Next Article in Journal
Financial Loss Assessment for Weather-Induced Railway Accidents Based on a Deep Learning Technique Using Weather Indicators
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Operator and Patient Doses after Irradiation with Handheld X-ray Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

AI in Experiments: Present Status and Future Prospects

by
Antonio Pagliaro
1,2,3,* and
Pierluca Sangiorgi
1
1
INAF IASF Palermo, Via Ugo La Malfa 153, 90146 Palermo, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Sezione di Catania, Via Santa Sofia 64, 95123 Catania, Italy
3
ICSC—Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in HPC, Big Data e Quantum Computing, 40121 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(18), 10415; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810415
Submission received: 8 September 2023 / Accepted: 14 September 2023 / Published: 18 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue AI Horizons: Present Status and Visions for the Next Era)
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become deeply intertwined with scientific inquiry and experimentation. This Special Issue, “AI in Experiments: Present Status and Future Prospects”, provides a timely snapshot of AI’s evolving role across diverse experimental domains.
The symbiotic relationship between AI and experiments is reshaping scientific workflows. From physics to biology and materials science, machine learning and statistical models have woven themselves into every facet of research—from hypothesis generation to experimental design, data analysis, and communication of results. Techniques like deep neural networks, reinforcement learning, and generative models are augmenting human capabilities and redefining the boundaries of achievable science.
The integration of AI into experiments has an interesting timeline, beginning in the 1990s, when machine learning methods like neural networks were first applied to analyze physics detector data. In the 2000s, breakthroughs in statistical learning approaches ushered in wider adoption across scientific fields. The 2010s saw rapid advances in deep learning fuel the proliferation of AI techniques. And in the past few years, generative models have opened new frontiers in simulation and data augmentation. As computing power continues to grow exponentially, the future promises more creative and accelerated scientific practices driven by AI.
In physics, AI has emerged as an invaluable tool for analyzing the multi-dimensional data from detectors and telescopes searching for rare events like cosmic rays, photons from distant pulsars, or elusive dark matter. Machine learning models help distinguish signals from overwhelming background noise in these experiments. In particular, dimensionality reduction techniques like principal component analysis and deep neural networks enhance the discrimination power of direct cosmic ray detection [1,2,3].
Fundamental physics experiments also rely on AI to discern anomalous particle signatures from collider data and pick out gravitational wave signals buried in detector noise. Unsupervised neural networks are gaining traction in both fields by learning from raw data in a self-directed manner without the need for training labels [4,5,6].
In gamma-ray astronomy, with the advent of sparsely distributed arrays of Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes, exemplified by the INAF ASTRI (Astrophysics with Italian Replicating Technology Mirrors) Mini-Array [7,8], AI promises to boost the sensitivity. Sophisticated image processing and classification algorithms help reduce interference from cosmic rays and enhance gamma-ray signals. This entails harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI) through advanced image and pattern recognition techniques. The strategic application of AI promises substantial advancements in gamma-ray astronomy, leading to improved instrument sensitivities and further insight into the mysteries of the universe [9,10].
Shifting our attention to the domain of satellite instruments, present AI research embarks on an innovative journey into the realm of cloud masking for satellite images. Departing from conventional techniques used in atmospheric monitoring from space, it explores groundbreaking algorithms designed for binary cloud masking in satellite imagery. These innovations hold the potential to revolutionize not only weather prediction, climate modeling, and environmental monitoring but also the precision calibration of instruments dedicated to measuring cosmic rays, as exemplified by the JEM-EUSO project [11].
Across experiments, AI has become indispensable for tasks like experimental design, real-time monitoring, simulation, and data analysis. AI-based simulations allow rapid, economical modeling of complex phenomena. Generative models transform noisy, low-resolution data into realistic, high-fidelity outputs. For example, in the ARGO-YBJ cosmic ray experiment, a multiscale AI method was used to help discriminate gamma ray signals from hadronic background events [12,13].
Recent advances demonstrate machine learning’s potential to accelerate and augment biomedical experiment analysis in diverse ways. In the realm of histopathology image analysis, innovative techniques can embed images into interpretable representation spaces that cluster similar samples and aid disease diagnosis [14]. Graph neural networks offer a promising new approach for modeling relationships between tissue regions in pathological images. By constructing graphs from histology images, the global structure is maintained to identify relevant patterns across the entire sample [15].
In genetic analysis, deep learning has emerged as a powerful new paradigm for DNA sequence classification, demonstrating advantages over traditional machine learning approaches. Working on tasks like metagenomic classification and chromatin state prediction shows deep network architectures that operate directly on raw DNA and can learn tailored sequence representations [16].
For text analysis, deep neural networks like DeepEva [17] enable automated assessment of complexity in sentences. By processing linguistic annotations, these models learn to classify based on textual features that correlate with readability. Such systems demonstrate superior performance over classical machine learning approaches for binary text classification.
While still evolving, these advances indicate machine learning’s immense potential to catalyze discovery and augmentation across biomedical experiments. AI-driven techniques show promise to uncover novel insights from rich sources like images, genetic sequences, and text. With careful integration of human domain expertise, state-of-the-art deep learning could accelerate investigations and provide transparency to build trust. The future is bright for augmented biomedical experimentation powered by artificial intelligence.
However, it is important to acknowledge AI’s limitations in scientific reasoning and model building. While machines can search huge datasets for patterns, they struggle to construct abstract explanatory models like humans. Alternative approaches to purely statistical machine learning, including model-based and hybrid AI, may help overcome these constraints [18].
As AI becomes further enmeshed with science, ethical challenges around data privacy, algorithmic transparency, and appropriate use of AI must be addressed. Multidisciplinary teams of scientists, ethicists, and policymakers will be key to charting a responsible path forward [19].
Looking ahead, AI-powered human augmentation and robotics will likely play an increasingly prominent role in reshaping the landscape of scientific experimentation. Exoskeletons and prosthetics infused with AI could enhance researchers’ physical capabilities and stamina for conducting lengthy experiments. AI-driven robotic assistants may work alongside scientists to efficiently carry out routine experimental tasks. Additionally, AI-powered microrobots could enable experiments at nanoscales that are far too tiny for direct human manipulation.
As we peer into the future, the prospects for AI in experiments are tantalizing. The ongoing research and development in AI-driven experiments promise to redefine the way we conduct scientific investigations. Machine learning, deep learning, and advanced AI techniques are poised to revolutionize data interpretation, enabling us to unearth hidden patterns, discover new phenomena, and explore the uncharted realms of the universe.
While still an emerging technology, AI is undoubtedly disrupting and enhancing scientific workflows. As scientists increasingly collaborate with AI experts, we can look forward to a future that is driven by augmented intelligence and expand the horizons of discovery.
However, it is imperative to acknowledge the challenges that lie ahead. Ensuring the ethical use of AI in experiments, addressing data privacy concerns, and bridging the gap between traditional scientific methodologies and AI-driven approaches are pivotal steps on this journey. Collaboration between scientists, AI experts, and policymakers will be instrumental in charting a responsible and innovative path forward. The future of experiments is intertwined with the future of AI, and together, they hold the promise of unlocking the mysteries of the universe and reshaping the way we perceive and interact with the world around us.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. The Pierre Auger Collab. The Pierre Auger Cosmic Ray Observatory. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2015, 798, 172. [Google Scholar]
  2. The Pierre Auger Collab. Searches for Ultra-High-Energy Photons at the Pierre Auger Observatory. Universe 2022, 8, 579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. The Pierre Auger Collab. Limits to Gauge Coupling in the Dark Sector Set by the Nonobservation of Instanton-Induced Decay of Super-Heavy Dark Matter in the Pierre Auger Observatory Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023, 130, 061001, Erratum in Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 042002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cheng, T.; Arguin, J.F.; Leissner-Martin, J.; Pilette, J.; Golling, T. Variational Autoencoders for Anomalous Jet Tagging. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 107, 016002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bini, S.; Vedovato, G.; Drago, M.; Salemi, F.; Prodi, G.A. An autoencoder neural network integrated into gravitational-wave burst searches to improve the rejection of noise transients. Class. Quantum Grav. 2023, 40, 135008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aalseth, C.E.; Acerbi, F.; Agnes, P.; Albuquerque, I.F.; Alexander, T.; Alici, A.; Alton, A.K.; Antonioli, P.; Arcelli, S.; Ardito, R.; et al. DarkSide-20k: A 20 tonne two-phase LAr TPC for direct dark matter detection at LNGS. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 2018, 133, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Scuderi, S.; Giuliani, A.; Pareschi, G.; Tosti, G.; Catalano, O.; Amato, E.; Antonelli, L.A.; Gonzàles, J.B.; Bellassai, G.; Bigongiari, C.; et al. The ASTRI Mini-Array of Cherenkov telescopes at the Observatorio del Teide. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2022, 35, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vercellone, S.; Bigongiari, C.; Burtovoi, A.; Cardillo, M.; Catalano, O.; Franceschini, A.; Lombardi, S.; Nava, L.; Pintore, F.; Stamerra, A.; et al. ASTRI Mini-Array core science at the Observatorio del Teide. J. High Energy Astrophys. 2022, 35, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pagliaro, A.; Cusumano, G.; La Barbera, A.; La Parola, V.; Lombardi, S. Application of Machine Learning Ensemble Methods to ASTRI Mini-Array Cherenkov Event Reconstruction. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 8172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bruno, A.; Pagliaro, A.; La Parola, V. Application of Machine and Deep Learning Methods to the Analysis of IACTs Data. In Intelligent Astrophysics. Emergence, Complexity and Computation; Zelinka, I., Brescia, M., Baron, D., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdellaoui, G.; Abe, S.; Adams, J.H., Jr.; Ahriche, A.; Allard, D.; Allen, L.; Alonso, G.; Anchordoqui, L.; Anzalone, A.N.; Arai, Y.; et al. First observations of speed of light tracks by a fluorescence detector looking down on the atmosphere. J. Instrum. 2018, 13, P05023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aielli, G.; Bacci, C.; Bartoli, B.; Bernardini, P.; Bi, X.J.; Bleve, C.; Branchini, P.; Budano, A.; Bussino, S.; Melcarne, A.C.; et al. Highlights from the ARGO-YBJ experiment. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2012, 661 (Suppl. S1), S50–S55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pagliaro, A.; D’Alí Staiti, G.; D’Anna, F. A multiscale method for gamma/h discrimination in extensive air showers. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2011, Beijing, China, 11–18 August 2011; Volume 1, pp. 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  14. Amato, D.; Calderaro, S.; Lo Bosco, G.; Rizzo, R.; Vella, F. Metric Learning in Histopathological Image Classification: Opening the Black Box. Sensors 2023, 23, 6003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Calderaro, S.; Lo Bosco, G.; Vella, F.; Rizzo, R. Breast Cancer Histologic Grade Identification by Graph Neural Network Embeddings. In Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Proceedings of the 10th International Work-Conference, IWBBIO 2023, Meloneras, Gran Canaria, Spain, 12–14 July 2023; Rojas, I., Valenzuela, O., Ruiz, F.R., Herrera, L.J., Ortuño, F., Eds.; Proceedings, Part II 2023; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Amato, D.; Gangi, M.A.; Fiannaca, A.; Paglia, L.L.; Rosa, M.L.; Bosco, G.L.; Rizzo, R.; Urso, A. Classification of Sequences with Deep Artificial Neural Networks: Representation and Architectural Issues. In Deep Learning for Biomedical Data Analysis; Elloumi, M., Ed.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 27–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lo Bosco, G.; Pilato, G.; Schicchi, D. DeepEva: A deep neural network architecture for assessing sentence complexity in Italian and English languages. Array 2021, 12, 100097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Iten, R.; Metger, T.; Wilming, H.; del Rio, L.; Renner, R. Discovering physical concepts with neural networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020, 124, 010508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mittelstadt, B. Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019, 1, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pagliaro, A.; Sangiorgi, P. AI in Experiments: Present Status and Future Prospects. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810415

AMA Style

Pagliaro A, Sangiorgi P. AI in Experiments: Present Status and Future Prospects. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(18):10415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810415

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pagliaro, Antonio, and Pierluca Sangiorgi. 2023. "AI in Experiments: Present Status and Future Prospects" Applied Sciences 13, no. 18: 10415. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131810415

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop