Next Article in Journal
Essential Fatty Acid Associated with Heart Rate Variability in Highly Trained Male Cross-Country Skiers: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Modeling and Interpretability of Deep Neural Sleep Staging: A Systematic Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Physiologia
Volume 4
Issue 1
10.3390/physiologia4010002
physiologia-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Response of Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.) cv. Kalinioti to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application

by
Dimitris Kotsias
1,
Victor Kavvadias
2,* and
Christos Pappas
3
1
Direction of Agricultural Development, Region of Attiki, 15 Halkokondili Str., 10432 Athens, Greece
2
Department of Soil Science of Athens, Institute of Soil and Water Resources, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, 1 Sofokli Venizelou Str., Likovrisi, 14123 Athens, Greece
3
Directorate of Development and Applications, Hellenic Agricultural Organization DIMITRA, Kourtidou 56-58 & Nirvana, 11145 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Physiologia 2024, 4(1), 43-53; https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia4010002
Submission received: 27 October 2023 / Revised: 13 December 2023 / Accepted: 27 December 2023 / Published: 31 December 2023
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nitrogen is the most commonly managed mineral nutrient in olive groves because it is essential for plant growth. The precise management of N fertilization in olive cultivation is still not fully clarified, but it is essential for providing sustainable production. A nitrogen fertilizer experiment with olive trees (cv. Kalinioti) was carried out over a six-year period. Seven levels of nitrogen fertilizer given as ammonium nitrate (control, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kg/tree) were annually applied in order to determine the effect of nitrogen on vegetative growth, fruit set, fruit weight, yield, maturation index, and leaf N, P, and K concentrations. The results indicate that, under these conditions, application of up to 4 kg NH4NO3/tree significantly increased yield to 62.5 kg/tree compared to the control (37.09 kg/tree). The positive effect was attributed to the initial and final fruit set increases (7.63 and 3.73%, respectively at 4 kg NH4NO3/tree). However, the weight of 100 olives (W100 = 331 g) at 4 kg NH4NO3/tree obtained during harvest was considerably lower compared to the control (W100 = 384 g). Higher nitrogen rates decreased yield while increasing overall shoot growth. Nitrogen fertilization did not significantly influence the oil content of olive fruit. Fruit weight, maturation index, and concentration of oil reached maximum levels in the beginning of December, indicating a suitable start to olive harvesting. The concentration of N in olive leaves increased from 1.23% to 2.38% as fertilizer levels increased from 0 to 6 kg NH4NO3. Maximum yield was achieved at a level of 6 kg NH4NO3/tree, which corresponded to 2.01% N in leaves. The results suggest that application of 3 kg NH4NO3/tree can be recommended for table olive production, due to the fact that fruit weight was not decreased, while fertilization with 4 kg NH4NO3/tree was suitable for oil olives.

1. Introduction

Application of nitrogen is the main aspect of olive orchard (Olea europaea L.) fertilization due to its significant influence on plant growth as a key nutritional component [1,2]. Many studies have documented the key role of N fertilization on improving olive production [3,4,5]. These studies have consistently reported a gradual increase in productivity as a result of nitrogen applications.
There is some disagreement on the importance of applying nitrogen once a year to increase olive production when it comes to fertilization management, since N is often given in too large of amounts [1,6,7]. According to Fernández-Escobar et al. [8], a major problem arises in olive orchards due to excessive nitrogen fertilization, leading to various adverse effects on both the trees and the soil. Furthermore, excessive use of fertilizer faces significant costs and results in the loss of nitrogen through leaching, which has detrimental effects on the ecosystem [9]. The optimal management of nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards, including fertilizer dose and timing of distribution, remains poorly understood [6,10,11]. However, it is of paramount significance to develop management strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental consequences of nitrogen losses and minimizing the adverse impacts of excessive nitrogen on tree health.
Many works on olive nutrition have pointed out that nitrogen fertilization (a) promotes olive yield [3,4,5]; (b) reduces the phenomenon of alternate bearing [5]; (c) increases fruit set [12]; (d) increases shoot length and the number of inflorescences, and regulates the growth of female bodies of olive flowers [13]. Most of these studies have used between 0.5 and 1.3 kg N/tree in their experiments, while the application of excessive amounts of nitrogen had adverse effects on yield, fruit weight, fruit set, oil content, and oil quality [5,12,13,14,15]. Conversely, a lack of nitrogen in olive tree orchards leads to significant decreases in productivity [16]. Haberman [5] noted that when the concentration of nitrogen in the leaves of trees fell below 1.3%, there was a significant decrease in production. Low nitrogen availability led to decreased vegetative growth, flowering, fruit set, and ultimately fruit production. Additionally, the trees seemed to be more prone to alternate bearing. Furthermore, it has been observed that both excessive and insufficient amounts of nitrogen have a considerable negative impact on oil productivity [12].
Nitrogen fertilization is usually applied to the soil at 0.5–1.5 kg per olive tree at the end of winter, using urea, ammonium sulphate, or ammonium nitrate, mainly depending on soil properties [17,18]. Despite the economic importance of olive tree cultivation in the Mediterranean region, there is not enough information regarding olive nutrient requirements, mainly nitrogen [19]. Fernández-Escobar et al. [20] concluded that the application of fertilizers does not have a significant impact on crop yield, fruit weight, oil content, or vegetative growth after a period of five years. Ferreira et al. [21] argue that previous studies on nitrogen fertilization in olive groves, while important, lack conclusive guidance for fertilizer recommendation systems. Consequently, this topic holds scientific interest and carries substantial practical significance within the field of olive grove fertilization.
The olive tree holds an important position in the Albanian economy as one of the main fruit trees. The olive cultivar “Kalinioti” is the dominant variety in Albania, covering more than 55% of the total olive tree area [22]. This is attributed to its remarkable adaptability to a range of environmental conditions and its high oil content. The lack of data regarding nitrogen fertilization of the olive variety “Kalinioti”, in conjunction with the fact that olive fertilization is usually based on visual practices, has resulted in the thoughtless and excessive use of nitrogenous fertilizers that many times adversely affect productivity, fruit quality, olive oil production, and groundwater quality [23,24,25]. Moreover, basal fertilization with K and P has become an established and necessary cultivation practice in olive orchards in the region of South Albania, aiming at a balanced fertilization of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P2O5), and potassium (K2O). Potassium is considered important for fruit production [26,27]. In addition, due to the fact that phosphorus fertilizers are rapidly fixed to the soil, particularly one rich in CaCO3, a large proportion of applied P may become chemically bound, whereas only a small fraction of soil P remains in the soil solution and is available for plant uptake [28,29], restricting reproductive growth and yields [28]. Therefore, olive leaf nutrient content (N, P, and K) is a valuable tool to determine the NPK status of olive trees. The aim of this work was to study the effect of nitrogen fertilization on the vegetative growth, yield, fruit set, fruit weight, and fruit oil concentration of the olive cultivar “Kalinioti” and its leaf nutrient (N, P, K) content. This study was based on 6-year field trials in commercial orchards of mature trees where intensive olive cultivation was being practiced.

2. Results

A significant and positive impact of N fertilizer doses on shoot length was recorded (Table 1). Tree crown volume showed the same tendency with the amount of N applied. At the highest level of N, trees showed excessive vegetative growth with many water shoots. Nitrogen fertilization positively affected olive yield compared to control. The increase was significant with the application of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree (~265 kg ha−1), where yield reached 62.5 kg/tree compared to 37.1 kg/tree of the control. Further increases in N rates significantly reduced yield while increasing the number of water shoots.
As regards fruit set, a significant increase in the initial fruit set was recorded due to the application of 3 and 4 kg NH4NO3/tree compared to the control (Table 2). Application of 4 kg fertilizer/tree gave the highest initial and final fruit sets (7.63% and 3.03% respectively) among treatments. A further increase in N fertilizer (5 kg NH4NO3/tree and 6 kg NH4NO3/tree) reduced fruit sets.
Fresh weight of 100 olives, oil content, and maturation index increased with time, reaching maximum levels at 5–10 December (Table 3). Although the trees that received 4 kg NH4NO3 had the maximum yield, the weight of 100 olives (W100) in these trees was much lower compared to the other treatments. The application of nitrogenous fertilizer had no effect on oil content, but higher fertilizer applications (5 and 6 kg NH4NO3/tree) in December significantly reduced the maturation index.
With increasing N doses, leaf N concentration increased, reaching 2.38% at the level of 6 kg NO3NH4/tree (Table 4). Maximum yield (62.5 kg/tree at the dose of 4 kg/tree) corresponded to 2.01% N in leaves. Control trees and trees receiving 1 kg NO3NH4 had leaf N concentrations (1.23–1.34%, d.w.) well below the optimum levels (1.5–2.3%) [30,31] and close to the deficient threshold range (1.2–1.4%) [20,32,33,34]. High levels of fertilizers (5–6 kg NH4NO3/tree) reduced P and K concentrations in leaves compared to control; however, the decrease was significant only for K. Leaf P and K concentrations were within the optimal range (0.09–0.3% for P and 0.70–1.0% for K) [31,34,35], with the exception of the concentration of K in the leaves of trees receiving N dosages (5–6 kg NH4NO3/tree) (0.4%, d.w.), where values were far below the optimum range.

3. Discussion

Excess nitrogenous fertilization significantly enhanced vegetative growth. The canopy volume of trees receiving 5 and 6 NH4NO3/tree was significantly higher compared to that of trees treated with lower N rates; however, overfertilization did not enhance yield. Indeed, further increases in N rates (>4 kg fertilizer or above 265 kg N/tree) reduced yield and increased the number of water shoots since an abundant supply of nitrogen, sufficient water, high air humidity, and moderate temperatures stimulate vegetative growth [36]. Similarly, Haberman et al. [5] reported that the highest N level was the most effective in promoting vegetative growth but did not induce an increase in yield, whereas low nitrogen fertilization has negative effects on both vegetative growth and the production of olive fruit and oil content. These effects were attributed to a decrease in the intensity of flowering and a reduction in the rate of perfect flowers and fruit set. Concentration of N can be correctly detected through a leaf analysis, which is the best diagnosis method to determine the nutrient status and plan fertilizer recommendations [37]. In our study, leaf N concentrations of 2.29–2.38% in trees treated with 5–6 kg of NH4NO3 were associated with reduced yields. However, even control trees showed leaf P and K concentrations within the optimum range, which is probably due to the fact that basic soil analysis showed an excessive concentration of P (120 mg kg−1) and an adequate level of available K (0.45 meq/100 g).The relatively higher yields achieved at 3 and 4 kg of fertilizer per tree (about 204 and 265 kg N ha−1 respectively) in this study seem to be necessary for a satisfactory production. Under these N doses, the concentration in leaves ranged from 1.89–2.01% d.w., within optimum levels for olive trees. These N doses are higher compared to nitrogen doses (40–140 kg N ha−1), which are characterized as the best for both yield [38,39], and guarantee the quality and stability of the olive oil. In fact, annual applications of 80–200 kg N ha−1 and more are common in many areas of the Mediterranean basin [1]. Variations in soil climatic conditions, different cultivars, phenological stages, cultivation areas, etc. are the causes of the different responses of olive orchards to various N fertilization rates [40,41].
Olive trees in southern Spain’s arid regions were fertilized annually with varying quantities of nitrogen. Fernández-Escobar and Marín [17] and Fernández-Escobar et al. [32] concluded that after three and six years of experimentation, respectively, increasing the amount of N applied from 0 to 1 kg of N per olive tree (about 2.86 kg NH4NO3/tree) did not result in an increase in yield, fruit size, oil content, or vegetative growth. Fernández-Escobar and Marín [17] suggested that there is no need for annual application of nitrogen fertilizer in olive orchards in order to achieve satisfactory productivity and growth, as long as the leaf nitrogen levels remain above the sufficiency threshold. Ângelo Rodrigues et al. [42] recommend adjustments to the rates of N every year to prevent reductions in tree crop performance and improve nutrient-use efficiency.
With regards to oil content, our results showed that nitrogen fertilization did not significantly affect it. This may be attributed to the fact that soil nitrogen content levels under control conditions are characterized as medium in total N (1.47 mg/g), and therefore nitrogen enrichment might only affect oil production under conditions of low nitrogen availability. Fernández-Escobar et al. [32] also reported similar findings, where increasing the amount of nitrogen applied from 0 to 1 kg of N per olive tree did not result in an increase in oil content. In addition, Fernández-Escobar and Marin [17] observed lower oil content in trees with leaf nitrogen concentrations below the deficient threshold of 1.4%, suggesting a delay in lipogenesis. In our study, leaf nitrogen concentration under control treatment was below the deficient threshold, but oil content remained unaffected by increasing N doses. In contrast, other authors have shown that nitrogen fertilization has positive effects on oil content [43]. Erel et al. [44] highlighted the significance of balanced N nutrition in oil olive cultivation for optimizing oil content production. A number of researchers have stated that limited nitrogen availability in the soil and excessive nitrogen fertilizer have a negative impact on flowering and fruit set [13,36,42,45]. In our study, the final fruit set was significantly enhanced in trees treated with 3–4 kg NH4NO3/tree compared to the rest of the N doses, indicating that improving fruit set may improve yields. On the other hand, several studies show that when the number of flowers is artificially reduced, the fruit set increases proportionally, resulting in a similar fruit load [46,47]. Moreover, leaf N concentrations under control and 1 kg NH4NO3/tree were below the optimum range (1.5–2.3%), indicating limited soil N availability, which leads to a reduction in the size of the photosynthetic apparatus and its efficiency [38]. According to [48], N deficiency has an adverse impact on fruit set, probably due to inadequate total quantities of nutrients available to the flowers when they develop into fruit. In addition, Fernández-Escobar et al. [8] noted that N in excess has a similar negative effect on flowers as N deficiency does. Erel et al. [13] did an experiment in a container to see how different amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the irrigation solution affected the flowering and fruit set of an olive tree (Olea europaea L. cv. Barnea). They observed that the highest N concentration in the irrigation solution (14.1 mM) decreased fruit set, but to a lesser extent than flowering.
Table 4 shows that the fruit weight, oil content, and maturation index increased over time, reaching their maximum values on 5–10 December, while no further increase was recorded during the following olive harvesting period from 20–25 December. This indicates that the appropriate time period to start olive harvesting is 5–10 December in order to avoid early cropping, which can reduce oil yields, or to avoid yield losses due to fruit shedding derived from late harvests. The addition of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree resulted in maximum yield, but the weight of 100 olives was significantly lower compared to the rest of the fertilization rates, which is not desirable for table olives. According to Silva et al. [38], nitrogen application decreased the fruit’s weight and size due to photosynthate partitioning. In addition, elevated nitrogen applications (4–6 kg NH4NO3/tree) had a negative impact on the maturation index relative to the control by extending the colouration period and fruit maturation [12,13,43]. The effect was more pronounced in trees receiving the two highest N doses (5–6 kg NH4NO3/tree). Silva et al. [38] reported that nitrogen application prolonged the period of colouration, reducing the fruit maturation index, particularly when applied at high rates (120 N kg ha−1). Fernández-Escobar et al. [49] observed a delay in fruit maturation in trees with elevated nitrogen levels. This delay was attributed to the elevated concentration of anthocyanin, a pigment responsible for the black colour of olive fruits.

4. Materials and Methods

Twenty-five-year-old irrigated olive trees of variety “Kalinioti” that had been grafted onto wild olive rootstock (O.e.v. Olester) were selected for the field trials. The experiment was conducted for 6 years at the Pomologie Research Centre in Agioi Saranta, South Albania. The trees were planted with a spacing of 7 m by 7 m, resulting in a density of approximately 204 trees per hectare. In addition, every year, the trees received a light pruning regime. Weeds were chemically controlled by applying glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl) glycine at a rate of 3 L/ha. We applied the glyphosate to the vegetation during the early spring season. There were no additional phytosanitary products used throughout the duration of the experiment. The area has a hot-summer Mediterranean climate (Csa) as of the Köppen climate classification. Monthly mean temperature (maximum, average, and minimum) and rainfall are shown in Table 5. During the years of experimentation, the area experienced a mean annual precipitation of about 781 mm, with the minimum temperature (2.8 °C) recorded in January and the highest temperature (34.4 °C) recorded in July. The soil of the experimental field was clay loamy, with slightly alkaline pH 7.8, rich in total CaCO3 (10.3%), poor in organic matter (1.2%), medium in total N (1.47 mg/g), relatively high in available K (0.45 meq/100 g) and very rich in available phosphorus (120 mg kg−1), indicating that phosphorus is more likely to be lost by runoff since levels of P-Olsen exceeded 60 mg kg−1 [50]. The experimental design included seven treatments, corresponding to seven ammonium nitrate (50% NH4+, 50% NO3) rates, 0 (control) to 6 kg/tree, which corresponded to approximately 0, 0.3, 0.7, 1.0, 1.4, 1.7, and 2 kg N/tree, respectively, or to 0, 61, 143, 204, 265, 347, and 408 kg ha−1 of N, respectively. These fertilization regimes were applied to three groups (three replicates) of five equally sized and well-developed olive trees. The selection of trees was based on criteria of uniformity for vigour and fruit load. Fertilizer was applied on a per-tree basis. Half of the fertilizer was given at the beginning of the annual cycle, in the first 10 days of March, and the rest was given at the fruit set [26], which approximately corresponded to the end of May and the beginning of June. Nitrogen fertilizers were distributed evenly on the soil over the green cover without burying. In addition to the N fertilizer treatments in the experimental design, all trees received a basal fertilizer application plan. In particular, 160 kg ha−1 of K2O as potassium sulphate and 56 kg ha−1 of P2O5 as superphosphate were incorporated into the soil at the end of February, according to farmer cultivation practices. Trees were drip-irrigated with one hundred litres of water per week.

4.1. Measurements

1. Vegetative growth: The length of 20 tagged shoots located at the four points of the horizon was recorded every year in two trees from each group (replicate), for a total of 40 shoots for each group.
2. Fruit set: The fruit set was expressed as the percentage of the initial number of flowers resulting in viable fruit. One hundred contiguous flowers on the four individual branches from the middle of the crown of one tree/replicate, located at the four points of the horizon, were labelled during the flowering period. These branches were used to determine the initial fruit set at the end of May, the beginning of June, and the final fruit set in November, which was actually the percentage of olive fruits remaining on the tree.
3. Olive yield: The harvest took place in the second half of December. The harvest was performed using wooden sticks, rakes, and small portable machines with spinning rubber ‘fingers’ that shake the olives from the branches. Five trees were harvested from each group and treated. The olive yields (kg/tree) were weighed separately per labelled tree.
4. Fruit weight (W100): The fresh weight of 100 fruits was measured from each tree in the groups (replicates), and thus a total of 500 fruits/group was taken. The fruits were weighed separately for each tree and group, and the weight of 100 fruits was calculated. Samples were taken every 15 days during November and December.
5. Maturation index (M.I.): Samples of 100 olive fruits per selected tree in each group (replicate) were selected every 15 days during November and December and were categorized into 8 colour classes based on epidermis and pulp colour (0 to 7) in order to determine the maturation index according to the following equation [51].
M.I. = (α × 0 + b × 1 + c × 2 + d × 3 +e x 4 + f × 5 + g × 6 + h × 7)/100
where a–h, are the numbers of fruits in each category and 1–7 are the numbers of colour classes.
The olives were classified into the following categories: 0, olives with intense green epidermis; 1, olives with yellowish-green epidermis; 2, olives with red spots or areas in less than half of the fruit; 3, olives with red or light violet epidermis over more than half; 4, for black epidermis and white pulp; 5 if the epidermis is black and less than half pulp is purple; 6, if the epidermis is black and more than half pulp purple (without reaching the stone); 7, if the epidermis is black and total pulp purple (reaching the stone).
Olive fruit samples were the same as those used the determination of the fruit weight (W100).
6. Canopy volume: For the determination of the canopy volume the following equation was used according to Roose et al. [52]:
V = 4/6 × π × H × R2 where V= volume (m3), π = 3.14, H = tree height (m) and R = radius of canopy
The canopy volume was measured separately per labelled tree.
7. Fruit chemical analysis: Oil content was determined on a sample of about 100 fruits per selected tree (5 trees per group), without any kind of infection or physical damage, by extracting dry material with petroleum ether at 40–60 °C using a Soxhlet apparatus. Olives were dried at 70 °C in a ventilated oven until a constant weight was measured in two successive weighing measurements. Then, olives were ground in a mortar and the paste was weighed and analysed by the Soxhlet apparatus [53].
8. Leaf analysis: Samples of 40 fully-expanded, mature leaves (5–8 months old) were collected from each of the five trees in each group at the end of July and from the middle portion of non-bearing, current-season shoots, taken at shoulder height, according to the method described by Koukoulakis and Papadopoulos [54]. Leaf samples were taken after a minimum of 6–8 weeks following full bloom, which typically occurs in mid-spring around April/May. This period was chosen because it guarantees that the nutrient levels in the leaves have reached a more stable state. Once in the laboratory, samples were washed using 1% Triton X-100 (Merck, Rahway, NJ, USA), and rinsed three times with water and deionized water. Moisture was eliminated using filter paper and the samples were dried in paper envelopes at 70 °C until they reached a constant weight. Dried samples were ground in a stainless “Fritch” pulverisette mill to pass through the 1 mm round whole sieve. Ground samples were stored at room temperature in acid-washed glass jars. Leaf samples were analysed for total N, P, and K. Total N was determined by the Kjeldahl method, using a semiautomatic analyser Buchi, B324 (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland). Prior to the measurement of the other nutrients, leaf subsamples were subjected to dry ashing at 520 °C for 6 h, then diluted with hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a 1:1 ratio v/v [55]. Phosphorus was determined calorimetrically in the same solution by the vanado-molybdo-phosphoric method [56] using an UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Total K was determined through atomic absorption spectrophotometry (PerkinElmer Analyst 100 atomic absorption spectrometer, PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

4.2. Statistical Analysis

The evaluation of the effect of the fertilizer treatments in each year of experimentation was provided by one-way ANOVA using SPSS version 21. Before performing analysis of variance, the Shapiro–Wilk (p ≤ 0.05) and Bartlett (p ≤ 0.05) tests were applied to test normality and homogeneity of variances, respectively. Duncan’s multiple-range test was used to test differences among means (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, considering the current experimental conditions, the application of 4 kg NH4NO3/tree (265 kg N ha−1) gave the highest yield while significantly reducing the weight of 100 olives, and therefore this dose is recommended for olive oil production. Similar yields were also achieved by the lower dose of fertilizer, 3 kg NH4NO3/tree (204 kg N ha−1), without reducing olive weight, indicating the appropriate fertilizer dose for table olives. Further additions of fertilizer caused reduced growth and a delay in fruit maturation. The best period for harvesting olives cv. Kalinioti seemed to be the beginning of December (5–10) when olive weight, oil content, and maturation index were at their maximum levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.K., C.P. and V.K.; methodology, D.K. and C.P.; validation, V.K., D.K. and C.P.; data curation, V.K.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K. and C.P.; writing—review and editing, V.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fernández-Escobar, R. Use and abuse of nitrogen in olive fertilization. Acta Hortic. 2011, 888, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kirkby, E. Introduction, Definition and Classification of Nutrients. In Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 3rd ed.; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2012; pp. 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ferreira, J.; García-Ortiz, A.; Frias, L.; Fernández, A. Los Nutrientes N, P, K en la fertilización del olivar. Olea 1986, 17, 141–152. [Google Scholar]
  4. Morales-Sillero, A.; Fernández, J.; Ordovás, J.; Suárez, M.; Pérez, J.A.; Liñán, J.; López, E.P.; Girón, I.; Troncoso, A. Plant-soil interactions in a fertigated ‘Manzanilla de sevilla’olive orchard. Plant Soil 2009, 319, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haberman, A.; Dag, A.; Shtern, N.; Zipori, I.; Erel, R.; Ben-Gal, A.; Yermiyahu, U. Significance of proper nitrogen fertilization for olive productivity in intensive cultivation. Sci. Horti. 2019, 246, 710–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fernández-Escobar, R.; García-Novelo, J.M.; Molina-Soria, C.; Parra, M.A. An approach to nitrogen balance in olive orchards. Sci. Hortic. 2012, 135, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Centeno, A.; García Martos, J.M.; Gómez-del-Campo, M. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and nitrification inhibitor product on vegetative growth, production and oil quality in ‘Arbequina’hedgerow and ‘Picual’vase-trained orchards. Grasas Aceites 2017, 68, 215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Marin, L.; Sánchez-Zamora, M.A.; García-Novelo, J.M.; Molina-Soria, C.; Parra, M.A. Long-term effects of N fertilization on cropping and growth of olive trees and on N accumulation in soil profile. Eur. J. Agron. 2009, 31, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boussadia, O.; Steppe, K.; Zgallai, H.; Ben El Hadj, S.; Braham, M.; Lemeur, R.; Van Labeke, M.C. Effects of nitrogen deficiency on leaf photosynthesis, carbohydrate status and biomass production in two olive cultivars ‘Meski’ and ‘Koroneiki’. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fernández-Escobar, R. Olive Nutritional Status and Tolerance to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reale, L.; Nasini, L.; Cerri, M.; Regni, L.; Ferranti, F.; Proietti, P. The influence of light on olive (Olea europaea L.) fruit development is cultivar dependent. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Erel, R.; Kerem, Z.; Ben-Gal, A.; Dag, A.; Schwartz, A.; Zipori, I.; Basheer, L.; Yermiyahu, U. Olive (Olea eurpaea L.) Tree Nitrogen Status Is a Key Factor for Olive Oil Quality. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 11261–11272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Erel, R.; Dag, A.; Ben-Gal, A.; Schwartz, A.; Yermiyahu, U. Flowering and fruit set of olive trees in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2008, 133, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Van Opstal, J.; Ben-Gal, A.; Schwartz, A.; Dag, A. The importance of olive (Olea europaea L.) tree nutritional status on its productivity. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 159, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dag, A.; Ben-David, E.; Kerem, Z.; Ben-Gal, A.; Erel, R.; Basheer, L.; Yermiyahu, U. Olive oil composition as a function of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium plant nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2009, 89, 1871–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zipori, I.; Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Ben-Gal, A.; Dag, A. Sustainable Management of Olive Orchard Nutrition: A Review. Agriculture 2020, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Marín, L. Nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards. Acta Hortic. 1999, 474, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. López-Granados, F.; Jurado-Expósito, M.; Álamob, S.; Garcıa-Torres, L. Leaf nutrient spatial variability and site-specific fertilization maps within olive (Olea europaea L.) orchards. Eur. J. Agron. 2004, 21, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sfakiotakis, E. Courses in Olive Growing; Typo MAN: Thesaloniki, Greece, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Parra, M.A.; Navarro, C.; Arquero, O. Foliar diagnosis as a guide to olive fertilization. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2009, 7, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ferreira, I.; Arrobas, M.; Moutinho Pereira, J.; Correia, C.; Rodrigues, M. The effect of nitrogen applications on the growth of young olive trees and nitrogen use efficiency. Turk. J. Agric. For. 2020, 44, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ferraj, B.; Teqja, Z.; Susaj, L.; Fasllia, N.; Gjeta, Z.; Vata, N.; Balliu, A. Effects of different soil management practices on production and quality of olive groves in Southern Albania. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2011, 9, 430–433. [Google Scholar]
  23. Weinbaum, S.A.; Picchioni, G.A.; Muraoka, T.T.; Ferguson, L.; Brown, P.H. Fertilizer nitrogen and boron uptake, storage, and allocation vary during the alternate-bearing cycle in pistachio trees. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1994, 119, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Marın, L.; Fernández-Escobar, R. Optimization of nitrogen fertilization in olive orchards. Acta Hortic. 1997, 448, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Benlloch, M.; Herrera, E.; Garcıa-Novelo, J.M. Effect of traditional and slow-release N fertilizers on growth of olive nursery plants and N losses by leaching. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 101, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xiloyannis, C.; Celano, G.; Palese, A.M.; Dichio, B.; Nuzzo, V. Mineral nutrient uptake from the soil in irrigated olive trees, cultivar Coratina, over six years after planting. Acta Hortic. 2002, 586, 453–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bustan, A.; Avni, A.; Yermiyahu, U.; Ben-Gal, A.; Riov, J.; Erel, R.; Zipori, I.; Dag, A. Interactions between fruit load and macroelement concentrations in fertigated olive (Olea europaea L.) trees under arid saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 152, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Yasuor, H.; Chamus, D.C.; Schwartz, A.; Ben-Gal, A.; Dag, A. Phosphorous nutritional level, carbohydrate reserves and flower quality in olives. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0167591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Haberman, A.; Dag, A.; Erel, R.; Zipori, I.; Shtern, N.; Ben-Gal, A.; Yermiyahu, U. Long-Term Impact of Phosphorous Fertilization on Yield and Alternate Bearing in Intensive Irrigated Olive Cultivation. Plants 2021, 10, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Connell, J.; Vossen, P.M. Fertility management for oil olives. In First Press, Newsletter of Olive Oil production and Evaluation. University of California Cooperative Extension: Santa Rosa, CA, USA, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sotiropoulos, S.; Chatzissavvidis, C.; Papadakis, I.; Kavvadias, V.; Paschalidis, C.; Antonopoulou, C.; Koriki, A. Inorganic and organic foliar fertilization in olives. Hortic. Sci. 2023, 50, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Sÿnchez-Zamora, M.A.; Uceda, M.; Beltran, G. The effect of nitrogen overfertilization on olive tree growth and oil quality. Acta Hortic. 2002, 586, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. López-Villalta, L.C.; Muñoz-Cobo, M.P. Production techniques. In World Olive Encyclopedia; International Olive Council: Sabadell, Spain, 1996; pp. 145–190. [Google Scholar]
  34. Therios, I. Olives: Crop Production Science in Horticulture; CABI Publishing; Wallingford, UK, 2009; p. 409.
  35. Fernández-Escobar, R. Fertilization. In Production Techniques in Olive Growing; International Olive Council: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 145–168. ISBN 9788493166366. [Google Scholar]
  36. Therios, I. Mineral nutrition of olive trees. In Proceedings of the 2nd Intl. Seminar Recent Advances Olive Industry, Mazara del Vallo, Italy, 5–10 November 2006; pp. 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  37. Fernández-Escobar, R. Fertilización. In El Cultivo del Olivo; Barranco, D., Fernández-Escobar, R., Rallo, L., Eds.; Editorial Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 1997; pp. 239–257. [Google Scholar]
  38. Silva, E.; Gonçalves, A.; Martins, S.; Pinto, L.; Rocha, L.; Ferreira, H.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Rodrigues, M.Â.; Correia, C.M. Moderate Nitrogen Rates Applied to a Rainfed Olive Grove Seem to Provide an Interesting Balance between Variables Associated with Olive and Oil Quality. Horticulturae 2023, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rodrigues, M.; Coelho, V.; Arrobas, M.; Gouveia, E.; Raimundo, S.; Correia, C.M.; Bento, A. The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the incidence of olive fruit fly, olive leaf spot and olive anthracnose in two olive cultivars grown in rainfed conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nicolì, F.; Negro, C.; Vergine, M.; Aprile, A.; Nutricati, E.; Sabella, E.; Miceli, A.; Luvisi, A.; De Bellis, L. Evaluation of Phytochemical and Antioxidant Properties of 15 Italian Olea europaea L. Cultivar Leaves. Molecules 2019, 24, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Skodra, C.; Titeli, V.S.; Michailidis, M.; Bazakos, C.; Ganopoulos, I.; Molassiotis, A.; Tanou, G. Olive Fruit Development and Ripening: Break on through to the “-Omics” Side. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ângelo Rodrigues, M.; Pavão, F.; Lopes, J.I.; Gomes, V.; Arrobas, M.; Moutinho-Pereira, J.; Ruivo, S.; Cabanas, J.E.; Correia, C.M. Olive Yields and Tree Nutritional Status during a Four-Year Period without Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 2011, 42, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Elbadawy, N.; Hegazi, E.; Yehia, T.; Abourayya, M.; Mahmoud, T. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield, Fruit Quality and Oil Content in Manzanillo Olive Trees. J. Arid. Land Stud. 2016, 26, 175–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Erel, R.; Yermiyahu, U.; Yasuor, H.; Ben-Gal, A.; Zipori, I.; Dag, A. Elevated fruit nitrogen impairs oil biosynthesis in olive (Olea europaea L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1180391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chatzissavvidis, C.A.; Therios, I.N.; Antonopoulou, C. Seasonal variation of nutrient concentration in two olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars irrigated with high boron water. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2004, 79, 683–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lavee, S.; Rallo, L.; Rapoport, H.; Troncoso, A. The floral biology of the olive: Effect of flower number, type and distribution on fruitset. Sci. Hortic. 1996, 66, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lavee, S.; Rallo, L.; Rapoport, H.; Troncoso, A. The floral biology of the olive: II. The effect of inflorescence load and distribution per shoot on fruit set and load. Sci. Hortic. 1999, 82, 181–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Freeman, M.; Uriu, K.; Hartmann, H.T. Diagnosing and correcting nutrient problems. In Olive Production Manual, 2nd ed.; Sibbett, G.S., Ferguson, L., Eds.; University of California Agricultural and Natural Resources Publication: Davis, CA, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  49. Fernández-Escobar, R.; Braz Frade, R.; Lopez Campayo, M.; Beltrán Maza, G. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on fruit maturation of olive trees. Acta Hortic. 2014, 1057, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Heckrath, G.; Brookes, P.C.; Poulton, P.R.; Goulding, K.W.T. Phosphorus leaching from soils containing different phosphorus concentrations in the Broadbalk experiment. J. Environ. Qual. 1995, 24, 904–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ferreira, J. Explotacionos Ollittareras Colaboradoras; No. 5; Ministerio de Agricultura: Madrid, Spain, 1979. [Google Scholar]
  52. Roose, M.L.; Atkin, D.; Kupper, R.S. Yield and tree size of four citrus cultivars on 21 rootstocks in California. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1989, 114, 678–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Donaire, J.P.; Sanchez-Raya, A.J.; Lopez-George, J.L.; Recalde, L. Etudes physiologiques et biochimiques de l’olive. I. Variation de la concentration de divers metabolites pendant son cycle evolutive. Agrochimica 1977, 21, 311–321. [Google Scholar]
  54. Koukoulakis, S.P.; Papadopoulos, A. The Interpretation of Foliar Analysis; Stamoulis Ed.: Athens, Greece, 2003; p. 516. [Google Scholar]
  55. Allen, S.E.; Grimshaw, H.M.; Parkinson, J.A.; Quarmby, C. Chemical Analysis of Ecological Materials; Allen, E., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK; London, UK, 1974; p. 565. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jackson, M.L. Phosphorus determinations for soils. Vanadomolybdo-phosphoric yellow color method in nitric acid system. In Soil Chemical Analysis; Jackson, M.L., Ed.; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1970; pp. 151–154. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on fruit yield, shoot length, and canopy volume of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 1. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on fruit yield, shoot length, and canopy volume of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Treatments (2)Yield
(kg/tree) 		Shoot Length (cm)Canopy Volume (m3)
Control37.09d (1)9.2g18.2c
1 kg NH4NO3/tree39.2d 11.4f19.4c
2 kg NH4NO3/tree45dc 12.8e 19.8bc
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 54b 16.9d 21.5b
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 62.5a19.3c 21.0bc
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 49.0c 24.7b 24.7a
6 kg NH4NO3/tree46.4cd30.2a 25.8a
ANOVA table F value (3)13.54 **5741.4 ***101.86 ***
(1) Means (values of 6 years) in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). (2) No. of samples per treatment and year (Yield: 15 trees; Shoot length: 120 shoots; Canopy volume: 15 trees). (3) Values of F: ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table 2. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on initial (May–June) and final (November) fruit set of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 2. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on initial (May–June) and final (November) fruit set of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Treatments (2) Initial Fruit Set (May–June) (%)Final Fruit Set (November) (%)
Control3.07e (1) (3) 0.7d
1 Kg NH4NO3/tree3.55d1.13d
2 Kg NH4NO3/tree5.32c 1.79c
3 Kg NH4N03/tree 6.09b2.53b
4 Kg NH4N03/tree 7.63a3.03a
5 Kg NH4N03/tree 5.91b1.71c
6 Kg NH4N03/tree5.19c1.65c
ANOVA table F value (3)1275.31 ***184.877 ***
(1) Means (values of 6 years) in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). (2) No. of selected flowers per treatment and year: 300. (3) Values of F: *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. The effect of time collection, on weight of 100 olives (W100, g./tree), oil content (OC, %), and maturation index (M.I., %) of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 3. The effect of time collection, on weight of 100 olives (W100, g./tree), oil content (OC, %), and maturation index (M.I., %) of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
1–5 November20–25 November5–10 December20–25 December
W100OCM.I.W100OCM.I.W100OCM.I.W100OCM.I.
Treatments (2)g%%g%%g%%g%%
Control336b (1)21.82.13a360a24.23.05a389a27.13.66a384a26.23.37a
1 kg NH4NO3/tree 325b21.32.10a353a23.83.15a375a26.83.75a375a26.53.44a
2 kg NH4NO3/tree321b21.22.18a342ab24.53.21a370a27.23.82a369a26.73.48a
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 318b21.02.12a329b23.73.28a365ab27.53.78a361a26.03.51a
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 381a20.92.10a309c23.53.15a337b26.33.66a331b25.83.55a
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 315c20.81.95ab345ab24.12.75ab374a26.83.16b370a25.93.00b
6 kg NH4NO3/tree312c21.1 NS1.87b340ab23.7 NS2.71b378a27.0 NS3.11b373a26.1 NS3.01b
ANOVA table, F value (3)664.30 ***1.99 NS10.72 **211.20 *1.66 NS43.12 ***179.17 *1.59 NS39.14 **202.18 ***1.41 NS35.05 **
(1) Means (values of 6 years) in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). ns: no significant differences. (2) No. of samples per treatment and year: W100:15; OC: 15; M.I.: Each of the 15 measurements is based on 100 olive fruits. (3) Values of F: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; NS: no significant differences.
Table 4. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on Ν, P, and K concentration of leaves of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Table 4. The effect of ammonium nitrogen fertilizer on Ν, P, and K concentration of leaves of olive (cv. Kalinioti) trees.
Treatments (2)Ν
(%, d.w.)		Ρ
(%, d.w.)		Κ
(%, d.w.)
Control1.23e (1)0.1230.78a
1 kg NH4NO3/tree1.34e0.125 0.75a
2 kg NH4NO3/tree1.55d0.1280.77a
3 kg NH4NO3/tree 1.89c0.1310.73a
4 kg NH4NO3/tree 2.01b0.1290.69ab
5 kg NH4NO3/tree 2.29a0.1200.61b
6 kg NH4NO3/tree2.38a0.115 NS0.57b
ANOVA table, F value (3)401.4 ***1.892 NS16.812 ***
(1) Means (values of 6 years) in the same column followed by different letters denote significant differences according to Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05). (2) No. Samples per treatment and year: 15. (3) Values of F, *** p < 0.001; NS: no significant differences.
Table 5. Average monthly temperature (including both the minimum and maximum values), precipitation, and relative humidity throughout the duration of the six-year trial period.
Table 5. Average monthly temperature (including both the minimum and maximum values), precipitation, and relative humidity throughout the duration of the six-year trial period.
Average Values Jan.Feb.Mar.Apr.May.Jun.Jul.Aug.Sep.Oct.Nov.Dec.
High Temp. (°C)13.313.916.719.424.431.734.433.928.323.318.313.9
Temp. (°C)6.77.211.715.020.624.427.228.321.718.312.28.3
Low Temp. (°C)2.83.35.69.413.916.720.019.416.711.77.84.4
precipitation (mm)87.689.470.647.531.216.58.121.361.096.5132.1119.4
Relative humidity (%)767475756552515666737576
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kotsias, D.; Kavvadias, V.; Pappas, C. Response of Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.) cv. Kalinioti to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application. Physiologia 2024, 4, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia4010002

AMA Style

Kotsias D, Kavvadias V, Pappas C. Response of Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.) cv. Kalinioti to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application. Physiologia. 2024; 4(1):43-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia4010002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kotsias, Dimitris, Victor Kavvadias, and Christos Pappas. 2024. "Response of Olive Trees (Olea europaea L.) cv. Kalinioti to Nitrogen Fertilizer Application" Physiologia 4, no. 1: 43-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/physiologia4010002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop