheat (“Maiorca”), one old variety of durum wheat (“Senatore Cappelli”), and two modern commercial varieties of durum wheat (“Mongibello” and “Core”). The dashed red line represents the linear regression. The continuous black lines represent the mean values for grain yield and net assimilation rate.
Agronomy 14 01038 g007
Figure 8. Pearson correlation matrix of the measured variables (grain yield, A = net assimilation rate, IWUE = instant water use efficiency, gs = stomatal conductance, E = transpiration rate).
Figure 8. Pearson correlation matrix of the measured variables (grain yield, A = net assimilation rate, IWUE = instant water use efficiency, gs = stomatal conductance, E = transpiration rate).
Agronomy 14 01038 g008
Figure 9. Stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 9. Stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g009
Figure 10. Stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 10. Stomatal conductance (mol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g010
Figure 11. Net assimilation rate (µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 11. Net assimilation rate (µmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g011
Figure 12. Net assimilation rate (µmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 12. Net assimilation rate (µmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g012
Figure 13. Transpiration rate (mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes. The red lines represent the average value for each genotype.
Figure 13. Transpiration rate (mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes. The red lines represent the average value for each genotype.
Agronomy 14 01038 g013
Figure 14. Transpiration rate (mmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes. The red lines represent the average value for each genotype.
Figure 14. Transpiration rate (mmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes. The red lines represent the average value for each genotype.
Agronomy 14 01038 g014
Figure 15. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 15. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol mmol m−2 s−1) during 2020 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g015
Figure 16. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol mmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Figure 16. Instantaneous water use efficiency (µmol mmol m−2 s−1) during 2021 cropping seasons under two irrigation levels (rainfed and irrigated) for 17 wheat genotypes.
Agronomy 14 01038 g016
Table 1. Soil characteristics of the field site in the top layer (0–50 cm).
Table 1. Soil characteristics of the field site in the top layer (0–50 cm).
Soil CharacteristicsUnitValueMethod
Sand%49.3Gattorta [29]
Loam%22.4Gattorta [29]
Clay%28.3Gattorta [29]
pH 8.6In water solution
Total calcareous%15.2Gas-volumetric [30]
Organic matter%1.4Walkley and Black [30]
Total N1Kjeldahl [30]
P2O5 availabilityppm5Ferrari [30]
K2O availabilityppm245Dirks and Scheffer [30]
Bulk densityg cm−31.1
Field capacity at −0.03 MPa%27
Wilting point at −1.5 MPa%11
Table 2. Four-way ANOVA for main effects (Genotype, Irrigation, DAS = days after sowing, Year) and interaction (Genotype × Irrigation, Genotype × DAS, Irrigation × DAS, Genotype × Irrigation × DAS) on net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE). Three-way ANOVA for main effects (Genotype, Irrigation, Year) and interaction (Genotype × Irrigation) on grain yield. The p-value is reported. Irrigation and genotypes are the between-factor effects.
Table 2. Four-way ANOVA for main effects (Genotype, Irrigation, DAS = days after sowing, Year) and interaction (Genotype × Irrigation, Genotype × DAS, Irrigation × DAS, Genotype × Irrigation × DAS) on net photosynthesis rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (gs), instantaneous water use efficiency (IWUE). Three-way ANOVA for main effects (Genotype, Irrigation, Year) and interaction (Genotype × Irrigation) on grain yield. The p-value is reported. Irrigation and genotypes are the between-factor effects.
Surce of VariationAEgsiWUEGrain Yield
Genotype2.39 × 10−133.77 × 10−83.59 × 10−121.53 × 10−65.46× 10−12
Irrigation<10−153.68 × 10−15<10−152.52 × 10−63.13 × 10−4
DAS<10−15<10−15<10−15<10−15-
Year<10−15<10−15<10−153.59 × 10−5<10−15
Genotype × Irrigation0.290.480.130.520.99
Genotype × DAS8.99 × 10−124.83 × 10−75.72 × 10−127.45 × 10−5-
Irrigation × DAS0.621.27 × 10−60.590.29-
Genotype × Irrigation × DAS0.670.017660.120.30-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Corinzia, S.A.; Caruso, P.; Scandurra, A.; Anastasi, U.; Cosentino, S.L.; Testa, G. Yield Response and Leaf Gas Exchange of Sicilian Wheat Landraces. Agronomy 2024, 14, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051038

AMA Style

Corinzia SA, Caruso P, Scandurra A, Anastasi U, Cosentino SL, Testa G. Yield Response and Leaf Gas Exchange of Sicilian Wheat Landraces. Agronomy. 2024; 14(5):1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Corinzia, Sebastiano Andrea, Paolo Caruso, Alessio Scandurra, Umberto Anastasi, Salvatore Luciano Cosentino, and Giorgio Testa. 2024. "Yield Response and Leaf Gas Exchange of Sicilian Wheat Landraces" Agronomy 14, no. 5: 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14051038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop