Next Article in Journal
Effect of Heat Treatment on Yellow Field Pea (Pisum sativum) Protein Concentrate Coupled with Membrane Ultrafiltration on Emulsification Properties of the Isolated >50 kDa Proteins
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial for the Special Issue “Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes”
Previous Article in Journal
Fabrication and Characterization of Cu2+-Driven PTFE-Reinforced Artificial Muscle Polymer Membrane for Water Purification and Energy Harvesting Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pathway for Water Transport through Breathable Nanocomposite Membranes of PEBAX with Ionic Liquid [C12C1im]Cl
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining

by
Geani Teodor Man
1,2,
Paul Constantin Albu
3,
Aurelia Cristina Nechifor
1,
Alexandra Raluca Grosu
1,
Szidonia-Katalin Tanczos
4,
Vlad-Alexandru Grosu
5,*,
Mihail-Răzvan Ioan
3 and
Gheorghe Nechifor
1,*
1
Analytical Chemistry and Environmental Engineering Department, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 011061 Bucharest, Romania
2
National Research and Development Institute for Cryogenics and Isotopic Technologies—ICSI, 240050 Râmnicu Valcea, Romania
3
Radioisotopes and Radiation Metrology Department (DRMR), IFIN Horia Hulubei, 023465 Măgurele, Romania
4
Department of Bioengineering, University Sapientia of Miercurea-Ciuc, 500104 Miercurea Ciuc, Romania
5
Department of Electronic Technology and Reliability, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technology, University Politehnica of Bucharest, 061071 Bucharest, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2023, 13(9), 765; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090765
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Revised: 16 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 29 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Application of Advanced Functional Membranes)

Abstract

:
Although only a slightly radioactive element, thorium is considered extremely toxic because its various species, which reach the environment, can constitute an important problem for the health of the population. The present paper aims to expand the possibilities of using membrane processes in the removal, recovery and recycling of thorium from industrial residues reaching municipal waste-processing platforms. The paper includes a short introduction on the interest shown in this element, a weak radioactive metal, followed by highlighting some common (domestic) uses. In a distinct but concise section, the bio-medical impact of thorium is presented. The classic technologies for obtaining thorium are concentrated in a single schema, and the speciation of thorium is presented with an emphasis on the formation of hydroxo-complexes and complexes with common organic reagents. The determination of thorium is highlighted on the basis of its radioactivity, but especially through methods that call for extraction followed by an established electrochemical, spectral or chromatographic method. Membrane processes are presented based on the electrochemical potential difference, including barro-membrane processes, electrodialysis, liquid membranes and hybrid processes. A separate sub-chapter is devoted to proposals and recommendations for the use of membranes in order to achieve some progress in urban mining for the valorization of thorium.

1. Introduction

Thorium is a relatively exotic element, although it is known to have a significant natural abundance compared to lead [1]. With a component of the actinide series at position #90 and a weight of the gram atom equaling 232.03, it is unstable (radioactive) in all its isotopes except isotope 232Th [2]. The half-time of 232Th is so long that it is considered stable when joining uranium, which also occurs naturally [3]. The interest in thorium as a nuclear material should have resulted in an increased interest both on the part of researchers and on the part of energy producers [4]. However, the particularity of thorium is that it cannot sustain a chain reaction by itself, as is the case with uranium and plutonium [5], but fission can be produced under the influence of neutrons from an external source [6]. If the thorium atoms absorb a neutron, they turn into a heavier isotope, which then rapidly disintegrates into an isotope of the element protactinium and further into a fissioned uranium isotope under the incidence of bombardment with another neutron [7]. Because its disintegration line does not end with a material usable in the military industry, the interest in this nuclear fuel remains low [8].
Thus, the number of existing publications highlighted in Google Scholar [9] or SCOPUS [10], selected according to a specific algorithm [11] and using various keywords of scientific interest, is relatively moderate or even low (Table 1).
Recent publications are consistent and draw attention to the need to reconsider thorium as a nuclear material with a clear perspective [1,2,3,4,5] but also as an environmental polluter [6,7,8]. On the other hand, new materials usable in various analytical or technological separative techniques are also studied [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20].
However, after analyzing Table 1, many would be discouraged to start research on aspects of recovery, recycling, or removal of thorium from various sources, although its common applications have determined its presence in urban waste in surprisingly high concentrations.
This last observation led to the initiation of this paper, whose aim is to warn both researchers and environmental officers regarding the danger of the uncontrolled spread of thorium as well as propose simpler solutions for removal, recovery and recycling, based on processes very close to “urban mining”.
The specific objectives of this work are to emphasize the existence of thorium in various materials used over time for common applications, the toxicity and bio-medical implications of thorium, the established technologies for obtaining thorium, the speciation of thorium in aqueous solutions, and the determination of thorium membrane processes with integration perspectives in thorium recovery or removal technologies and proposals regarding this aspect.

2. Applications of Thorium

Thorium, and especially thorium dioxide, has found relatively numerous applications for a radioactive element, even if this radioactivity is weak [21,22,23]. As various and unexpected, with many having been abandoned, the applications of thorium are so common (Figure 1) that they have become dangerous [21], especially since after the use of various materials and under the conditions of inattention in recycling or selective collection, thorium ends up in the environment [22].
In addition to its surprising use in toothpaste, in the dating of hominids, as a contrast agent in certain radiological examinations or as a filament in incandescent light bulbs, lamps, lanterns, and thorium mantles [23], it is also used for technical applications in which it is practically irreplaceable: crucibles for high temperatures, welding electrodes and alloys (aluminum, magnesium, steel), lamps for special electronic equipment, mantles in the metallurgical industry, industrial catalysts (ammonia, sulfuric acid, cracking hydrocarbons), the manufacture of thorium-mixed oxide tablets and uranium, oxygen detectors, and lenses for various optical and opto-electronic devices (having excellent wavelength dispersion and high refractive index) [24,25].
We can conclude that thorium, although radioactive, can be found in the aerospace industry, automobile industry, chemical and metallurgical industry, electrotechnical industry, electronics industry, dentistry (cements for dentistry, optical and surgical instruments, manufacturing), and in art objects (alloys, jewelry, sculptures, statues) [26,27], which leads to thorium being an environmental pollutant [28,29,30].

3. Toxicity and Bio-Medical Implications

Thorium is included on the list of carcinogenic substances [31], even though it decomposes through alfa decay [32], and the emitted alfa radiation cannot penetrate human skin [33].
The dangers associated with its radioactivity, due to the use of thorium in various technologies that capitalize on the high melting of thorium dioxide, lead to the following [34,35,36,37,38]:
  • the amounts of thorium in the environment can be accidentally increased during processing;
  • humans absorb thorium through food or drinking water (in areas adjacent to mining operations);
  • the quantities in the air are very small (insignificant and generally neglected);
  • amounts are high near hazardous waste storage or processing sites;
  • amounts are high in industrial laboratories or mining laboratories that mill minerals containing thorium.
The medical effects, observed over time, of those who acquire thorium at work are as follows [39,40,41,42]:
  • greater chance of developing lung disease;
  • higher occurrence of lung and pancreatic cancer;
  • changes in genetic material;
  • higher instance of blood cancer;
  • greater chance of developing liver diseases (when injecting thorium for X-rays);
  • storage in bones (long-term exposure) can lead to the generation of bone cancer.
Being a heavy metal, the medical effects of thorium as well as the precautions for working with it must be considered [43,44].
At the same time, natural thorium is in secular equilibrium with its descendants, which makes it necessary to consider their radiotoxicity; for this reason, it is classified among the most dangerous radionuclides [45,46].

4. Classical Technology

Thorium is found in monazite (1 to 15%) in concentrations that allow it to be exploited on an industrial scale, through classical technologies [47]. At the same time, thorium appears in mining processes, especially those aimed at obtaining rare earths or uranium [48,49,50].
The schemes in Figure 2 show the main operations that lead to obtaining thorium from monazite through acid (Figure 2a) or the basic attack (Figure 2b) of impurities; however, in principle, any mineral is considered as a source of thorium, with the series of technological operations being the same [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58].
In practice, the mineral (source of thorium) is brought to a state of fine grinding in order to be attacked by sulfuric acid or a base (sodium hydroxide), so that the parts of the mineral not containing thorium pass into the solution, while others are removed by filtration. The filtrate containing thorium (colloidal) can be directly processed (when purification is not done in this technology) or precipitated, filtered and finally subjected to purification by extraction in an organic solvent (kerosene) and TBP as a complexant [59], or an organic solvent and an amine or a selective complexant and re-extraction [60].
If the source of thorium is a mineral containing rare earths or the residue obtained during the processing of various minerals in order to obtain rare earth elements (REEs), then the basic procedures used in the separation, concentration and purification of thorium are leaching [61,62,63], precipitation [64,65,66,67], solvent extraction [68,69] and ion exchange [70].
Obtaining thorium from pure compounds (halogens, halides) or alloys can be performed using physical (thermal) or chemical (reduction) processes [71,72].
For the current work, which involves obtaining thorium from industrial residues or by-products (waste), the diagrams in Figure 2 present, as narrow technological points, the filtration and extraction operations likely to be replaced to avoid environmental pollution [73,74].

5. Thorium Speciation

Thorium compounds are relatively few compared to other elements, even the less reactive ones [75,76]. Thus, thorium dioxide, halogens or a nitride are encountered, but the speciation of the thorium ion (Th4+) in aqueous solutions is of practical importance, as countless hydroxylated chemical species can be generated: [ThOH]3+, [Th(OH)2]2+, [Th(OH)3]+, [Th(OH)4], [Th(OH)2 (CO3)2]2−, [Th2(OH)2]6+ and [Th(H2O)9]4+ [77,78,79], hence the importance of the operational parameters (pH, ionic strength, temperature, contact ions in the aqueous solution [80,81,82,83]), which would be the object of the study of membrane processes.
When dissolving thorium nitrate (for example) in water, the mentioned hydroxyl species are formed, but also combinations that may include carbon dioxide (present in the environment). Considering the formation of only thorium hydroxides in aqueous solution, a series of chemical species are formed as a result of some equilibria with proton exchange, which is dependent on pH and is shown hypothetically in Figure 3. The degree of formation in solution of various chemical species can be determined exactly if the acidity constants of the chemical species and/or stability constants of the hydroxyl complexes are known [67].
The appearance of thorium dioxide is also related to the pH, ionic strength and temperature of the solution; however, as a solid phase, it depends essentially on the concentration of thorium obtained at a given moment in the phases of a technology, and more importantly, on the distribution of thorium in the environment [80,81,82,83].
At the same time, if we consider that thorium is obtained in the source solution as Th4+ ion, then a wide series of organic complexants (Figure 4) can contribute to the formation of some speciations involved in the concentration and recovery, especially through extraction, of thorium [84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102].
The speciation of thorium in aqueous solution is important because the various hydroxo-hydroxyl species have different sizes, so membrane processes based on size separation can be chosen accordingly, moving from reverse osmosis to nanofiltration or even to ultrafiltration or colloidal filtration. Certainly, the aspects of chemical speciation of thorium in the presence of some inorganic complexants, but especially organic ones, are much more difficult to exploit, because the new chemical species have various hydrophobic-hydrophilic shells, depending on the considered ligand. These chemical species can be considered for separations with liquid or composite membranes that exhibit selective or even specific interactions with the ligands that incorporate the thorium ion.

6. Thorium Determination

Although a radioactive element, physical–chemical analysis based on specific reactions finds permanent use in various applications [86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99]. The main reagent, studied exhaustively and used with excellent results in various working conditions, is Thorin, 1-(2-Arsonophenylazo)-2-hydroxy-3,6-naphthalene-disulfonic acid sodium salt, 2-(2-Hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-1-naphthylazo)-benzene-arsenic acid sodium salt; Empirical Formula (Hill Notation): C16H11AsN2Na2O10S2 [87,88].
Otherwise, the radiation analyses for thorium are few, although they refer to the entire radiation register (α, β or γ) [103,104,105,106,107,108,109] (Table 2).
That is why, alongside the highly developed spectrophotometric methods [95], the studied reagents are today widely used for preconcentration [96], with a view to the permanent development of new methods, including electrochemical, optode, electrochemical sensor and coupled spectral methods [110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134].
Table 2. Analysis methods for thorium: characteristics and applications.
Table 2. Analysis methods for thorium: characteristics and applications.
Analytical MethodsSamples and/or ApplicationsCharacteristics Refs.
Radiometric analysis (α, β or γ)Determination of uranium, thorium, plutonium, americium and curium ultra-tracesPhoton–electron rejecting α liquid scintillation[103]
Determination for levels of uranium and thorium in water along Oum Er-Rabia RiverAlpha track detectors[104]
Thorium determination in intercomparison samples and in some Romanian building materialsGamma ray spectrometry[105]
Thorium determinationMiscellaneous techniques[106,107]
X-ray fluorescence spectrometryDetermination of thorium in natural waterCoupled with preconcentration method[108]
Trace element determination in thorium oxideTotal reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry[109]
Inductively Coupled Plasma- (ICP-)Analysis of rare earth elements, thorium and uranium in geochemical certified reference materials and soilsMass spectrometry (ICP-MS)[110]
Determination of trace element concentrations and stable lead, uranium and thorium isotope ratios in in NORM and NORM-polluted sample leachatesQuadrupole-ICP-MS[111]
Chemical separation and determination of seventeen trace metals in thorium oxide matrix using a novel extractant—Cyanex-923Atomic Emission Spectrometry (AES)[112]
Determination of Th and UAES with MSF[113]
Determination of trace thorium in uranium dioxideAES[114]
Determination of REE, U, Th, Ba and Zr in simulated hydrogeological leachatesAES after matrix solvent extraction[115]
Determination of thorium and light rare-earth elements in soil water and its high molecular mass organic fractionsMS and on-line-coupled size-exclusion chromatography[116]
Determination of trace thorium and uranium impurities in scandium with high matrixOptical Emission Spectrometry (OES)[117]
Determination of thorium(IV), titanium(IV), iron(III), lead(II) and chromium(III) on 2-nitroso-1-naphthol-impregnated MCI GEL CHP20P resinPreconcentration and MS[118]
Trace metal determination in uranium and thorium compounds without prior matrix separationElectrothermal vaporization and AES[119]
Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (AAS)Thorium, zirconium and vanadium as chemical modifiers in the determination of arsenicElectrothermal atomization[120]
Cyclic Voltametric (CV)Application in some nuclear material characterizationsUranyl ion in sulfuric acid solutions[121]
Chemically Modified Electrode (CME)Determination of thorium by adsorptive typePoly-complex system[122]
Fluorogenic thorium sensorsBased on 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid-substituted tetraphenylethenesInduced emission characteristics[123]
Selective optodeDesign and evaluation of thorium (IV)Membrane was prepared by incorporating 4-(p-nitrophenyl azo)–pyrocatechol[124]
Micellar electrokinetic chromatographicOre and fish samplesAnalysis of Th, U, Cu, Ni, Co and FE[125]
Laser-induced breakdown spectrometryDetermination of trace constituents in thoriaDetermination of thorium or uranyl ions[126,127]
Electrochemical and spectro-electrochemicalStudies of bis(diketonate) thorium(IV) and uranium(IV) porphyrinsComplexes were synthesized using a hexa-aza porphyrin[128]
Electrochemically modified detector Elemental analysis of actinidesGraphite electrode with phthalocyanine [129]
Selective extraction and trace determination of thoriumSynthesis of its application in water samples by spectrophotometryUiO-66-OH zirconium MOF[130]
Anodic polarization of thoriumStudy of tungsten, cadmium and thorium electrodesElectrochemical impedance spectroscopy[131]
High-performance liquid chromatographyStudies on lanthanides, uranium and thoriumAmide-modified reversed phase supports[132]
Ion exchangeExtraction of thorium on resinAvailable extraction chromatographic resin[133]
Separation of actinium from proton-irradiated thorium metalExtraction chromatography[134]
The presented analytical methods offer, in addition to the information needed for the specific determinations of thorium in various matrices, possible ways of approaching separation through membrane techniques alternative to extraction, ion exchange, adsorption or chromatography.

7. Thorium Separation and/or Pre-Concentration

In analytical or technological research, the concentration of thorium has constituted a special problem, as it accompanies the rare earth elements (REEs), especially uranium [135,136].
The concentration process that is often followed and technologically supported is the pre-concentration of thorium [137,138,139].
Table 3 presents results that can form the basis of the development of urban thorium mining and that are focused on the concentration, pre-concentration, separation, extraction, ion exchange, sorption and bio-sorption of thorium or thorium–uranium from various samples and aqueous solutions [140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170].
The remarkable results in the development of organic ligands (Table 2), and especially of selective materials (Table 3), allow a confident approach to the recovery and recycling of thorium from electrical and electronic waste, but more generally (considering the slightly selective separation of waste) of residues that reach the integrated municipal storage and waste platforms (especially from construction).

8. Membrane and Membrane Processes

Membranes and membrane processes can be an attractive alternative for the separation of chemical species containing thorium from various sources, with reduced concentrations in this element. On the one hand, membranes can integrate into the classical technologies for obtaining thorium; on the other hand, the speculations that can be made between thorium and various complexants are compatible with membrane separations.
In order to highlight these aspects, this subchapter presents some characteristics of the main membrane processes.
Membranes and processes have evolved from laboratory-scale installations to industrial ones, having at the same time an increased economic and commercial importance [170]. Membrane processes have not only replaced some of the conventional separation processes but also have produced remarkable results in areas where conventional techniques are exhausted or very expensive [171]. Among the problems that have determined the exponential development of membrane processes are those of environmental protection, since technologies based on membranes and membrane separation techniques are recognized as ecological technologies [172].

8.1. Introduction to Membranes and Membrane Processes

If we focus on membrane processes, it can be stated that the membrane is a window of a multi-component system (Figure 5), with selective permeability for chemical species of the system [173]. This membrane allows the separation of the considered system, consisting of a continuous phase (solvent) in which ionic chemical species, molecules and macromolecules are dissolved. At the same time, molecular aggregates and dispersed particles can be separated into components by classical or membrane processes [174]. In order for the separation process to occur, the system must be subjected to an electrochemical potential difference or driving force (Δµ) [175].
The most important driving forces on membrane processes are as follows [176]:
  • P = transmembrane pressure difference;
  • Δc = concentration difference between the two compartments separated by a membrane;
  • ΔE = potential difference.
It should be emphasized that in the last decade membrane processes involving potential gradient, thermal, magnetic, and interfacial tension, and volatility have undergone significant development [177].
In this subchapter, we will briefly present the essential aspects of the processes involving pressure or concentration gradient (liquid membranes).

8.2. Barro Membrane Processes

In membrane processes, the pressure difference (Δp) constitutes a technically and economically accessible driving force, leading to many applications, including microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis (hyperfiltration) [178]. The first and most developed application was the obtaining of drinking water from sea water (Figure 6a), when it was found that, by applying a pressure higher than the osmotic pressure of sea water, most of the solvent passes (96–99%) through a semi-permeable membrane [179]. While these processes have applications on an industrial scale, their introduction in a certain technology presents a flow optimization problem (Figure 6b,c) [178,179,180], which depends on the load in the chemical species to be removed from the solvent that constitutes the feed [181]. There is the option of operating using dead-end filtration of a cross-flow filtration system [182]. The design of filtration devices may differ; chemical equipment manufacturers compete to create prototypes with increasingly high performance by improving the flow on the membrane (Figure 6d,e) [183,184]. In filtration processes, regardless of preventative efforts, the membrane becomes dirty or clogs, or concentration polarization (solute accumulation) occurs on the layer adjacent to the membrane; thus, process engineering is complemented by the introduction of ultrasonic cleaning devices into the technology, cavitation, magnetic stirring, or pulsatile flow vibrations [185].
However, in essence, the feeding can be done through large cylindrical, tubular, spiraled or capillary (hollow fiber) spaces, in which, along with the flow through and/or on the membrane and avoiding fouling (contamination, soiling), the aim is to increase the area of the contact surface of the membrane with the dispersed system of feeding (Figure 7) [186]. Of course, the operation can be done by introducing the feeding solution, as in Figure 7, but most often, with the feed solution being dirtier, it is inserted between tubes or fibers for a possible physical cleaning [187,188,189].
A homogenous system can be separated by aggregation (segregation), so that instead of a high-pressure process (Table 4), a lower-pressure one is used [186,187].
The first processes of this kind were promoted by Schamehorn, the ultrafiltration of micellar systems (MUF), which consisted of transforming a solution into an ultra-micro-dispersed system by adding suitable surfactants, followed by ultrafiltration [190,191,192].
The condition for using micellar ultrafiltration is that the micelles contain the organic compound, which means an impurity of the concentrate [193].
The variants of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration have undergone significant development due to nano-species and nanomaterials (nanoparticles, nanotubes, nanofibers, proteins, soluble polymers, polyelectrolytes, micelles and vesicles) also being used as carriers (Figure 8) in processes in liquid membranes [194].
The concentration polarization and the diffusion effects related to the sizes of solutes with low molecular masses can influence the working conditions of nano- and ultrafiltration, with the number of additives required being determined experimentally [195].

8.3. Electro-Membrane Processes

Electrodialysis is the most widespread separation process, carried out under an electric potential gradient, which involves ion exchange membranes [196]. In electrodialysis, the extraction, reconcentration and substitution operations are carried out without direct intervention of the electrodes [197]. They are placed at the end of the electrodialysis cells in order to maintain the electric potential difference between the compartments separated by the membranes (Figure 9) [197,198,199].
If we associate an anion exchange membrane with a cathode, it is possible to eliminate an electrolyte, whose cation can be deposited by electrochemical reaction on the cathode [200]. The electrolyte extracted from the diluted circuit by electrodialysis will be recovered in the concentrated circuit according to the principle in Figure 9. This electrolyte will not only be recovered but can be reconcentrated. Recovery and reconcentration are possible because the ions cannot migrate over their compartment, the M cation being retained by the anion exchange membrane, and the X anion by the cation exchange membrane [201,202].
Conducting electrodialysis requires ways to interpose electrodes, aqueous phases to be processed, and membranes, so that the operation can lead at the same time to solute concentrations or to the recovery of deionized water [203,204,205].

8.4. Membrane Processes Carried out under a Concentration Gradient (Liquid Membrane)

Although the concentration gradient is also found in processes with solid membranes (osmosis, dialysis, forward osmosis), this paper addresses processes with liquid membranes that have a high chance of developing applications in the valorization of thorium [206].
Separation systems with a liquid membrane (LM) or bulk liquid membrane (BLM) are formed by two homogenous liquid phases, immiscible with the membrane, called the source phase (SP) and the receiving phase (RP). The separation of the two liquid membranes is achieved with a third liquid, the membrane (M), which acts as a semi-permeable barrier between the two liquid phases [207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218,219,220,221,222,223,224,225,226,227,228,229,230,231].
An established graphic but also practical conception of liquid membranes (Figure 10) takes into account the density of the membrane, which is generally an organic solvent or a multicomponent system in which the continuous phase is the organic solvent [208].
The density of the membrane phase becomes unimportant if the membrane solvent is immobilized in or on a support [209], thus obtaining supported liquid membranes (SLMs). An interesting variant, but not yet sufficiently evaluated in separation processes, is the liquid membrane based on magnetic liquid (ferrofluid) [210], which also has no restrictions on the density of the organic solvent but involves special aspects in terms of stability and the transfer of table [211].
If we focus on BLMs, the technical problems to be solved are as follows: the large volume of solvent used (V), the small mass transfer area (σ), the unit ratio between the volume of the source phase, the volume of the receiving phase (r) and the volume of the membrane organic solvent (OS or M) and, therefore, implicitly, the long operating time (t) [212].
In order to improve the performance, hollow-fiber supported membranes (HFLMs) and emulsion membranes (ELMs) have been greatly developed (Figure 11) [213].
Recently, a BLM system with dispersed phases was studied, in which the aqueous phases of the separation system dispersed in/through the membranes. The membrane is a nanodispersed system of magnetic nanoparticles that have the role of ensuring both convection and transport for ionic chemical species in membranes based on saturated alcohols C6–C12 [214,215]. The most recent design is shown in Figure 12, but other variants using chemical nano-species are also used [216].
The BLM system with dispersed phases (based on Figure 8 carriers, for example) is close to the performance of liquid membranes on hollow-fiber supports or emulsion-type liquid membranes but has several limitations that restrict its applicability, including the stability of the membrane nanodispersion, control of the size of droplets in recirculating aqueous phases and losses of membrane material (solvent or nanoparticles) [217].

8.5. Transport in Liquid Membranes

The method of achieving the concentration gradient and the nature of the species dissolved in the phases of the membrane system have led to various types of transport through liquid membranes [218,219,220]. Mainly, however, they can be narrowed down to those specified in Figure 13.

8.5.1. Physical “Simple” Shipping

The simple diffusion type of transport through the solution is usually followed by the permeation of the solute through the liquid membrane due to the concentration gradient (Figure 13a). In this case, the transport of the component from the source phase through the membrane phase occurs with a higher solubility or diffusivity of the solute in the membrane phase. In this type of transport, the mass transfer rate is low and depends on the solubility of the solute in the organic phase, as well as the solubility of the solute in the source and receiver phases [221,222].

8.5.2. Facilitated Transport or Carrier-Mediated Transport

In carrier-mediated transport, a carrier is added to the membrane phase in order to increase the mass transfer rate or separation efficiency of the liquid membrane. It is also known as facilitated transport or transport mediated by a transporter [223]. In this case, the solute dissolved in the source phase, at the source phase–LM interface, reacts chemically with a transporter dissolved in the liquid membrane to form a complex. This complex reacts inversely at the LM–receiving phase interface, releasing the partitioned solute in the receiving phase (Figure 13b). In recent years, this type of transport mediated by a transporter has been intensively developed for the selective transport of cations, anions and neutral species through liquid membranes [224].

8.5.3. Coupled Co- or Counter-Transport

In this type of transport, the transport speed of a certain ion is dependent on the concentration of another ion. In the case of coupled co-transport, the metal ion is transferred together with a counter-anion, with the two species’ transport taking place in the same direction. In the coupled counter-transport type, the simultaneous transport of another ion from the receptor phase to the source phase takes place; thus, the transport of the two species takes place in opposite directions [225,226,227]. Figure 13c,d shows the types of co- and counter-coupled transport of a metal ion.

8.6. Hybrid Membrane Processes

The most common form of treatment of effluents containing heavy metal ions involves the precipitation of metals as a hydroxide, base salt or sulfur. Precipitation is often followed by an additional treatment, such as sedimentation or filtration processes [228,229,230].
The technique of liquid membranes also presents a huge potential for the application of the removal and valorization of heavy metals, especially for the purpose of environmental protection [221,222,223].
Currently, the most important commercial application of liquid membrane technologies is the treatment of wastewater and waste [212,224,225,226].
However, the use of liquid membranes has encountered many obstacles, mainly related to the use of solvents with high toxicity [227,228]; both the reduction of the amount of the membrane solvent required and their replacement with green solvents or nanodispersions have created better opportunities for this process [229,230].
The idea of using nanosystems has led to the development of hybrid processes, which basically follow the mechanism of liquid membranes, but the process design is more advanced [211,231].

9. Problems in Application and Achievement as Well as Development Perspectives of Urban Thorium Mining

The analysis of the processes in which the minerals or waste containing thorium are processed shows that the classic technologies have material losses in the environment, which could be reduced with or through membrane techniques [232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255]. Thus, in the classical thorium recovery technologies, some disadvantages [1,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66] of the operations are highlighted (Table 5), which require improvements, especially from the perspective of the loss of thorium in the environment.
The problem of thorium separation, concentration and recycling can be approached by analyzing some of the contributions that offer both priority research directions and viable technical solutions (Table 6) [232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,255].
Recent studies on the separation, concentration, removal or recovery of thorium from aqueous solutions, including by membrane techniques [256,257,258,259,260,261,262,263,264,265,266,267,268,269,270,271] (Table 7), have led to promising results, reinforcing the idea that membrane or hybrid processes can contribute to the imaging of the technological recycling of thorium from various residues, especially industrial, on municipal waste processing platforms.
The various compounds [272,273,274,275,276,277], technologies and processes [272,273,274,275,276,277,278,279,280,281,282,283,284,285] proposed recently, but also some previously used [286,287,288,289,290,291,292,293], can contribute to the construction of a scheme for recuperative separation of thorium on an integrated municipal platform for processing, mainly the waste of electrical devices (lamps, tubes and mantles) and electronics, but also those from the construction industry (welding electrodes, metallic materials and alloys).
In the diagrams in Figure 14, several proposals for technical solutions for urban thorium mining are presented, starting from the raw material: waste that ends up at integrated municipal waste management platforms.
Thus, in a first case (Figure 14a), it is assumed that the waste (assumed to be electrical and electronic waste or metal waste from metal construction materials) contains thorium and is totally unselected. This option would require the use of the classic scheme for the separation of thorium from poor sources, including the following operations: leaching, filtration (sedimentation), precipitation, filtration, solubilization at Th4+, extraction, re-extraction and ion exchange. In this operating scheme, membrane processes that can be integrated to increase the performance of the process are nanofiltration and/or liquid membranes.
A second case may be a raw material containing thorium alloyed with tungsten (filaments of incandescent lamps or other lighting fixtures, welding electrodes or building material alloys). Figure 14b shows the main operations, which consist of leaching, filtration, precipitation, filtration, nanofiltration, solubilization at Th4+, extraction and stripping or membrane electrolysis and nanofiltration.
The third possible case would be a raw material consisting of various wastes from aluminum and magnesium alloys (Figure 14c). Such a waste content can be processed for thorium recovery by membrane electrolysis or acid attack, followed by filtration and nanofiltration.
The proposed operation schemes are highly dependent on the quality of the waste selection that reaches the integrated municipal waste for management and processing platforms.
Certainly, some selection criteria for residues containing thorium can be taken into account in order to approach a treatment scheme as close as possible to the technological flows dedicated to obtaining this element.
Thus, we can consider that the entire deposit where thorium components were found, with a concentration above 1%, can be treated according to the classic acidic or basic digestion schemes.
When the waste deposit receives metal waste (residues of welding electrodes, metal alloys of thorium with aluminum or magnesium), a nitric acid digestion scheme followed by extraction and/or ion exchange will be required.

10. Conclusions

Although a radioactive element and a promising raw material for nuclear power generation, thorium, being a fairly abundant metal (similar to lead), has surprising domestic uses: toothpaste, dental cement, crucibles for high-temperature work, filaments for incandescent bulbs, welding electrodes, aluminum or magnesium alloys, jewelry, sculptures, coats and goggles, devices working at high temperatures and lamps for electronic devices.
Current regulations consider thorium to be a carcinogenic element, and its bio-toxicity and impact on human health (affects internal organs and blood) require the recovery and recycling of thorium, especially in the case of waste from municipal management platforms.
Classical thorium recovery processes require acid or base attack on thorium-containing feedstock, filtration, re-solubilization, extraction and ion exchange.
A variety of complexants and transporters have been used for the separation and preconcentration of thorium (especially for its analysis), which leads to membrane applications (nanofiltration, colloidal ultrafiltration, liquid membranes, emulsion membranes) for thorium utilization.
Membrane processes can intervene throughout the thorium recovery and recycling stream, increasing the efficiency of the process and avoiding losses to the environment.
The proposed processing schemes for various wastes containing thorium highlight the possibility of removal, recovery and valorization of thorium, suggesting possible urban mining of this element.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.T.M., A.C.N., A.R.G., V.-A.G. and G.N.; methodology P.C.A., S.-K.T. and M.-R.I.; writing—original draft preparation, G.T.M., P.C.A., S.-K.T., M.-R.I., A.C.N., A.R.G., V.-A.G. and G.N.; resources, G.N.; writing—review and editing, V.-A.G. and G.N.; supervision, A.R.G., A.C.N. and G.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AASAtomic Absorption Spectrometry
BLM (MLV)Bulk Liquid Membrane
CMEChemically Modified Electrode
CVCyclic Voltammetry
DDialysis
DMMembrane Distillation
EExtraction
EDElectrodialysis
EDIElectro-deionization
ELMEmulsion Liquid Membrane
FFiltration
GGrinding
HFLMHollow Fiber Liquid Membrane
HLMHybrid Liquid Membrane
ICP-AESInductively Coupled Plasma–Atomic Emission Spectrometry
ICP-MSInductively Coupled Plasma–Mass Spectrometry
ICP-OESInductively Coupled Plasma–Optical Emission Spectrometry
IEIon Exchange
MMilling
MFMicrofiltration
MOFMetal-Organic Framework
MUFMicellar Ultra-Filtration system
NNeutralization
NFNanofiltration
PPrecipitation
PVPervaporation
RERe-Extraction
REERare Earth Element
ROReverse Osmosis
SStriping
SGGas Separation
TBPTri-Butyl Phosphate
UFUltrafiltration

References

  1. Jyothi, R.K.; De Melo, L.G.T.C.; Santos, R.M.; Yoon, H.S. An overview of thorium as a prospective natural resource for future energy. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1132611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Takaki, N.; Mardiansah, D. Core Design and Deployment Strategy of Heavy Water Cooled Sustainable Thorium Reactor. Sustainability 2012, 4, 1933–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Takaki, N.; Sidik, P.; Sekimoto, H. Feasibility of Water Cooled Thorium Breeder Reactor Based on LWR Technology; American Nuclear Society: La Grange Park, IL, USA, 2007; pp. 1733–1738. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sidik, P.; Takaki, N.; Sekimoto, H. Feasible region of design parameters for water cooled thorium breeder reactor. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2007, 44, 946–957. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sidik, P.; Takaki, N.; Sekimoto, H. Breeding capability and void reactivity analysis of heavy-water-cooled thorium reactor. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2008, 45, 589–600. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ault, T.; Krahn, S.; Croff, A. Comparing the environmental impacts of uranium- and thorium-based fuel cycles with different recycle options. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2017, 100, 114–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Perron, R.; Gendron, D.; Causey, P.W. Construction of a thorium/actinium generator at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2020, 164, 109262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Von Gunten, H.R.; Roessler, E.; Lowson, R.T.; Reid, P.D.; Short, S.A. Distribution of uranium- and thorium series radionuclides in mineral phases of a weathered lateritic transect of a uranium ore body. Chem. Geol. 1999, 160, 225–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Thorium+reserve&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 (accessed on 24 June 2023).
  10. Available online: https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=%22Thorium%22&btnG= (accessed on 24 June 2023).
  11. Corb Aron, R.A.; Abid, A.; Vesa, C.M.; Nechifor, A.C.; Behl, T.; Ghitea, T.C.; Munteanu, M.A.; Fratila, O.; Andronie-Cioara, F.L.; Toma, M.M.; et al. Recognizing the Benefits of Pre-/Probiotics in Metabolic Syndrome and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Considering the Influence of Akkermansia muciniphila as a Key Gut Bacterium. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Phillip, E.; Choo, T.F.; Khairuddin, N.W.A.; Abdel Rahman, R.O. On the Sustainable Utilization of Geopolymers for Safe Management of Radioactive Waste: A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kusumkar, V.V.; Galamboš, M.; Viglašová, E.; Daňo, M.; Šmelková, J. Ion-Imprinted Polymers: Synthesis, Characterization, and Adsorption of Radionuclides. Materials 2021, 14, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santiago-Aliste, A.; Sánchez-Hernández, E.; Langa-Lomba, N.; González-García, V.; Casanova-Gascón, J.; Martín-Gil, J.; Martín-Ramos, P. Multifunctional Nanocarriers Based on Chitosan Oligomers and Graphitic Carbon Nitride Assembly. Materials 2022, 15, 8981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lu, D.; Qiu, Y. Synthesis of a Novel Water-Soluble Polymer Complexant Phosphorylated Chitosan for Rare Earth Complexation. Polymers 2022, 14, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Inman, G.; Nlebedim, I.C.; Prodius, D. Application of Ionic Liquids for the Recycling and Recovery of Technologically Critical and Valuable Metals. Energies 2022, 15, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brewer, A.; Florek, J.; Kleitz, F. A perspective on developing solid-phase extraction technologies for industrial-scale critical materials recovery. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 2752–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yudaev, P.; Chistyakov, E. Chelating Extractants for Metals. Metals 2022, 12, 1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Varbanov, S.; Tashev, E.; Vassilev, N.; Atanassova, M.; Lachkova, V.; Tosheva, T.; Shenkov, S.; Dukov, I. Synthesis, characterization and implementation as a synergistic agent in the solvent extraction of lanthanoids. Polyhedron 2017, 134, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiong, X.H.; Tao, Y.; Yu, Z.W.; Yang, L.X.; Sun, L.J.; Fan, Y.L.; Luo, F. Selective extraction of thorium from uranium and rare earth elements using sulfonated covalent organic framework and its membrane derivate. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 15, 123240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cazalaà, J.B. Radium and thorium applications for the general public: Unexpected consequences of the discovery from Pierre and Marie Curie. J. Am. Soc. Anesthesiol. 2012, 117, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pohjalainen, I.; Moore, I.D.; Geldhof, S.; Rosecker, V.; Sterba, J.; Schumm, T. Gas cell studies of thorium using filament dispensers at IGISOL. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2020, 484, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lavi, N.; Alfassi, Z.B. Development of Marinelli beaker standards containing thorium oxide and application for measurements of radioactive environmental samples. Radiat. Meas. 2005, 39, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Z.J.; Guo, X.; Qiu, J.; Lu, H.; Wang, J.Q.; Lin, J. Recent advances in the applications of thorium-based metal–organic frameworks and molecular clusters. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 7376–7389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hassan, H.J.; Hashim, S.; Sanusi, M.S.M.; Bradley, D.A.; Alsubaie, A.; Tenorio, R.G.; Bakri, N.F.; Tahar, R.M. The Radioactivity of Thorium Incandescent Gas Lantern Mantles. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Das, S.; Kaity, S.; Kumar, R.; Banerjee, J.; Roy, S.B.; Chaudhari, G.P.; Daniel, B.S.S. Determination of Room Temperature Thermal Conductivity of Thorium—Uranium Alloys. In Thorium—Energy for the Future: Select Papers from ThEC15; Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 277–286. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dabare, P.R.; Mahakumara, P.D.; Mahawatte, P. Method Validation of In-Situ Gamma Spectroscopy for Quantification of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) K-40, TH-232 and U-238 in Soil. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Material (NORM) in Industry, Vienna, Austria, 18–30 October 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. Vasiliev, A.N.; Severin, A.; Lapshina, E.; Chernykh, E.; Ermolaev, S.; Kalmykov, S. Hydroxyapatite particles as carriers for 223 Ra. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2017, 311, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peterson, S.; Adams, R.E.; Douglas, D.A., Jr. Properties of Thorium, Its Alloys, and Its Compounds 1965, (No. ORNL-TM-1144), Oak Ridge National Lab., Tenn. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4622065 (accessed on 24 June 2023).
  30. Zhang, Y.; Shao, X.; Yin, L.; Ji, Y. Estimation of Inhaled Effective Doses of Uranium and Thorium for Workers in Bayan Obo Ore and the Surrounding Public, Inner Mongolia, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Stojsavljević, A.; Borković-Mitić, S.; Vujotić, L.; Grujičić, D.; Gavrović-Jankulović, M.; Manojlović, D. The human biomonitoring study in Serbia: Background levels for arsenic, cadmium, lead, thorium and uranium in the whole blood of adult Serbian population. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 169, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). ICRP Publication 142: Radiological protection from naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) in industrial processes. Ann. ICRP 2019, 48, 5–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guo, P.; Duan, T.; Song, X.; Xu, J.; Chen, H. Effects of soil pH and organic matter on distribution of thorium fractions in soil contaminated by rare-earth industries. Talanta 2008, 77, 624–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hayes, C.T.; Fitzsimmons, J.N.; Boyle, E.A.; McGee, D.; Anderson, R.F.; Weisend, R.; Morton, P.L. Thorium isotopes tracing the iron cycle at the Hawaii Ocean Time-series Station ALOHA. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 169, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Suarez-Navarro, J.A.; Pujol, L.; Suarez-Navarro, M.J. Determination of specific alpha-emitting radionuclides (uranium, plutonium, thorium and polonium) in water using [Ba+Fe]-coprecipitation method. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 130, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chaudhury, D.; Sen, U.; Sahoo, B.K.; Bhat, N.N.; Kumara, S.; Karunakara, N.; Biswas, S.; Shenoy, S.; Bose, B. Thorium promotes lung, liver and kidney damage in BALB/c mouse via alterations in antioxidant systems. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2022, 363, 109977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wickstroem, K.; Hagemann, U.B.; Kristian, A.; Ellingsen, C.; Sommer, A.; Ellinger-Ziegelbauer, H.; Wirnitzer, U.; Hagelin, E.-M.; Larsen, A.; Smeets, R.; et al. Preclinical Combination Studies of an FGFR2 Targeted Thorium-227 Conjugate and the ATR Inhibitor BAY 1895344. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019, 105, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Yantasee, W.; Sangvanich, T.; Creim, J.A.; Pattamakomsan, K.; Wiacek, R.J.; Fryxell, G.E.; Addleman, R.S.; Timchalk, C. Functional sorbents for selective capture of plutonium, americium, uranium, and thorium in blood. Health Phys. 2010, 99, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kumar, A.; Mishra, P.; Ghosh, S.; Sharma, P.; Ali, M.; Pandey, B.N.; Mishra, K.P. Thorium-induced oxidative stress mediated toxicity in mice and its abrogation by diethylenetriamine pentaacetate. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2008, 84, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, X.A.; Cheng, Y.E.; Rong, Z. Recent results from a study of thorium lung burdens and health effects among miners in China. J. Radiol. Prot. 2005, 25, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zapadinskaia, E.E.; Gasteva, G.N.; Titiova, I.N. Analysis of health state in individuals exposed to thorium and chemical hazards in occupational environment. Med. Tr. Promyshlennaia Ekol. 2005, 11, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  42. Polednak, A.P.; Stehney, A.F.; Lucas, H.F. Mortality among male workers at a thorium-processing plant. Health Phys. 1983, 44, 239–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yin, L.L.; Tian, Q.; Shao, X.Z.; Shen, B.M.; Su, X.; Ji, Y.Q. ICP-MS measurement of uranium and thorium contents in minerals in China. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 2016, 27, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shao, X.Z.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, L.L.; Kong, X.Y.; Ji, Y.Q. Monitoring of ultra-trace uranium and thorium in six-grade particles. Chemosphere 2019, 233, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sharmin, F.; Ovi, M.H.; Shelley, A. Radiotoxicity analysis of the spent nuclear fuel of VVER-1200 reactor. Prog. Nucl. Energy 2023, 156, 104538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gao, L.; Kano, N.; Sato, Y.; Li, C.; Zhang, S.; Imaizumi, H. Behavior and distribution of heavy metals including rare earth elements, thorium, and uranium in sludge from industry water treatment plant and recovery method of metals by biosurfactants application. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2012, 2012, 173819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lapidus, G.T.; Doyle, F.M. Selective thorium and uranium extraction from monazite: I. Single-stage oxalate leaching. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 154, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lapidus, G.T.; Doyle, F.M. Selective thorium and uranium extraction from monazite: II. Approaches to enhance the removal of radioactive contaminants. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 155, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. El-Nadi, Y.A.; Daoud, J.A.; Aly, H.F. Modified leaching and extraction of uranium from hydrous oxide cake of Egyptian monazite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2005, 76, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Amer, T.E.; Abdella, W.M.; Wahab, G.M.A.; El-Sheikh, E.M. A suggested alternative procedure for processing of monazite mineral concentrate. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 125, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Eyal, Y.; Olander, D.R. Leaching of uranium and thorium from monazite: I. Initial leaching. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 1867–1877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Borai, E.H.; Abd El-Ghany, M.S.; Ahmed, I.M.; Hamed, M.M.; Shahr El-Din, A.M.; Aly, H.F. Modified acidic leaching for selective separation of thorium, phosphate and rare earth concentrates from Egyptian crude monazite. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2016, 149, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Parzentny, H.R.; Róg, L. The Role of Mineral Matter in Concentrating Uranium and Thorium in Coal and Combustion Residues from Power Plants in Poland. Minerals 2019, 9, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Selvig, L.K.; Inn, K.G.W.; Outola, I.M.J.; Kurosaki, H.; Lee, K.A. Dissolution of resistate minerals containing uranium and thorium: Environmental implications. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2005, 263, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hamed, M.G.; El-khalafawy, A.; Youssef, M.A.; Borai, E.H. Competitive sorption behavior of mono, di, and trivalent ions in highly acidic waste by polymeric resin based on crotonic acid prepared by gamma radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2023, 212, 111159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shaeri, M.; Torab-Mostaedi, M.; Rahbar Kelishami, A. Solvent extraction of thorium from nitrate medium by TBP, Cyanex272 and their mixture. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2015, 303, 2093–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nasab, M.E. Solvent extraction separation of uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) with neutral organophosphorus and amine ligands. Fuel 2015, 116, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alex, P.; Hubli, R.C.; Suri, A.K. Processing of rare earth concentrates. Rare Met. 2005, 24, 210–215. [Google Scholar]
  59. Panda, R.; Kumari, A.; Jha, M.K.; Hait, J.; Kumar, V.; Kumar, J.R.; Lee, J.Y. Leaching of rare earth metals (REMs) from Korean monazite concentrate. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2035–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kul, M.; Topkaya, Y.; Karakaya, I. Rare earth double sulfates from pre-concentrated bastnasite. Hydrometallurgy 2008, 93, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fourest, B.; Lagarde, G.; Perrone, J.; Brandel, V.; Dacheux, N.; Genet, M. Solubility of thorium phosphate-diphosphate. New J. Chem. 1999, 23, 645–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Chi, R.; Xu, Z. A solution chemistry approach to the study of rare earth element precipitation by oxalic acid. Met. Mater. Trans. B 1999, 30, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tomazic, B.; Branica, M. Separation of uranium(VI) from rare earths(III) by hydrolytic precipitation. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. Lett. 1968, 4, 377–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kang, M.J.; Han, B.E.; Hahn, P.S. Precipitation and adsorption of uranium (VI) under various aqueous conditions. Environ. Eng. Res. 2002, 7, 149–157. [Google Scholar]
  65. Bearse, A.E.; Calkins, G.D.; Clegg, J.W.; Filbert, J.R.B. Thorium and rare earths from monazite. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1954, 50, 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  66. Crouse, D.J.; Brown, K.B. The Amex Process for Extracting Thorium Ores with Alkyl Amines. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1959, 51, 1461–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wang, X.; Huang, W.; Gong, Y.; Jiang, F.; Zheng, H.; Zhu, T.; Long, D.; Li, Q. Electrochemical behavior of Th (IV) and its electrodeposition from ThF4-LiCl-KCl melt. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 196, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kumar, R.; Gupta, S.; Wajhal, S.; Satpati, S.K.; Sahu, M.L. Effect of process parameters on the recovery of thorium tetrafluoride prepared by hydrofluorination of thorium oxide, and their optimization. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2022, 54, 1560–1569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Udayakumar, S.; Baharun, N.; Rezan, S.A.; Ismail, A.F.; Takip, K.M. Economic evaluation of thorium oxide production from monazite using alkaline fusion method. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2021, 53, 2418–2425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bahri, C.N.A.C.Z.; Al-Areqi, W.M.; Majid, A.A.; Ruf, M.I.F.M. Production of rare earth elements from Malaysian monazite by selective precipitation. Malays. J. Anal. Sci. 2016, 20, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Megawati, H.P.; Prasetiawan, H.; Triwibowo, B.; Hisyam, A. Simulation Study of Thorium Separation from Monazite Mineral. In Proceedings of the 7th Engineering International Conference on Education, Concept and Application on Green Technology (EIC 2018), Semarang, Indonesia, 18 October 2018; pp. 455–459, ISBN 978-989-758-411-4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cabral, A.R.; Zeh, A. Karst-bauxite formation during the Great Oxidation Event indicated by dating of authigenic rutile and its thorium content. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hak, C.R.C.; Januri, Z.; Mustapha, I.; Mahat, S. Extraction of Thorium Oxide (ThO2) from Malaysian Monazite through Alkali Digestion: Physical and Chemical Characterization Using X-Ray Analysis. Key Eng. Mater. 2022, 908, 509–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alotaibi, A.M.; Ismail, A.F.; Aziman, E.S. Ultra-effective modified clinoptilolite adsorbent for selective thorium removal from radioactive residue. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Manchanda, V.K. Thorium as an abundant source of nuclear energy and challenges in separation science. Radiochim. Acta 2023, 111, 243–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rump, A.; Hermann, C.; Lamkowski, A.; Popp, T.; Port, M. A comparison of the chemo-and radiotoxicity of thorium and uranium at different enrichment grades. Arch. Toxicol. 2023, 97, 1577–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Schmidt, M.; Lee, S.S.; Wilson, R.E.; Soderholm, L.; Fenter, P. Sorption of tetravalent thorium on muscovite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 88, 66–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chadirji-Martinez, K.; Grosvenor, A.P.; Crawford, A.; Chernikov, R.; Heredia, E.; Feng, R.; Pan, Y. Thorium speciation in synthetic anhydrite: Implications for remediation and recovery of thorium from rare-earth mine tailings. Hydrometallurgy 2022, 214, 105965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Khan, A.A.; Zada, Z.; Reshak, A.H.; Ishaq, M.; Zada, S.; Saqib, M.; Ismail, M.; Fazal-ur-Rehman, M.; Murtaza, G.; Zada, S.; et al. GGA and GGA + U Study of ThMn2Si2 and ThMn2Ge2 Compounds in a Body-Centered Tetragonal Ferromagnetic Phase. Molecules 2022, 27, 7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nisbet, H.; Migdisov, A.; Xu, H.; Guo, X.; van Hinsberg, V.; Williams-Jones, A.E.; Boukhalfa, H.; Roback, R. An experimental study of the solubility and speciation of thorium in chloride-bearing aqueous solutions at temperatures up to 250 C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 239, 363–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Oliveira, M.S.; Duarte, I.M.; Paiva, A.V.; Yunes, S.N.; Almeida, C.E. The role of chemical interactions between thorium, cerium, and lanthanum in lymphocyte toxicity. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2014, 69, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Peng, C.; Ding, Y.; He, X.; Zhang, P.; Li, N.; Lan, T.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z. Toxicity of cerium and thorium on daphnia magna. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 134, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Peng, C.; Ma, Y.; Ding, Y.; He, X.; Zhang, P.; Lan, T.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Z. Influence of Speciation of Thorium on Toxic Effects to Green Algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Hirose, K. Chemical speciation of trace metals in seawater: A review. Anal. Sci. 2006, 22, 1055–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Huang, W.; Hongwei, L.; Xin, X.; Guocheng, W. Development status and research progress in rare earth hydrometallurgy in China. J. Chin. Rare Earth Soc. Chin. 2006, 24, 129. [Google Scholar]
  86. Santschi, P.H.; Murray, J.W.; Baskaran, M.; Benitez-Nelson, C.R.; Guo, L.D.; Hung, C.C.; Lamborg, C.; Moran, S.B.; Passow, U.; Roy-Barman, M. Thorium speciation in seawater. Mar. Chem. 2006, 100, 250–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vengosh, A.; Coyte, R.M.; Podgorski, J.; Johnson, T.M. A critical review on the occurrence and distribution of the uranium-and thorium-decay nuclides and their effect on the quality of groundwater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 808, 151914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Rao, T.P.; Metilda, P.; Gladis, J.M. Overview of analytical methodologies for sea water analysis: Part I—Metals. Crit. Rev. in Anal. Chem. 2005, 35, 247–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Niazi, A.; Ghasemi, N.; Goodarzi, M.; Ebadi, A. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of uranium and thorium using arsenazo III by H-point standard addition method and partial least squares regression. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2007, 54, 411–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sai, Y.; Zhang, J. Spectrophotometric Determination of Microamounts of Thorium with 3,5-Dibromosalicylfluorone by Ion-exchange Separation. Spectrosc. Spectr. Anal. 2001, 21, 843–845. [Google Scholar]
  91. Xia, C.B. Spectrophotometric Determination of Trace Thorium in Coal Gangue. Chin. J. Rare Met. 2003, 27, 416–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Pavón, J.L.P.; Cordero, B.M. Micellar systems in flow injection: Determination of gadolinium with 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol in the presence of Triton X-100. Analyst 1992, 117, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Khan, M.H.; Hafeez, M.; Bukhari, S.M.H.; Ali, A. Spectrophotometric determination of microamounts of thorium with thorin in the presence of cetylpyridinium chloride as surfactant in perchloric acid. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2014, 301, 703–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Agnihotri, N.K.; Singh, V.K.; Singh, H.B. Simultaneous derivative spectrophotometric determination of thorium and uranium in a micellar medium. Talanta 1993, 40, 1851–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Abu-Bakr, M.S.; Sedaira, H.; Hashem, E.Y. Complexation equilibria and spectrophotometric determination of iron (III) with 1-amino-4-hydroxyanthraquinone. Talanta 1994, 41, 1669–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ramesh, A.; Krishnamacharyulu, J.; Ravindranath, L.K.; Brahmaji Rao, S. Simultaneous determination of uranium and thorium using 4-(2′-thiazolylazo) resacetophenone oxime as analytical reagent. A derivative spectrophotometric method. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1993, 170, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kuroda, R.; Kurosaki, M.; Hayashibe, Y.; Ishimaru, S. Simultaneous determination of uranium and thorium with Arsenazo III by second-derivative spectrophotometry. Talanta 1990, 37, 619–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sharma, C.; Eshwar, M. Rapid spectrophotometric determination of thorium (IV) with 1-(2′-thiazolylazo)-2-naphthol. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 1985, 91, 323–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mori, I.; Fujita, Y.; Fujita, K.; Kitano, S.; Ogawa, I.; Kawabe, H.; Koshiyama, Y.; Tanaka, T. Color reaction among pyrogallol red, thorium (IV) and samarium (III), and its application to the determination of these metals. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1986, 59, 955–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Jarosz, M. Study of ternary thorium complexes with some triphenylmethane reagents and cationic surfactants. Analyst 1986, 111, 681–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Mori, I.; Fujita, Y.; Sakaguchi, K. Solvent extraction and spectrophotometry of Th (IV) with 3,4,5,6-tetrachlorogallein in the presence of La (III) and cetyltrimethylammonium chloride. Bunseki Kagaku 1982, 31, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zaki, M.T.M.; El-Sayed, A.Y. Determination of thorium using phenylfluorone and quercetin in the presence of surfactants and protective colloids. Anal. Lett. 1995, 28, 1525–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Dacheux, N.; Aupiais, J. Determination of uranium, thorium, plutonium, americium, and curium ultratraces by photon electron rejecting α liquid scintillation. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2275–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Amrane, M.; Oufni, L. Determination for levels of uranium and thorium in water along Oum Er-Rabia River using alpha track detectors. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 2017, 10, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pantelica, A.I.; Georgesecu, I.; Murariu-magureanu, D.M.; Margaritescu, I.; Cincu, E. Thorium determination in intercomparison samples and in some Romanian building materials by gamma ray spectrometry. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 2001, 97, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Chapter 58. Thorium. Compr. Anal. Chem. 1996, 30, 721–728. [CrossRef]
  107. Rao, T.P.; Metilda, P.; Gladis, J.M. Preconcentration techniques for uranium(VI) and thorium(IV) prior to analytical determination—An overview. Talanta 2006, 68, 1047–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. De Carvalho, M.S.; Domingues, M.D.L.F.; Mantovano, J.L.; Da Cunha, J.W.S.D. Preconcentration method for the determination of thorium in natural water by wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2002, 253, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Misra, N.L.; Dhara, S.; Adya, V.C.; Godbole, S.V.; Mudher, K.S.; Aggarwal, S.K. Trace element determination in thorium oxide using total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2008, 63, 81–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kasar, S.; Murugan, R.; Arae, H.; Aono, T.; Sahoo, S.K. A Microwave Digestion Technique for the Analysis of Rare Earth Elements, Thorium and Uranium in Geochemical Certified Reference Materials and Soils by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry. Molecules 2020, 25, 5178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mas, J.L.; Villa, M.; Hurtado, S.; García-Tenorio, R. Determination of trace element concentrations and stable lead, uranium and thorium isotope ratios by quadrupole-ICP-MS in NORM and NORM-polluted sample leachates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 205–206, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kulkarni, M.J.; Argekar, A.A.; Mathur, J.N.; Page, A.G. Chemical separation and inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometric determination of seventeen trace metals in thorium oxide matrix using a novel extractant–Cyanex-923. Anal. Chim. Acta 1998, 370, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Luo, Y.; Cong, H.X.; Zhao, Z.Q.; Hu, W.Q.; Zhou, W.; He, S.H. ICP-AES with MSF for Determination of Th and U. J. Nucl. Radiochem. 2015, 37, 37–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Hou, L.Q.; Luo, S.H.; Wang, S.A.; Sheng, H.W.; Xi, Y.F. Determination of trace thorium in uranium dioxide by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. Metall. Anal. 2006, 26, 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  115. Ayranov, M.; Cobos, J.; Popa, K.; Rondinella, V.V. Determination of REE, U, Th, Ba, and Zr in simulated hydrogeological leachates by ICP-AES after matrix solvent extraction. J. Rare Earths 2009, 27, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Casartelli, E.A.; Miekeley, N. Determination of thorium and light rare-earth elements in soil water and its high molecular mass organic fractions by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and on-line-coupled size-exclusion chromatography. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. She, Z.; Li, M.; Feng, Z.; Xu, Y.; Wang, M.; Pan, X.; Yang, Z. Determination of Trace Thorium and Uranium Impurities in Scandium with High Matrix by ICP-OES. Materials 2023, 16, 3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Aydin, F.A.; Soylak, M. Separation, preconcentration and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometric (ICP-MS) determination of thorium(IV), titanium(IV), iron(III), lead(II) and chromium(III) on 2-nitroso-1-naphthol impregnated MCI GEL CHP20P resin. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 173, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Purohit, P.J.; Goyal, N.; Thulasidas, S.K.; Page, A.G.; Sastry, M.D. Electrothermal vaporization—Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry for trace metal determination in uranium and thorium compounds without prior matrix separation. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2000, 55, 1257–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Castro, M.A.; García-Olalla, C.; Robles, L.C.; Aller, A.J. Behavior of thorium, zirconium, and vanadium as chemical modifiers in the determination of arsenic by electrothermal atomization atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2002, 57, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Casadio, S.; Lorenzinl, L. Cyclic voltammetric behavior of uranyl ion in sulfuric acid solutions. Application to some nuclear materials characterization. Anal. Lett. 1973, 6, 809–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Jin, L.T.; Shan, Y.; Tong, W.; Fang, Y.Z. Determination of thorium by adsorptive type chemically modified electrode with a polycomplex system. Microchim. Acta 1989, 97, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wen, J.; Dong, L.; Hu, S.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Wang, X. Fluorogenic thorium sensors based on 2,6-pyridinedicarboxylic acid-substituted tetraphenylethenes with aggregation-induced emission characteristics. Chem. Asian J. 2016, 11, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Safavi, A.; Sadeghi, M. Design and evaluation of a thorium (IV) selective optode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 567, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Mirza, M.A.; Khuhawar, M.Y.; Arain, R.; Ch, M.A. Micellar electrokinetic chromatographic analysis of thorium, uranium, copper, nickel, cobalt and iron in ore and fish samples. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Sarkar, A.; Alamelu, D.; Aggarwal, S.K. Determination of trace constituents in thoria by laser induced breakdown spectrometry. J. Nucl. Mater. 2009, 384, 158–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Sarkar, A.; Alamelu, D.; Aggarwal, S.K. Determination of thorium and uranium in solution by laser-induced breakdown spectrometry. Appl. Opt. 2008, 47, G58–G64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Kadish, K.M.; Liu, Y.H.; Anderson, J.E.; Dormond, A.; Belkalem, M.; Guilard, R. Electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical studies of bis(diketonate) thorium(IV) and uranium(IV) porphyrins. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1989, 163, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. De Diego Almeida, R.H.; Monroy-Guzmán, F.; Juárez, C.R.A.; Rocha, J.M.; Bustos, E.B. Electrochemical detector based on a modified graphite electrode with phthalocyanine for the elemental analysis of actinides. Chemosphere 2021, 276, 130114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Moghaddam, Z.S.; Kaykhaii, M.; Khajeh, M.; Oveisi, A.R. Synthesis of UiO-66-OH zirconium metal-organic framework and its application for selective extraction and trace determination of thorium in water samples by spectrophotometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2018, 194, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Pakhui, G.; Ghosh, S.; Reddy, B.P. Th4+|Th couple in LiCl-KCl eutectic: Anodic polarization of thorium and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy study at tungsten, cadmium and thorium electrodes. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 295, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Akhila Maheswari, M.; Prabhakaran, D.; Subramanian, M.S.; Sivaraman, N.; Srinivasan, T.G.; Vasudeva Rao, P.R. High performance liquid chromatographic studies on lanthanides, uranium and thorium on amide modified reversed phase supports. Talanta 2007, 72, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Shimada-Fujiwara, A.; Hoshi, A.; Kameo, Y.; Nakashima, M. Influence of hydrofluoric acid on extraction of thorium using a commercially available extraction chromatographic resin. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 4125–4127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Radchenko, V.; Engle, J.W.; Wilson, J.J.; Maassen, J.R.; Nortier, F.M.; Taylor, W.A.; Birnbaum, E.R.; Hudston, L.A.; John, K.D.; Fassbender, M.E. Application of ion exchange and extraction chromatography to the separation of actinium from proton-irradiated thorium metal for analytical purposes. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1380, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Singh, D.; Basu, S.; Mishra, B.; Prusty, S.; Kundu, T.; Rao, R. Textural and Chemical Characters of Lean Grade Placer Monazite of Bramhagiri Coast, Odisha, India. Minerals 2023, 13, 742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lazar, M.M.; Ghiorghita, C.-A.; Dragan, E.S.; Humelnicu, D.; Dinu, M.V. Ion-Imprinted Polymeric Materials for Selective Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution. Molecules 2023, 28, 2798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lee, J.; Yi, S.C. Accurate measurement of uranium and thorium in naturally occurring radioactive materials to overcome complex matrix interference. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2023, 193, 110649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Dumpala, R.M.R.; Sahu, M.; Nagar, B.K.; Raut, V.V.; Raje, N.H.; Rawat, N.; Subbiah, J.; Saxena, M.K.; Tomar, B.S. Accountancy for intrinsic colloids on thorium solubility: The fractionation of soluble species and the characterization of solubility limiting phase. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 129327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Zhijun, G.; Wangsuo, W.; Dadong, S.; Minyu, T. Liquid-liquid extraction of uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) by two open-chain crown ethers with terminal quinolyl groups in chloroform. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2003, 258, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Metaxas, M.; Kasselouri-Rigopoulou, V.; Galiatsatou, P.; Konstantopoulou, C.; Oikonomou, D. Thorium Removal by Different Adsorbents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2003, 97, 71–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Alotaibi, A.M.; Ismail, A.F. Modification of Clinoptilolite as a Robust Adsorbent for Highly-Efficient Removal of Thorium (IV) from Aqueous Solutions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Felix, C.S.A.; Chagas, A.V.B.; de Jesus, R.F.; Barbosa, W.T.; Barbosa, J.D.V.; Ferreira, S.L.C.; Cerdà, V. Synthesis and Application of a New Polymer with Imprinted Ions for the Preconcentration of Uranium in Natural Water Samples and Determination by Digital Imaging. Molecules 2023, 28, 4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Liu, H.; Qi, C.; Feng, Z.; Lei, L.; Deng, S. Adsorption of Trace Thorium (IV) from Aqueous Solution by Mono-Modified β-Cyclodextrin Polyrotaxane Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2017, 314, 1607–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ansari, S.A.; Mohapatra, P.K.; Manchanda, V.K. A Novel Malonamide Grafted Polystyrene-Divinyl Benzene Resin for Extraction, Pre-Concentration and Separation of Actinides. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Karmakar, R.; Singh, P.; Sen, K. Selectivity of Th (IV) Adsorption as Compared to U (VI), La (III), Ce (III), Sm (III) and Gd (III) Using Mesoporous Al2O3. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 2369–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kukkonen, E.; Virtanen, E.J.; Moilanen, J.O. α-Aminophosphonates, -Phosphinates, and -Phosphine Oxides as Extraction and Precipitation Agents for Rare Earth Metals, Thorium, and Uranium: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 3465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Georgiou, E.; Pashalidis, I.; Raptopoulos, G.; Paraskevopoulou, P. Efficient Removal of Polyvalent Metal Ions (Eu(III) and Th(IV)) from Aqueous Solutions by Polyurea-Crosslinked Alginate Aerogels. Gels 2022, 8, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Liao, W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Lu, Y. CN105734286A—Method for Separating Cerium-Fluoride and Thorium. China Patent CN105734286A, 11 December 2014. [Google Scholar]
  149. Lu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Liao, W. Extraction and recovery of cerium(IV) and thorium(IV) from sulphate medium by an α-aminophosphonate extractant. J. Rare Earths 2017, 35, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wei, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xue, T.; Kuang, S.; Liao, W. Selective Extraction and Separation of Ce (IV) and Th (IV) from RE(III) in Sulfate Medium Using Di(2-Ethylhexyl)-N-Heptylaminomethylphosphonate. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2017, 35, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kuang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Wei, H.; Liao, W. Selective Extraction and Separation of Ce(IV) from Thorium and Trivalent Rare Earths in Sulfate Medium by an α-Aminophosphonate Extractant. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kuang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wei, H.; Liao, W. Extraction and Separation of Heavy Rare Earths from Chloride Medium by α-Aminophosphonic Acid HEHAPP. J. Rare Earths 2018, 36, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Bian, X.; Liao, W. Solvent Extraction and Separation of Rare Earths from Chloride Media Using α-Aminophosphonic Acid Extractant HEHAMP. Solvent Extr. Ion Exch. 2018, 36, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Kaygun, A.K.; Akyil, S. Study of the Behaviour of Thorium Adsorption on PAN/Zeolite Composite Adsorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 147, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Al-shaybe, M.; Khalili, F. Adsorption of Thorium (IV) and Uranium (VI) by Tulul Al- Shabba Zeolitic Tuff, Jordan. Jordan J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2009, 2, 108–119. [Google Scholar]
  156. Khazaei, Y.; Faghihian, H.; Kamali, M. Removal of Thorium from Aqueous Solutions by Sodium Clinoptilolite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2011, 289, 529–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Nurliati, G.; Krisnandi, Y.K.; Sihombing, R.; Salimin, Z. Studies of Modification of Zeolite by Tandem Acid-Base Treatments and Its Adsorptions Performance towards Thorium. At. Indones. 2015, 41, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Akl, Z.F.; Hegazy, M.A. Selective cloud point extraction of thorium (IV) using tetraazonium based ionic liquid. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Varala, S.; Kumari, A.; Dharanija, B.; Bhargava, S.K.; Parthasarathy, R.; Satyavathi, B. Removal of thorium (IV) from aqueous solutions by deoiled karanja seed cake: Optimization using Taguchi method, equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 405–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Humelnicu, D.; Bulgariu, L.; Macoveanu, M. On the retention of uranyl and thorium ions from radioactive solution on peat moss. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 782–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Scandura, G.; Eid, S.; Alnajjar, A.A.; Paul, T.; Karanikolos, G.N.; Shetty, D.; Omer, K.; Alqerem, R.; Juma, A.; Wang, H.; et al. Photo-responsive metal–organic frameworks–design strategies and emerging applications in photocatalysis and adsorption. Mater. Adv. 2023, 4, 1258–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Wang, X.; Zheng, H.; Xu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Jiang, F.; She, C.; Wang, C.; Cong, H.; Gong, Y.; Huang, W.; et al. Electrochemical behaviors and electrolytic separation of Th (IV) and Ce (III) in ThF4-CeF3-LiCl-KCl quaternary melt. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 210, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gomaa, H.; Emran, M.Y.; Elsenety, M.M.; Abdel-Rahim, R.D.; Deng, Q.; Gadallah, M.I.; Saad, M.; ALMohiy, H.; Ali, H.R.H.; Faraghally, F.A.; et al. Selective removal of thorium ions from aqueous solutions using a hybrid mesoporous adsorbent as benzenesulfonamide-derivative@ZrO2. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 51, 103436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Allam, E.M.; Lashen, T.A.; Abou El-Enein, S.A.; Hassanin, M.A.; Sakr, A.K.; Cheira, M.F.; Almuqrin, A.; Hanfi, M.Y.; Sayyed, M.I. Rare Earth Group Separation after Extraction Using Sodium Diethyldithiocarbamate/Polyvinyl Chloride from Lamprophyre Dykes Leachate. Materials 2022, 15, 1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhao, D.; Yu, S.; Jiang, W.-J.; Cai, Z.-H.; Li, D.-L.; Liu, Y.-L.; Chen, Z.-Z. Recent Progress in Metal-Organic Framework Based Fluorescent Sensors for Hazardous Materials Detection. Molecules 2022, 27, 2226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Talan, D.; Huang, Q. Separation of Radionuclides from a Rare Earth-Containing Solution by Zeolite Adsorption. Minerals 2021, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Atanassova, M. Assessment of the Equilibrium Constants of Mixed Complexes of Rare Earth Elements with Acidic (Chelating) and Organophosphorus Ligands. Separations 2022, 9, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Atanassova, M. Thenoyltrifluoroacetone: Preferable Molecule for Solvent Extraction of Metals—Ancient Twists to New Approaches. Separations 2022, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Salah, B.A.; Gaber, M.S.; Kandil, A.h.T. The Removal of Uranium and Thorium from Their Aqueous Solutions by 8-Hydroxyquinoline Immobilized Bentonite. Minerals 2019, 9, 626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nechifor, A.C.; Cotorcea, S.; Bungău, C.; Albu, P.C.; Pașcu, D.; Oprea, O.; Grosu, A.R.; Pîrțac, A.; Nechifor, G. Removing of the Sulfur Compounds by Impregnated Polypropylene Fibers with Silver Nanoparticles-Cellulose Derivatives for Air Odor Correction. Membranes 2021, 11, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Ibrar, I.; Yadav, S.; Naji, O.; Alanezi, A.A.; Ghaffour, N.; Déon, S.; Subbiah, S.; Altaee, A. Development in forward Osmosis-Membrane distillation hybrid system for wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 286, 120498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Imtiaz, A.; Othman, M.H.D.; Jilani, A.; Khan, I.U.; Kamaludin, R.; Iqbal, J.; Al-Sehemi, A.G. Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions of Membrane Technology for Natural Gas Purification: A Critical Review. Membranes 2022, 12, 646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Cimbru, A.M.; Rikabi, A.A.K.K.; Oprea, O.; Grosu, A.R.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Simonescu, M.C.; Pașcu, D.; Grosu, V.-A.; Dumitru, F.; Nechifor, G. pH and pCl Operational Parameters in Some Metallic Ions Separation with Composite Chitosan/Sulfonated Polyether Ether Ketone/Polypropylene Hollow Fibers Membranes. Membranes 2022, 12, 833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Paun, G.; Neagu, E.; Parvulescu, V.; Anastasescu, M.; Petrescu, S.; Albu, C.; Nechifor, G.; Radu, G.L. New Hybrid Nanofiltration Membranes with Enhanced Flux and Separation Performances Based on Polyphenylene Ether-Ether-Sulfone/Polyacrylonitrile/SBA-15. Membranes 2022, 12, 689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Baker, W. Membrane Technology and Applications, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2012; pp. 148–149. ISBN 9780470743720. [Google Scholar]
  176. Mulder, M. The Use of Membrane Processes in Environmental Problems. An Introduction. In Membrane Processes in Separation and Purification; NATO ASI Series (Series E: Applied Sciences); Crespo, J.G., Böddeker, K.W., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994; Volume 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Strathmann, H.; Giorno, L.; Drioli, E. Introduction to Membrane Science and Technology; Institute on Membrane Technology, CNR-ITMat University of Calabria: Rende, Italy, 2011; pp. 27–58. [Google Scholar]
  178. Van Der Bruggen, B.; Vandecasteele, C.; Van Gestel, T.; Doyen, W.; Leysen, R. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ. Prog. 2003, 22, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Drioli, E.; Stankiewicz, A.I.; Macedonio, F. Membrane engineering in process intensification—An overview. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 380, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Iulianelli, A.; Drioli, E. Membrane engineering: Latest advancements in gas separation and pre-treatment processes, petrochemical industry and refinery, and future perspectives in emerging applications. Fuel Process. Technol. 2020, 206, 106464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Li, N.N.; Fane, A.G.; Ho, W.W.; Matsuura, T. (Eds.) Advanced Membrane Technology and Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011; Available online: https://toc.library.ethz.ch/objects/pdf/e16_978-0-471-73167-2_01.pdf (accessed on 24 June 2023).
  182. Drioli, E.; Criscuoli, A.; Curcio, E. Membrane Contactors: Fundamentals, Applications and Potentialities; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  183. Bernardoa, P.; Drioli, E. Membrane Gas Separation Progresses for Process Intensification Strategy in the Petrochemical Industry. Pet. Chem. 2010, 50, 271–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Van der Bruggen, B.; Lejon, L.; Vandecasteele, C. Reuse, treatment, and discharge of the concentrate of pressure-driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 3733–3738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Van der Bruggen, B.; Everaert, K.; Wilms, D.; Vandecasteele, C. Application of nanofiltration for the removal of pesticides, nitrate and hardness from ground water: Retention properties and economic evaluation. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 193, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Peng, N.; Widjojo, N.; Sukitpaneenit, P.; Teoh, M.M.; Lipscomb, G.G.; Chung, T.S.; Lai, J.Y. Evolution of polymeric hollow fibers as sustainable technologies: Past, present, and future. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012, 37, 1401–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Kamolov, A.; Turakulov, Z.; Rejabov, S.; Díaz-Sainz, G.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Norkobilov, A.; Fallanza, M.; Irabien, A. Decarbonization of Power and Industrial Sectors: The Role of Membrane Processes. Membranes 2023, 13, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Zanco, S.E.; Pérez-Calvo, J.-F.; Gasós, A.; Cordiano, B.; Becattini, V.; Mazzotti, M. Postcombustion CO2 Capture: A Comparative Techno-Economic Assessment of Three Technologies Using a Solvent, an Adsorbent, and a Membrane. ACS Eng. Au 2021, 1, 50–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rahman, T.U.; Roy, H.; Islam, M.R.; Tahmid, M.; Fariha, A.; Mazumder, A.; Tasnim, N.; Pervez, M.N.; Cai, Y.; Naddeo, V.; et al. The Advancement in Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) Technology toward Sustainable Industrial Wastewater Management. Membranes 2023, 13, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Dunn, R.O., Jr.; Scamehorn, J.F.; Christian, S.D. Use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organics from aqueous streams. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1985, 20, 257–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Christian, S.D.; Bhat, S.N.; Tucker, E.E.; Scamehorn, J.F.; El-Sayed, D.A. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration of chromate anion from aqueous streams. AIChE J. 1988, 34, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Dunn, R.O., Jr.; Scamehorn, J.F.; Christian, S.D. Concentration polarization effects in the use of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration to remove dissolved organic pollutants from wastewater. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1987, 22, 763–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Chen, M.; Jafvert, C.T.; Wu, Y.; Cao, X.; Hankins, N.P. Inorganic anion removal using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF), modeling anion distribution and suggested improvements of MEUF: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 398, 125413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Nechifor, G.; Păncescu, F.M.; Albu, P.C.; Grosu, A.R.; Oprea, O.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Bungău, C.; Grosu, V.-A.; Ioan, M.-R.; Nechifor, A.C. Transport and Separation of the Silver Ion with n–decanol Liquid Membranes Based on 10–undecylenic Acid, 10–undecen–1–ol and Magnetic Nanoparticles. Membranes 2021, 11, 936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Burts, K.S.; Plisko, T.V.; Sjölin, M.; Rodrigues, G.; Bildyukevich, A.V.; Lipnizki, F.; Ulbricht, M. Development of Antifouling Polysulfone Membranes by Synergistic Modification with Two Different Additives in Casting Solution and Coagulation Bath: Synperonic F108 and Polyacrylic Acid. Materials 2022, 15, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Nagarale, R.K.; Gohil, G.S.; Shahi, V.K. Recent developments on ion-exchange membranes and electro-membrane processes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 119, 97–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Doornbusch, G.; van der Wal, M.; Tedesco, M.; Post, J.; Nijmeijer, K.; Borneman, Z. Multistage electrodialysis for desalination of natural seawater. Desalination 2021, 505, 114973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Tekinalp, Ö.; Zimmermann, P.; Holdcroft, S.; Burheim, O.S.; Deng, L. Cation Exchange Membranes and Process Optimizations in Electrodialysis for Selective Metal Separation: A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Cournoyer, A.; Bazinet, L. Electrodialysis Processes an Answer to Industrial Sustainability: Toward the Concept of Eco-Circular Economy? —A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Dammak, L.; Fouilloux, J.; Bdiri, M.; Larchet, C.; Renard, E.; Baklouti, L.; Sarapulova, V.; Kozmai, A.; Pismenskaya, N. A Review on Ion-Exchange Membrane Fouling during the Electrodialysis Process in the Food Industry, Part 1: Types, Effects, Characterization Methods, Fouling Mechanisms and Interactions. Membranes 2021, 11, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Solonchenko, K.; Kirichenko, A.; Kirichenko, K. Stability of Ion Exchange Membranes in Electrodialysis. Membranes 2023, 13, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Veerman, J.; Gómez-Coma, L.; Ortiz, A.; Ortiz, I. Resistance of Ion Exchange Membranes in Aqueous Mixtures of Monovalent and Divalent Ions and the Effect on Reverse Electrodialysis. Membranes 2023, 13, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Gao, W.; Fang, Q.; Yan, H.; Wei, X.; Wu, K. Recovery of Acid and Base from Sodium Sulfate Containing Lithium Carbonate Using Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis. Membranes 2021, 11, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Zhou, H.; Ju, P.; Hu, S.; Shi, L.; Yuan, W.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Shi, S. Separation of Hydrochloric Acid and Oxalic Acid from Rare Earth Oxalic Acid Precipitation Mother Liquor by Electrodialysis. Membranes 2023, 13, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Gurreri, L.; Tamburini, A.; Cipollina, A.; Micale, G. Electrodialysis Applications in Wastewater Treatment for Environmental Protection and Resources Recovery: A Systematic Review on Progress and Perspectives. Membranes 2020, 10, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Drioli, E.; Romano, M. Progress and new perspectives on integrated membrane operations for sustainable industrial growth. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 1277–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Christensen, J.J.; Lamb, J.D.; Brown, P.R.; Oscarson, J.L.; Izatt, R.M. Liquid Membrane Separations of Metal Cations Using Macrocyclic Carriers. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1981, 16, 1193–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Brown, P.R.; Izatt, R.M.; Christensenand, J.J.; Lamb, J.D. Transport of Eu2+ in a H2O-CHCl3-H2O liquid membrane system containing the macrocyclic polyether 18-crown-6. J. Membr.Sci. 1983, 13, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Burgard, M.; Elisoamiadana, P.; Leroy, M.J.F. Liquid membrane studies: Transport against the concentration gradient of AuCI. In Proceedings of the International Solvent Extraction Conference (ISEC′83), Denver, CO, USA, 26 August–2 September 1983; Volume II, pp. 399–400. [Google Scholar]
  210. Kislik, V.S.; Eyal, A.M. Hybrid liquid membrane (HLM) system in separation technologies. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 111, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Majumdar, S.; Sirkar, K.K.; Sengupta, A. Hollow-Fiber Contained Liquid Membrane. In Membrane Handbook; Ho, W.S.W., Sirkar, K.K., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Schlosser, S.; Sabol, E. Three-phase contactor with distributed U-shaped bundles of hollow-fibers for pertraction. J. Membr. Sci. 2002, 210, 331–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wodzki, R.; Nowaczyk, J. Propionic and acetic acid pertraction through a multimembrane hybrid system containing TOPO or TBP. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 26, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Nechifor, A.C.; Goran, A.; Grosu, V.-A.; Bungău, C.; Albu, P.C.; Grosu, A.R.; Oprea, O.; Păncescu, F.M.; Nechifor, G. Improving the Performance of Composite Hollow Fiber Membranes with Magnetic Field Generated Convection Application on pH Correction. Membranes 2021, 11, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Kubisova, L.; Sabolova, E.; Schlosser, S.; Martak, J.; Kertesz, R. Mass-transfer in membrane based solvent extraction and stripping of 5-methyl-2-pyrazinecarboxylic acid and co-transport of sulphuric acid in HF contactors. Desalination 2004, 163, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Nechifor, A.C.; Goran, A.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Păncescu, F.M.; Oprea, O.-C.; Grosu, A.R.; Matei, C.; Grosu, V.-A.; Vasile, B.Ș.; Albu, P.C. Obtaining and Characterizing the Osmium Nanoparticles/n–Decanol Bulk Membrane Used for the p–Nitrophenol Reduction and Separation System. Membranes 2022, 12, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Ferencz, A.; Grosu, A.R.; Al-Ani, H.N.A.; Nechifor, A.C.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Albu, P.C.; Crăciun, M.E.; Ioan, M.-R.; Grosu, V.-A.; Nechifor, G. Operational Limits of the Bulk Hybrid Liquid Membranes Based on Dispersion Systems. Membranes 2022, 12, 190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Al-Ani, F.H.; Alsalhy, Q.F.; Al-Dahhan, M.H. Enhancing Emulsion Liquid Membrane System (ELM) Stability and Performance for the Extraction of Phenol from Wastewater using Various Nanoparticles. Desalin. Water Treat. 2021, 210, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Pavón, S.; Blaesing, L.; Jahn, A.; Aubel, I.; Bertau, M. Liquid Membranes for Efficient Recovery of Phenolic Compounds Such as Vanillin and Catechol. Membranes 2021, 11, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  220. Wang, B.-Y.; Zhang, N.; Li, Z.-Y.; Lang, Q.-L.; Yan, B.-H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Selective Separation of Acetic and Hexanoic Acids across Polymer Inclusion Membrane with Ionic Liquids as Carrier. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Yang, B.; Bai, L.; Li, T.; Deng, L.; Liu, L.; Zeng, S.; Han, J.; Zhang, X. Super selective ammonia separation through multiple-site interaction with ionic liquid-based hybrid membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 628, 119264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Jean, E.; Villemin, D.; Hlaibi, M.; Lebrun, L. Heavy metal ions extraction using new supported liquid membranes containing ionic liquid as carrier. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2018, 201, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Craveiro, R.; Neves, L.A.; Duarte, A.R.C.; Paiva, A. Supported liquid membranes based on deep eutectic solvents for gas separation processes. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2021, 254, 117593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Wang, Z.Y.; Sun, Y.; Tang, N.; Miao, C.L.; Wang, Y.T.; Tang, L.H.; Wang, S.X.; Yang, X.J. Simultaneous extraction and recovery of gold(I) from alkaline solutions using an environmentally benign polymer inclusion membrane with ionic liquid as the carrier. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 222, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Bazhenov, S.D.; Bildyukevich, A.V.; Volkov, A.V. Gas-liquid hollow fiber membrane contactors for different applications. Fibers 2018, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Diaconu, I.; Nechifor, G.; Nechifor, A.C.; Ruse, E.; Totu, E.E. Membranary techniques used at the separation of some phenolic compounds from aqueous media. UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. B Chem. Mater. Sci. 2009, 71, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  227. Diaconu, I.; Gîrdea, R.; Cristea, C.; Nechifor, G.; Ruse, E.; Totu, E.E. Removal and recovery of some phenolic pollutants using liquid membranes. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2010, 15, 5702–5708. [Google Scholar]
  228. Koter, S.; Szczepański, P.; Mateescu, M.; Nechifor, G.; Badalau, L.; Koter, I. Modeling of the cadmium transport through a bulk liquid membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 107, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Szczepański, P.; Tanczos, S.K.; Ghindeanu, D.L.; Wódzki, R. Transport of p-nitrophenol in an agitated bulk liquid membrane system—Experimental and theoretical study by network analysis. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2014, 132, 616–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Craciun, M.E.; Mihai, M.; Nechifor, G. Characteristics of double jet imobilized membrane. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2009, 8, 771–776. [Google Scholar]
  231. Yoshida, W.; Baba, Y.; Kubota, F.; Kolev, S.D.; Goto, M. Selective transport of scandium(III) across polymer inclusion membranes with improved stability which contain an amic acid carrier. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 572, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Rahman, R.O.A.; Ibrahium, H.A.; Hung, Y.-T. Liquid Radioactive Wastes Treatment: A Review. Water 2011, 3, 551–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Barambu, N.U.; Bilad, M.R.; Wibisono, Y.; Jaafar, J.; Mahlia, T.M.I.; Khan, A.L. Membrane Surface Patterning as a Fouling Mitigation Strategy in Liquid Filtration: A Review. Polymers 2019, 11, 1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Karuppasamy, K.; Theerthagiri, J.; Vikraman, D.; Yim, C.-J.; Hussain, S.; Sharma, R.; Maiyalagan, T.; Qin, J.; Kim, H.-S. Ionic Liquid-Based Electrolytes for Energy Storage Devices: A Brief Review on Their Limits and Applications. Polymers 2020, 12, 918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Gonçalves, A.R.P.; Paredes, X.; Cristino, A.F.; Santos, F.J.V.; Queirós, C.S.G.P. Ionic Liquids—A Review of Their Toxicity to Living Organisms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Friess, K.; Izák, P.; Kárászová, M.; Pasichnyk, M.; Lanč, M.; Nikolaeva, D.; Luis, P.; Jansen, J.C. A Review on Ionic Liquid Gas Separation Membranes. Membranes 2021, 11, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Alashkar, A.; Al-Othman, A.; Tawalbeh, M.; Qasim, M. A Critical Review on the Use of Ionic Liquids in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. Membranes 2022, 12, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Rosli, N.A.H.; Loh, K.S.; Wong, W.Y.; Yunus, R.M.; Lee, T.K.; Ahmad, A.; Chong, S.T. Review of Chitosan-Based Polymers as Proton Exchange Membranes and Roles of Chitosan-Supported Ionic Liquids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Ribas, T.C.F.; Croft, C.F.; Almeida, M.I.G.S.; Mesquita, R.B.R.; Kolev, S.D.; Rangel, A.O.S.S. Use of a Polymer Inclusion Membrane and a Chelating Resin for the Flow-Based Sequential Determination of Copper (II) and Zinc (II) in Natural Waters and Soil Leachates. Molecules 2020, 25, 5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. Radzyminska-Lenarcik, E.; Ulewicz, M. Polymer Inclusion Membranes (PIMs) Doped with Alkylimidazole and their Application in the Separation of Non-Ferrous Metal Ions. Polymers 2019, 11, 1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Bahrami, S.; Dolatyari, L.; Shayani-Jam, H.; Yaftian, M.R.; Kolev, S.D. On the Potential of a Poly(vinylidenefluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) Polymer Inclusion Membrane Containing Aliquat® 336 and Dibutyl Phthalate for V(V) Extraction from Sulfate Solutions. Membranes 2022, 12, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Eyal, A.; Kislik, V. Aqueous hybrid liquid membrane a novel system for separation of solutes using water-soluble polymers as carriers. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 161, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Alamdar Milani, S.; Zahakifar, F.; Charkhi, A. Continuous bulk liquid membrane technique for thorium transport: Modeling and experimental validation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2018, 16, 455–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Dong, X.; Lu, D.; Harris, T.A.L.; Escobar, I.C. Polymers and Solvents Used in Membrane Fabrication: A Review Focusing on Sustainable Membrane Development. Membranes 2021, 11, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Nicoletta, F.P.; Cupelli, D.; Formoso, P.; De Filpo, G.; Colella, V.; Gugliuzza, A. Light Responsive Polymer Membranes: A Review. Membranes 2012, 2, 134–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Rybak, A.; Rybak, A.; Kolev, S.D. A Modern Computer Application to Model Rare Earth Element Ion Behavior in Adsorptive Membranes and Materials. Membranes 2023, 13, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Sabbatovskii, K.G. The effect of the adsorption of multicharge cations on the selectivity of a nanofiltration membrane. Colloid J. 2003, 65, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Kaptakov, V.O.; Milyutin, V.V.; Nekrasova, N.A.; Zelenin, P.G.; Kozlitin, E.A. Nanofiltration Extraction of Uranium and Thorium from Aqueous Solutions. Radiochemistry 2021, 63, 169–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Xu, L.; Gao, X.; Li, Z.; Gao, C. Removal of fluoride by nature diatomite from high-fluorine water: An appropriate pretreatment for nanofiltration process. Desalination 2015, 369, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Khedr, M.G. Radioactive contamination of groundwater, special aspects and advantages of removal by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 321, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Favre-Reguillon, A.; Lebuzit, G.; Foos, J.; Guy, A.; Draye, M.; Lemaire, M. Selective concentration of uranium from seawater by nanofiltration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 5900–5904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Sharma, M.; Sharma, P.; Yadav, L.; Janu, V.C.; Gupta, R. Sequestration and recovery of thorium ions using a recyclable, low-cost, glutathione-based magnetic nanocomposite: Experimental study and statistical modeling. Sep. Pur. Technol. 2023, 322, 124264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Zahakifar, F.; Keshtkar, A.R.; Talebi, M. Performance evaluation of sodium alginate/polyvinyl alcohol/polyethylene oxide/ZSM5 zeolite hybrid adsorbent for ion uptake from aqueous solutions: A case study of thorium (IV). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 327, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Hamza, M.F.; Guibal, E.; Wei, Y.; Ning, S. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of thiocarbazide-functionalized maleic-based polymer for thorium (IV) removal from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 464, 142638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Zahakifar, F.; Keshtkar, A.; Souderjani, E.Z.; Moosavian, M. Use of response surface methodology for optimization of thorium (IV) removal from aqueous solutions by electrodeionization (EDI). Prog. Nucl. Energy 2020, 124, 103335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Cheira, M.F.; Orabi, A.S.; Atia, B.M.; Hassan, S.M. Solvent extraction and separation of thorium (IV) from chloride media by a Schiff base. J. Solut. Chem. 2018, 47, 611–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Yousef, L.; Saad, M.; Afifi, S.; Ismail, A. Leaching and precipitation of thorium ions from Cataclastic rocks. Abu Rusheid Area, Southeastern Desert. Egypt Arab. J. Nucl. Sci. Appl. 2019, 51, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Fitzsimmons, J.; Abraham, A.; Catalano, D.; Younes, A.; Cutler, C.S.; Medvedev, D. Evaluation of inorganic ion exchange materials for purification of 225Ac from thorium and radium radioisotopes. J. Med. Imaging Radiat. Sci. 2019, 50, S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Xiu, T.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Wu, P.; Du, Y.; Cai, Z. Thorium adsorption on graphene oxide nanoribbons/manganese dioxide composite material. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2019, 319, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Liatsou, I.; Christodoulou, E.; Pashalidis, I. Thorium adsorption by oxidized biochar fibres derived from Luffa cylindrica sponges. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 317, 1065–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Yin, Z.; Pan, D.; Liu, P.; Wu, H.; Li, Z.; Wu, W. Sorption behavior of thorium (IV) onto activated bentonite. of thorium (IV) onto activated bentonite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 316, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Kaynar, U.H.; Şabikoğlu, İ. Adsorption of thorium (IV) by amorphous silica; response surface modelling and optimization. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 823–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Xiong, X.H.; Yuan, Y.H.; Huang, B.; He, M.; Chen, H.; Luo, Y.C.; Zhu, Y.A.; Luo, T.A.; Chen, Q.S. Th (IV) adsorption onto titanium tetrachloride modified sodium bentonite. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2019, 319, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Talebi, M.; Abbasizadeh, S.; Keshtkar, A.R. Evaluation of single and simultaneous thorium and uranium sorption from water systems by an electrospun PVA/SA/PEO/HZSM5 nanofiber. Process. Saf. Environ. Prot. 2017, 109, 340–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Wang, Y.; Chen, X.; Hu, X.; Wu, P.; Lan, T.; Li, Y.; Tu, H.; Liu, Y.; Yuan, D.; Wu, Z.; et al. Synthesis and characterization of poly (TRIM/VPA) functionalized graphene oxide nanoribbons aerogel for highly efficient capture of thorium (IV) from aqueous solutions. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 536, 147829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Zhang, H.; Yang, F.; Bai, R.; Zhao, Z.; Cai, C.; Li, J.; Ma, Y. Facile preparation of Ce enhanced vinyl-functionalized silica aerogel-like monoliths for selective separation of radioactive thorium from monazite. Mater. Des. 2020, 186, 108333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Sharma, M.; Laddha, H.; Yadav, P.; Jain, Y.; Sachdev, K.; Janu, V.C.; Gupta, R. Selective removal of uranium from an aqueous solution of mixed radionuclides of uranium, cesium, and strontium via a viable recyclable GO@chitosan based magnetic nanocomposite. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 32, 104020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Alamdarlo, F.V.; Solookinejad, G.; Zahakifar, F.; Jalal, M.R.; Jabbari, M. Study of kinetic, thermodynamic, and isotherm of Sr adsorption from aqueous solutions on graphene oxide (GO) and (aminomethyl) phosphonic acid–graphene oxide (AMPA–GO). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021, 329, 1033–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Zahakifar, F.; Charkhi, A.; Torab-Mostaedi, M.; Davarkhah, R. Kinetic study of uranium transport via a bulk liquid membrane containing Alamine 336 as a carrier. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 316, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Nechifor, G.; Grosu, A.R.; Ferencz, A.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Goran, A.; Grosu, V.-A.; Bungău, S.G.; Păncescu, F.M.; Albu, P.C.; Nechifor, A.C. Simultaneous Release of Silver Ions and 10–Undecenoic Acid from Silver Iron–Oxide Nanoparticles Impregnated Membranes. Membranes 2022, 12, 557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Karimi, M.; Milani, S.A.; Abolgashemi, H. Kinetic and isotherm analyses for thorium (IV) adsorptive removal from aqueous solutions by modified magnetite nanoparticle using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Nucl. Mater. 2016, 479, 174–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Agrawal, Y.K.; Vora, S.B. Selective extraction and separation of thorium from monazite using N-phenylbenzo-18-crown-6-hydroxamic acid. Microchim. Acta 2003, 142, 255–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Alharbi, H.F.; Haddad, M.Y.; Aijaz, M.O.; Assaifan, A.K.; Karim, M.R. Electrospun Bilayer PAN/Chitosan Nanofiber Membranes Incorporated with Metal Oxide Nanoparticles for Heavy Metal Ion Adsorption. Coatings 2020, 10, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Goh, P.S.; Samavati, Z.; Ismail, A.F.; Ng, B.C.; Abdullah, M.S.; Hilal, N. Modification of Liquid Separation Membranes Using Multidimensional Nanomaterials: Revealing the Roles of Dimension Based on Classical Titanium Dioxide. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Jakubski, Ł.; Dudek, G.; Turczyn, R. Applicability of Composite Magnetic Membranes in Separation Processes of Gaseous and Liquid Mixtures—A Review. Membranes 2023, 13, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Wu, W.; Shi, Y.; Liu, G.; Fan, X.; Yu, Y. Recent development of graphene oxide based forward osmosis membrane for water treatment: A critical review. Desalination 2020, 491, 114452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Worku, L.A.; Bachheti, A.; Bachheti, R.K.; Rodrigues Reis, C.E.; Chandel, A.K. Agricultural Residues as Raw Materials for Pulp and Paper Production: Overview and Applications on Membrane Fabrication. Membranes 2023, 13, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Charcosset, C. Classical and Recent Developments of Membrane Processes for Desalination and Natural Water Treatment. Membranes 2022, 12, 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Shahid, M.K.; Mainali, B.; Rout, P.R.; Lim, J.W.; Aslam, M.; Al-Rawajfeh, A.E.; Choi, Y. A Review of Membrane-Based Desalination Systems Powered by Renewable Energy Sources. Water 2023, 15, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Qasim, M.; Badrelzaman, M.; Darwish, N.N.; Darwish, N.A.; Hilal, N. Reverse osmosis desalination: A state-of-the-art review. Desalination 2019, 459, 59–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Bundschuh, J.; Kaczmarczyk, M.; Ghaffour, N.; Tomaszewska, B. State-of-the-art of renewable energy sources used in water desalination: Present and future prospects. Desalination 2021, 508, 115035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Awad, A.M.; Jalab, R.; Minier-Matar, J.; Adham, S.; Nasser, M.S.; Judd, S.J. The status of forward osmosis technology implementation. Desalination 2019, 461, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Skuse, C.; Gallego-Schmid, A.; Azapagic, A.; Gorgojo, P. Can emerging membrane-based desalination technologies replace reverse osmosis? Desalination 2021, 500, 114844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Zhao, S.; Liao, Z.; Fane, A.; Li, J.; Tang, C.; Zheng, C.; Lin, J.; Kong, L. Engineering antifouling reverse osmosis membranes: A review. Desalination 2021, 499, 114857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Santoro, S.; Timpano, P.; Avci, A.H.; Argurio, P.; Chidichimo, F.; De Biase, M.; Straface, S.; Curcio, E. An integrated membrane distillation, photocatalysis and polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration process for arsenic remediation at point-of-use. Desalination 2021, 520, 115378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Moon, H.-C. Equilibrium ultrafiltration of hydrolyzed thorium (IV) solutions. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1989, 10, 270–272. [Google Scholar]
  287. Nilchi, A.; Dehaghan, T.S.; Garmarodi, S.R. Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamics for uranium and thorium ions adsorption from aqueous solutions by crystalline tin oxide nanoparticles. Desalination 2013, 321, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Abbasizadeh, S.; Keshtkar, A.R.; Mousavian, M.A. Preparation of a novel electrospun polyvinyl alcohol/titanium oxide nanofiber adsorbent modified with mercapto groups for uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) removal from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 220, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Tsezos, M.; Volesky, B. Biosorption of uranium and thorium. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1981, 23, 583–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Hritcu, D.; Humelnicu, D.; Dodi, G.; Popa, M.I. Magnetic chitosan composite particles: Evaluation of thorium and uranyl ion adsorption from aqueous solutions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 87, 1185–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Zolfonoun, E.; Yousefi, S.R. Sorption and preconcentration of uranium and thorium from aqueous solutions using multi-walled carbon nanotubes decorated with magnetic nanoparticles. Radiochim. Acta 2015, 103, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. García, A.C.; Latifi, M.; Amini, A.; Chaouki, J. Separation of Radioactive Elements from Rare Earth Element-Bearing Minerals. Metals 2020, 10, 1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Bejanidze, I.; Petrov, O.; Kharebava, T.; Pohrebennyk, V.; Davitadze, N.; Didmanidze, N. Study of the Healing Properties of Natural Sources of Georgia and Modeling of Their Purification Processes. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Domestic applications of thorium and thorium dioxide, along with the alleged use in generating energy in nuclear power plants (U–Th cycle).
Figure 1. Domestic applications of thorium and thorium dioxide, along with the alleged use in generating energy in nuclear power plants (U–Th cycle).
Membranes 13 00765 g001
Figure 2. Simplified flowcharts for obtaining thorium from monazite: (a) acid digestion; (b) alkaline fusion.
Figure 2. Simplified flowcharts for obtaining thorium from monazite: (a) acid digestion; (b) alkaline fusion.
Membranes 13 00765 g002aMembranes 13 00765 g002b
Figure 3. Hypothetical stability diagram of thorium hydroxo-complexes in aqueous medium.
Figure 3. Hypothetical stability diagram of thorium hydroxo-complexes in aqueous medium.
Membranes 13 00765 g003
Figure 4. Common organic reagents involved in thorium ion complexation and/or extraction. The colored groups (in red) interact with the thorium ion (in yellow).
Figure 4. Common organic reagents involved in thorium ion complexation and/or extraction. The colored groups (in red) interact with the thorium ion (in yellow).
Membranes 13 00765 g004
Figure 5. Multicomponent system bordered by a selective window, including ions, small molecules, macromolecules, nanoparticles, microparticles, microorganisms and viruses as suspended particles: (a) system in equilibrium; (b) system subject to an electrochemical potential difference (Δµ). The meaning of shapes and symbols in Figure 5 is as follows.
Figure 5. Multicomponent system bordered by a selective window, including ions, small molecules, macromolecules, nanoparticles, microparticles, microorganisms and viruses as suspended particles: (a) system in equilibrium; (b) system subject to an electrochemical potential difference (Δµ). The meaning of shapes and symbols in Figure 5 is as follows.
Membranes 13 00765 g005
Figure 6. Membrane separation processes under pressure difference: (a) obtaining drinking water through reverse osmosis; (b) piston type (dead-end filtration); (c) tangential flow; (d) tangential flow through large sections; (e) flow through tubes.
Figure 6. Membrane separation processes under pressure difference: (a) obtaining drinking water through reverse osmosis; (b) piston type (dead-end filtration); (c) tangential flow; (d) tangential flow through large sections; (e) flow through tubes.
Membranes 13 00765 g006
Figure 7. Advanced hollow-fiber filtration module.
Figure 7. Advanced hollow-fiber filtration module.
Membranes 13 00765 g007
Figure 8. Common types of carriers: macrocyclic compounds, modified classical complexant agents and nano-species [194].
Figure 8. Common types of carriers: macrocyclic compounds, modified classical complexant agents and nano-species [194].
Membranes 13 00765 g008
Figure 9. Scheme of an electrolysis cell for the concentration of a salt by electrodialysis with two ion exchange membranes.
Figure 9. Scheme of an electrolysis cell for the concentration of a salt by electrodialysis with two ion exchange membranes.
Membranes 13 00765 g009
Figure 10. Schematic presentation of membrane systems with an organic solvent: denser (a) or less dense (b) than aqueous phases. Legend: M = membranes; SP = source phase; RP = receiving phase; A = chemical species of interest for separation [214].
Figure 10. Schematic presentation of membrane systems with an organic solvent: denser (a) or less dense (b) than aqueous phases. Legend: M = membranes; SP = source phase; RP = receiving phase; A = chemical species of interest for separation [214].
Membranes 13 00765 g010
Figure 11. Schematic presentation of extraction and membrane systems with organic solvent: (a) water 1 (W1)–organic solvent (OS)–water extraction (W2); (b) liquid membranes (LMs); (c) bulk liquid membranes (BLMs); (d) supported liquid membranes (SLMs); (e) emulsion liquid membranes (ELMs). Legend: M = Membrane; SP = Source Phase; RP = Receiving Phase [214,216].
Figure 11. Schematic presentation of extraction and membrane systems with organic solvent: (a) water 1 (W1)–organic solvent (OS)–water extraction (W2); (b) liquid membranes (LMs); (c) bulk liquid membranes (BLMs); (d) supported liquid membranes (SLMs); (e) emulsion liquid membranes (ELMs). Legend: M = Membrane; SP = Source Phase; RP = Receiving Phase [214,216].
Membranes 13 00765 g011
Figure 12. Schematic presentation of the permeation module with dispersed phases: (a) front view; (b) cross-section detail. Legend: SP—source phase; RP—receiving phase; M—organic solvent membrane; mnp—magnetic nanoparticles; str—stirrer with magnetic rods [216,217].
Figure 12. Schematic presentation of the permeation module with dispersed phases: (a) front view; (b) cross-section detail. Legend: SP—source phase; RP—receiving phase; M—organic solvent membrane; mnp—magnetic nanoparticles; str—stirrer with magnetic rods [216,217].
Membranes 13 00765 g012
Figure 13. Schematic presentation of the transport mechanism by liquid membranes (C—carrier, X—anion complexant): (a) physical “simple” shipping; (b) transport with carrier; (c) coupled transport; (d) counter-transport.
Figure 13. Schematic presentation of the transport mechanism by liquid membranes (C—carrier, X—anion complexant): (a) physical “simple” shipping; (b) transport with carrier; (c) coupled transport; (d) counter-transport.
Membranes 13 00765 g013
Figure 14. Scheme of proposals for the separation, recovery and recycling of thorium from waste of municipal waste management platforms: (a) valorization of thorium from unsorted waste; (b) recovery of thorium from electrodes and light bulb filaments; (c) valorization of thorium from magnesium or aluminum alloys.
Figure 14. Scheme of proposals for the separation, recovery and recycling of thorium from waste of municipal waste management platforms: (a) valorization of thorium from unsorted waste; (b) recovery of thorium from electrodes and light bulb filaments; (c) valorization of thorium from magnesium or aluminum alloys.
Membranes 13 00765 g014aMembranes 13 00765 g014b
Table 1. The number of publications highlighted in Google Scholar on various keywords related to thorium.
Table 1. The number of publications highlighted in Google Scholar on various keywords related to thorium.
Keywords *Scholar Google Publication Number
in Different Periods
SCOPUS Publication Number
Any Time2014–20232021–20231995–2023
Thorium separation162,00082,00012,9002186
Thorium concentration199,00012,20062007888
Thorium recovery79,00017,9009200896
Thorium removal62,00017,50013,800132
Membrane thorium separation21,90010,6003730458
Membrane thorium concentration27,60019,0004610141
Membrane thorium recovery18,0008600385027
Membrane thorium removal21,60012,00045005
“Thorium separation”8832447925
“Thorium recovery”6112048734
“Thorium recycling”501842
“Thorium membrane”722
* accessed on 24 June 24 2023.
Table 3. Concentration and separation of thorium using various techniques and selective materials.
Table 3. Concentration and separation of thorium using various techniques and selective materials.
Processes/Methods/
Techniques
Materials Characteristics Refs.
Thorium removal Different adsorbentsActivated carbons and zeolites (natural and synthetic)[140]
Removal of thorium (IV) from aqueous Solutions Modification of clinoptilolite as a robust adsorbentHighly efficient thorium removal material[141]
Preconcentration of uranium in natural water samples New polymer with imprinted ionsDetermination by digital imaging[142]
Adsorption of trace thorium (IV) from aqueous solution Mono-modified β-cyclodextrin polyrotaxaneUsing response surface methodology (RSM)[143]
Preconcentration and separation of actinidesNovel malonamide-grafted polystyrene-divinyl benzene resinFor hexavalent and tetravalent actinides such as U (VI), Th (IV) and Pu(IV)[144]
Comparative adsorption Mesoporous Al2O3Selectivity of Th (IV) compared U (VI), La (III), Ce (III), Sm (III) and Gd (III) [145]
Extraction and precipitation agents α-aminophosphonates, -phosphinates, and -phosphine oxidesFor rare earth metals, thorium, and uranium[146]
Removal of polyvalent metal ions Polyurea-crosslinked alginate aerogelsEu (III) and Th (IV) from aqueous solutions[147]
Method for separating thoriumPatented Chinese methodSeparating cerium-fluoride and thorium[148]
Extraction and recovery of cerium (IV) and thorium (IV) α-aminophosphonate extractantExtraction and recovery of Ce (IV) and Th (IV) from sulphate medium[149]
Selective extraction and separation Sulfate medium using Di(2-ethylhexyl)-N-heptylaminomethylphosphonateCe (IV) and Th (IV) from RE (III)[150]
α-aminophosphonate extractantCe (IV) from thorium and trivalent rare earths[151]
α-aminophosphonic acid HEHAPPHeavy rare earths from chloride medium[152]
α-aminophosphonic acid extractant HEHAMPRare earths from chloride media [153]
Study of thorium adsorptionPAN/zeolite composite adsorbentAdsorption model[154]
Tulul Al-Shabba Zeolitic Tuff, JordanAdsorption of Th (IV) and U (VI)[155]
Sodium clinoptiloliteRemoval of Th from aqueous solutions[156]
Modification of zeoliteUsing tandem acid-base treatments[157]
Selective cloud point extraction of thorium (IV)Tetraazonium-based ionic liquidThorium extraction isotherm[158]
Removal of thorium (IV) from aqueous solutions Deoiled karanja seed cakeOptimization using Taguchi method[159]
Retention of uranyl and thorium ions from radioactive solution Peat mossRetention of uranyl and Th ions from radioactive solution[160]
Photocatalysis and adsorptionPhoto-responsive metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)Design strategies and emerging applications[161]
Electrochemical and electrolytic separationTh (IV) and Ce (III) in ThF4CeF3-LiCl-KCl quaternary meltSeparation of Th (IV) and Ce (III)[162]
Selective removalHybrid mesoporous adsorbent as benzenesulfonamide-derivative@ZrO2Thorium ions from aqueous solutions[163]
Extraction Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate/polyvinyl chlorideRare earth group separation from lamprophyre dyke leachate[164]
Fluorescent sensors Metal-organic framework (MOF)Hazardous material detection[165]
Zeolite adsorptionSeparation of radionuclidesFrom a REE-containing solution[166]
Equilibrium studyAcidic (chelating) and organophosphorus ligandsEquilibrium constants of mixed complexes of REE[167]
Molecule for solvent extraction of metalsThenoyltrifluoroacetoneThorium extraction[168]
Chemical adsorption8-Hydroxyquinoline immobilized bentoniteRemoval of U and Th from their aqueous solutions[169]
Table 4. Characteristics of pressure gradient processes.
Table 4. Characteristics of pressure gradient processes.
Type of Membrane ProcessPore Diameter
(nm)
Pressure
(Bar)
Obtained Water Content
Reverse osmosis<0.625–60Pure water
(poorly ionized)
Nanofiltration0.5–106–30Pure water
(traces of molecular substances)
Ultrafiltration7–2004–15Pure water, molecular substances and macromolecules
Microfiltration150–50000.1–2.5Pure water, molecular substances and colloids
Table 5. Possible losses of thorium in the environment and remedial possibilities.
Table 5. Possible losses of thorium in the environment and remedial possibilities.
Technological OperationLosses of Thorium or of Thorium-Contaminated MaterialsMeans of Remediation or Reduction of Losses
Crushing, grindingDust removal
Mill shutdown losses
Losses when cleaning the machine
Microfilter installation
Micro- and ultrafiltration of colloidal washing solutions
Solubilization or leachingIncomplete solubilization with the chosen reagent
Complete solubilization
Insufficient concentration of thorium
Solubilization with a complementary reagent
Selective reprecipitation and solubilization
Concentration by precipitation and microfiltration
FiltrationThorium retention in the precipitate
Reduced concentration of thorium in the filtrate
Washing with solubilizing reagents
Reprecipitation and micro- or ultrafiltration
PrecipitationIncomplete precipitation
Precipitation of nanometric particles
Nanofiltration or reverse osmosis of the filtrate
Colloidal ultrafiltration or nanofiltration
ExtractionSolvent losses
Incomplete extraction
Solvent recovery
Use of selective extractants
Ion exchangeBlockage of thorium in the ion exchanger (elution inefficiency)
Incomplete retention
Change eluent
Recovery of ion exchangers for destruction (burning)
Table 6. Aspects regarding the use of membrane techniques and membrane materials, with possible implications regarding thorium separation.
Table 6. Aspects regarding the use of membrane techniques and membrane materials, with possible implications regarding thorium separation.
Membrane TechniquesMaterials and ApplicationsCharacteristicsRefs.
Waste TreatmentLiquid radioactive waste treatment [232]
Liquid FiltrationMembrane surface patterning as a fouling mitigationStrategy for Processes[233]
Ionic LiquidGas separation membranes [234]
Proton exchange membrane in fuel cells [235]
Chitosan-based polymers as proton exchangeRoles of Chitosan-Supported Polymers[236]
Based electrolytes for energy storage devices [237]
Toxicity to living organisms [238]
Polymer Inclusion Membranes (PIMs) Sequential determination of Copper (II) and Zinc (II) in natural waters and soil leachatesChelating Resin[239]
Application in the separation of non-ferrous metal ionsMembranes (PIMs) Doped with Alkylimidazole[240]
Poly(vinylidene-fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) extraction from sulfate solutionsContaining Aliquat® 336 and Dibutyl Phthalate[241]
Bulk Hybrid Liquid Membranes Operational limitsBased on Dispersion Systems[217,242]
Thorium transport: modeling and experimental validationContinuous Bulk Liquid Membrane Technique[243]
Membrane Fabrication Sustainable membrane developmentPolymers and Solvents Used[244]
Light-Responsive Polymer Membranes Miscellaneous applicationReport Recent Progress In The Research Field[245]
Adsorptive Membranes and MaterialsModern computer applicationsModel for Rare Earth Element Ions[246]
NanofiltrationEffect of the adsorption of multicharge cations on the selectivity NF and Adsorption[247]
Extraction of uranium and thorium from aqueous solutionsNF and Extraction[248]
Removal of fluorideBy Nature, Diatomite From High-Fluorine Water[249]
Removal of radioactive contamination of groundwater, special aspects and advantagesIncluding RO[250]
U from seawater by nanofiltrationSelective Concentration[251]
Glutathione-Based Magnetic NanocompositeSequestration and recovery of Th ions Using Recyclable, Low-Cost Materials[252]
Zeolite Hybrid AdsorbentCase study of thorium (IV)Evaluation of Sodium Alginate/Polyvinyl Alcohol/Polyethylene Oxide/ZSM5 Zeolite Hybrid Adsorbent[253]
Functionalized Maleic-Based Polymer Thorium (IV) removal from aqueous solutionsSynthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Thiocarbazide Functionalization[254]
Electro-deionization (EDI)Th removal from aqueous solutions by electro-deionization (EDI)Use of Response Surface Methodology for Optimization of Thorium (IV)[255]
Table 7. Recent materials and processes for thorium recovery.
Table 7. Recent materials and processes for thorium recovery.
ProcessesApplicationsCharacteristicsRefs.
Solvent extraction and separation of thorium (IV) Separation of thoriumFrom chloride media by a Schiff base[256]
Leaching and precipitation of thorium ions Th separation from Cataclastic rocks Abu Rusheid Area, South Eastern Desert, Egypt[257]
Ion exchange materialsProcess for purification of 225Ac from thorium and radium radioisotopesEvaluation of inorganic ion exchange materials[258]
AdsorptionThorium adsorption Graphene oxide nanoribbons/manganese dioxide composite material[259]
Thorium adsorptionOxidized biochar fibers derived from Luffa
cylindrica sponges
[260]
Sorption behavior of thorium (IV)Activated bentonite[261]
Adsorption of thorium (IV) response surface modelling and optimizationAmorphous silica[262]
Th (IV) adsorptionTitanium tetrachloride-modified sodium bentonite[263]
Evaluation of single and simultaneous thorium and uranium sorption from water systemsElectrospun PVA/SA/PEO/HZSM5 nanofiber[264]
Synthesis and characterization of poly(TRIM/VPA)-functionalized graphene oxide nanoribbon aerogel Highly efficient capture of thorium (IV) Th ions separation from aqueous solutions[265]
Vinyl-functionalized silica aerogel-like monolithsSelective separation of radioactive thorium Thorium separation from monazite[266]
Recyclable GO@chitosan-based magnetic nanocompositeSelective removal of uranium From an aqueous solution of mixed radionuclides of uranium, cesium and strontium [267]
Study of kinetics, thermodynamics, and isotherms of Sr adsorptionGraphene oxide (GO) and (aminomethyl) phosphonic acid–graphene oxide (AMPA–GO)Th ion separation[268]
Bulk liquid membrane containing Alamine 336 as a carrierKinetic study of uranium transportSelectivity of the transport[269]
Continuous bulk liquid membrane technique Thorium transportModeling and experimental validation[270]
Kinetic and isotherm analyses using response surface methodology (RSM)Thorium (IV) adsorptive removal from aqueous solutions By modified magnetite nanoparticles[271]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Man, G.T.; Albu, P.C.; Nechifor, A.C.; Grosu, A.R.; Tanczos, S.-K.; Grosu, V.-A.; Ioan, M.-R.; Nechifor, G. Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining. Membranes 2023, 13, 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090765

AMA Style

Man GT, Albu PC, Nechifor AC, Grosu AR, Tanczos S-K, Grosu V-A, Ioan M-R, Nechifor G. Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining. Membranes. 2023; 13(9):765. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090765

Chicago/Turabian Style

Man, Geani Teodor, Paul Constantin Albu, Aurelia Cristina Nechifor, Alexandra Raluca Grosu, Szidonia-Katalin Tanczos, Vlad-Alexandru Grosu, Mihail-Răzvan Ioan, and Gheorghe Nechifor. 2023. "Thorium Removal, Recovery and Recycling: A Membrane Challenge for Urban Mining" Membranes 13, no. 9: 765. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes13090765

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop