Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Identification of Culturable Gut Microbiota in the Larval Stage of Lesser Mealworm (Alphitobius diaperinus)
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Effects of Food Safety Training on the Microbiological Load Present in Equipment, Surfaces, Utensils, and Food Manipulator’s Hands in Restaurants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Clostridium pasteurianum Bioprocessing: Pioneering Circular Bioeconomy Advancements through Sustainable Resource Utilization †

ICSI Analytics, National Institute for Research and Development for Cryogenic and Isotopic Technologies—ICSI Rm. Vâlcea, 4th Uzinei Street, 240050 Râmnicu Vâlcea, Romania
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology, 1–15 December 2023; Available online: https://ecm2023.sciforum.net.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31(1), 11; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16490
Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology)

Abstract

:
The transition towards a circular bioeconomy represents a paradigm shift in sustainable resource management, aiming to synergize biological processes, waste valorization, and renewable product synthesis. A key contender in this transformative landscape is the versatile anaerobic bacterium Clostridium pasteurianum. With its unique metabolic capabilities, C. pasteurianum holds substantial promise as a cornerstone of bioprocessing strategies within the circular bioeconomy framework. As we navigate the path towards a sustainable and regenerative future, continued research and innovation are imperative to unlock the full potential of C. pasteurianum.

1. Introduction

The transition towards a circular bioeconomy marks a profound departure from the traditional linear economic model [1,2]. In the conventional “take–make–dispose” linear economy, resources are extracted, processed, used, and finally discarded as waste. This linear model has long been associated with overconsumption, resource depletion, environmental degradation, and an unsustainable approach to economic development. Waste generation is one of the repercussions of this typical linearly productive method. Moreover, economic growth has expedited the way that primary resources are extracted, produced, used, and disposed of, which has increased the amount of trash produced [3,4,5]. In contrast, the circular bioeconomy introduces a fundamental paradigm shift in how we conceptualize and manage resources.
The concept of the circular bioeconomy represents a paradigm shift in how modern society views and manages resources. It underscores the need to break away from the linear “take–make–dispose” model and instead foster a regenerative system where resources are used efficiently, waste is minimized, and environmental impact is curtailed. At the heart of this paradigm lies the aspiration to create a closed-loop system where biological processes are harnessed to their fullest potential and the value of resources is continually preserved and enhanced. The circular bioeconomy is founded on several key principles: resource efficiency, biological processes, waste valorization, renewable product synthesis, closed-loop systems, and environmental stewardship [1,2,6,7,8].
One of the core tenets of the circular bioeconomy is the seamless integration of biological processes with waste valorization and renewable product synthesis. This synergy is pivotal in achieving the overarching goals of sustainability and resource efficiency [1,9]. Biological processes/systems, such as the bacterium Clostridium pasteurianum (full scientific name: Clostridium pasteurianum Winogradsky, 1895), are key agents in this synergy. C. pasteurianum possesses enhanced abilities to convert organic materials into valuable products with high efficiency and minimal environmental impact.
This paper aims to shed light on the multifaceted potential of C. pasteurianum within the circular bioeconomy framework. By delving into its metabolic capabilities, its proficiency in acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation (acetone, butanol, and ethanol are produced in a ratio of 3:6:1), and its compatibility with biorefinery strategies, this review seeks to elucidate how C. pasteurianum can advance the circular bioeconomy’s goals of waste minimization, resource efficiency, and reduced environmental impact. Furthermore, it acknowledges the challenges that lie ahead in harnessing C. pasteurianum’s full potential and underscores the importance of continued research and innovation in this burgeoning field.

2. Clostridium pasteurianum: A Microbial Architect of Circular Bioeconomy

The genus Clostridium encompasses a diverse group of anaerobe bacteria with unique metabolic capabilities that hold significant potential within the circular bioeconomy. Among the many species within this genus, C. pasteurianum stands out as an exemplar due to its preeminent attributes and suitability for sustainable resource utilization. One of its most remarkable features is its ability to ferment an impressive array of feedstocks, ranging from lignocellulosic biomass to agricultural residues, and organic waste. Alongside ABE fermentation, C. pasteurianum exhibits a non-biphasic metabolism, alternatively producing 1,3-propanediol–butanol–ethanol (PBE fermentation). This metabolic flexibility grants C. pasteurianum the capacity to transform otherwise underutilized and often discarded resources into valuable biofuels and bio-based chemicals. C. pasteurianum has the ability to convert carbohydrates (e.g., glycerol, glucose, other hexoses, and biopolymers in the form of cellulose fibers and starches) into acetates, butanol, ethanol, and 1,3-propanediol (1,3-PDO) while releasing gaseous compounds (molecular hydrogen and carbon dioxide) [10,11,12,13]. The metabolism of this anaerobe bacterium can be switched from alcohols and reduced acids to volatile fatty acids (VFAs; for example, acetic, propionic, and butyric acids) in order to maximize the yield of molecular hydrogen from reduced fermentation end-products (e.g., butanol, ethanol, and lactate) [14,15,16,17]. The fermentation end-products of C. pasteurianum depend on the growth conditions (Table 1).
In summary, the data in Table 1 demonstrate the versatility of C. pasteurianum in utilizing various feedstocks (rice straw, crude glycerol) to produce a range of valuable gaseous (hydrogen) and liquid biofuels (butanol and ethanol) or organic chemicals (1,3-PDO). It is noteworthy that the generation of butanol and ethanol simultaneously declines as 1,3-PDO is produced. The bacterium’s ability to adapt to different growth conditions and efficiently convert these feedstocks underscores its potential in the circular bioeconomy, where waste materials and renewable resources can be harnessed for sustainable resource utilization and biofuel production.

3. Challenges and Future Directions

As we explore the potential of Clostridium pasteurianum within the circular bioeconomy, several challenges and opportunities emerge, paving the way for future research and innovation.
A promising avenue for advancing C. pasteurianum’s capabilities lies in genetic engineering. By manipulating its metabolic pathways and optimizing enzyme expression, researchers can potentially enhance the bacterium’s substrate utilization efficiency [21], product yields [21,22], and tolerance to inhibitory compounds [23]. Genetic modifications can also be employed to tailor C. pasteurianum for specific feedstocks or target products, thereby increasing its versatility in different circular bioeconomy applications [24,25].
The transition from laboratory-scale experiments to industrial applications presents a substantial challenge. Scaling up C. pasteurianum fermentation processes to meet commercial demands requires careful consideration of bioreactor design, process control, and the optimization of parameters such as pH, temperature, and nutrient supply. Addressing these challenges is crucial for achieving cost-effective and efficient large-scale production.
The concept of integrated biorefineries, where multiple valuable products are generated from the same feedstock, can be further explored. C. pasteurianum’s ability to produce both ABE and PBE fermentation products makes it an attractive candidate for the development of sustainable and multifunctional biorefinery systems.
In conclusion, while Clostridium pasteurianum offers immense potential within the circular bioeconomy, addressing challenges related to genetic engineering, scale-up, regulatory compliance, and safety is imperative for its successful industrial adoption. Additionally, leveraging the complementary PBE fermentation pathway and exploring novel feedstocks can unlock new possibilities for sustainable resource utilization and product diversification. These future directions hold promise for a more sustainable and regenerative bioeconomy driven by the metabolic prowess of C. pasteurianum.

Funding

This research was funded by the Romanian Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization through the NUCLEU Program, Contract No. 20N/05.01.2023, Project PN 23 15 04 01: “The cascade valorisation of agro-industrial waste of plant biomass type in bioproducts with added value in the circular bioeconomy system”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

R.T. is responsible for keeping and giving access to the data for the entire in silico work.

Acknowledgments

Administrative and technical support was given by the Ministry of Research, Innovation and Digitization through Program 1—Development of the national research and development system and Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects for financing excellence in R&D, Contract No. 19PFE/2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Handa, A.; Rajamani, P. Waste Management and Environment. In Basic Biotechniques for Bioprocess and Bioentrepreneurship; Bhatt, A.K., Bhatia, R.K., Bhalla, T.C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 391–413. ISBN 978-0-12-816109-8. [Google Scholar]
  2. Velenturf, A.P.M.; Purnell, P.; Macaskie, L.E.; Mayes, W.M.; Sapsford, D.J. A New Perspective on a Global Circular Economy. In Resource Recovery from Wastes: Towards a Circular Economy; Green Chemistry; The Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 3–22. ISBN 978-1-78801-381-9. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cerqueira, P.A.; Soukiazis, E.; Proença, S. Assessing the Linkages between Recycling, Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development: Evidence from the OECD Countries. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2021, 23, 9766–9791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Namlis, K.-G.; Komilis, D. Influence of Four Socioeconomic Indices and the Impact of Economic Crisis on Solid Waste Generation in Europe. Waste Manag. 2019, 89, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Minoglou, M.; Komilis, D. Describing Health Care Waste Generation Rates Using Regression Modeling and Principal Component Analysis. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 811–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gunasekaran, M.; Kumar, G.; Karthikeyan, O.P.; Varjani, S. Lignocellulosic Biomass as an Optimistic Feedstock for the Production of Biofuels as Valuable Energy Source: Techno-Economic Analysis, Environmental Impact Analysis, Breakthrough and Perspectives. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, S.Y.; Tan, X.; Show, P.L.; Rambabu, K.; Banat, F.; Veeramuthu, A.; Lau, B.F.; Ng, E.P.; Ling, T.C. Incorporating Biowaste into Circular Bioeconomy: A Critical Review of Current Trend and Scaling up Feasibility. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 19, 101034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mak, T.M.W.; Xiong, X.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Yu, I.K.M.; Poon, C.S. Sustainable Food Waste Management towards Circular Bioeconomy: Policy Review, Limitations and Opportunities. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 297, 122497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, A.; Nagrath, G. Biobusiness Opportunities. In Basic Biotechniques for Bioprocess and Bioentrepreneurship; Bhatt, A.K., Bhatia, R.K., Bhalla, T.C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 417–425. ISBN 978-0-12-816109-8. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sabra, W.; Wang, W.; Surandram, S.; Groeger, C.; Zeng, A.-P. Fermentation of Mixed Substrates by Clostridium Pasteurianum and Its Physiological, Metabolic and Proteomic Characterizations. Microb. Cell Factories 2016, 15, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Munch, G.; Mittler, J.; Rehmann, L. Increased Selectivity for Butanol in Clostridium Pasteurianum Fermentations via Butyric Acid Addition or Dual Feedstock Strategy. Fermentation 2020, 6, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sarchami, T.; Johnson, E.; Rehmann, L. Optimization of Fermentation Condition Favoring Butanol Production from Glycerol by Clostridium Pasteurianum DSM 525. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 208, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Munch, G.; Schulte, A.; Mann, M.; Dinger, R.; Regestein, L.; Rehmann, L.; Büchs, J. Online Measurement of CO2 and Total Gas Production in Parallel Anaerobic Shake Flask Cultivations. Biochem. Eng. J. 2020, 153, 107418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dabrock, B.; Bahl, H.; Gottschalk, G. Parameters Affecting Solvent Production by Clostridium Pasteurianum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 1233–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Berthomieu, R.; Pérez-Bernal, M.F.; Santa-Catalina, G.; Desmond-Le Quéméner, E.; Bernet, N.; Trably, E. Mechanisms Underlying Clostridium Pasteurianum’s Metabolic Shift When Grown with Geobacter Sulfurreducens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022, 106, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arbter, P.; Sabra, W.; Utesch, T.; Hong, Y.; Zeng, A. Metabolomic and Kinetic Investigations on the Electricity-aided Production of Butanol by Clostridium Pasteurianum Strains. Eng. Life Sci. 2020, 21, 181–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Detman, A.; Laubitz, D.; Chojnacka, A.; Wiktorowska-Sowa, E.; Piotrowski, J.; Salamon, A.; Kaźmierczak, W.; Błaszczyk, M.K.; Barberan, A.; Chen, Y.; et al. Dynamics and Complexity of Dark Fermentation Microbial Communities Producing Hydrogen From Sugar Beet Molasses in Continuously Operating Packed Bed Reactors. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 612344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Srivastava, N.; Srivastava, M.; Kushwaha, D.; Gupta, V.K.; Manikanta, A.; Ramteke, P.W.; Mishra, P.K. Efficient Dark Fermentative Hydrogen Production from Enzyme Hydrolyzed Rice Straw by Clostridium Pasteurianum (MTCC116). Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 238, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khanna, S.; Goyal, A.; Moholkar, V.S. Bioconversion of Biodiesel Derived Crude Glycerol by Immobilized Clostridium Pasteurianum: Effect of Temperature. Int. J. Chem. Biol. Eng. 2012, 6, 301–304. [Google Scholar]
  20. Krasňan, V.; Plž, M.; Marr, A.C.; Markošová, K.; Rosenberg, M.; Rebroš, M. Intensified Crude Glycerol Conversion to Butanol by Immobilized Clostridium Pasteurianum. Biochem. Eng. J. 2018, 134, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sarma, S.; Ortega, D.; Minton, N.P.; Dubey, V.K.; Moholkar, V.S. Homologous Overexpression of Hydrogenase and Glycerol Dehydrogenase in Clostridium Pasteurianum to Enhance Hydrogen Production from Crude Glycerol. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 284, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schwarz, K.M.; Grosse-Honebrink, A.; Derecka, K.; Rotta, C.; Zhang, Y.; Minton, N.P. Towards Improved Butanol Production through Targeted Genetic Modification of Clostridium Pasteurianum. Metab. Eng. 2017, 40, 124–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gallardo, R.; Alves, M.; Rodrigues, L.R. Influence of Nutritional and Operational Parameters on the Production of Butanol or 1,3-Propanediol from Glycerol by a Mutant Clostridium Pasteurianum. New Biotechnol. 2017, 34, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pyne, M.E.; Moo-Young, M.; Chung, D.A.; Chou, C.P. Expansion of the Genetic Toolkit for Metabolic Engineering of Clostridium Pasteurianum: Chromosomal Gene Disruption of the Endogenous CpaAI Restriction Enzyme. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2014, 7, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Grosse-Honebrink, A.; Schwarz, K.M.; Wang, H.; Minton, N.P.; Zhang, Y. Improving Gene Transfer in Clostridium Pasteurianum through the Isolation of Rare Hypertransformable Variants. Anaerobe 2017, 48, 203–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. The fermentation end-products of various C. pasteurianum strains.
Table 1. The fermentation end-products of various C. pasteurianum strains.
Feedstock
(Pretreatment)
[Carbon Source]
StrainGrowth ConditionsMain Product and Additional Fermentation ProductsReference
Rice straw
(enzymatic hydrolysis)
[glucose, xylose RS, arabinose RS]
MTCC 116shake flasks (150 mL); anaerobic chamber; rotation: 192 rpm; temperature: 37 ± 2 °CTotal H2 production: 2580 mL/L (from 54.18 g/L sugars in 144 h).
Maximum H2 production rate: 23.96 mL/L/h (recorded in 96 h).
SM: butyrate, acetate, formate, succinate.
NgA: ethanol, propionate.
[18]
Biodiesel-derived crude glycerol
(no pretreatment)
[glycerol]
MTCC 116, immobilized on silicacustom-built Erlenmeyer flasks (250 mL); anaerobic chamber; rotation: 200 rpm; temperature: 30/37/45 °C30 °C = the highest yield of 1,3-PDO (0.60 mol/mol substrate from 10 g/L substrate).
37 °C = the most suitable temperature for maximum yield of butanol (0.28 mol/mol substrate from 25 g/L substrate) and ethanol (0.27 mol/mol substrate from 10 g/L substrate).
45 °C = not suitable for fermentation.
[19]
Biodiesel-derived crude glycerol
(no pretreatment)
[glycerol 01 and glycerol 02, respectively]
DSM 525, entrapped into PVA particlesstirred bioreactor (1.3 L tank with 1.0 L of production medium); rotation: 200 rpm; temperature: 34 °C; 68 RBInitial glycerol concentration: 50.51 ± 2.77 g/L
Residual glycerol concentration: 10.46 ± 1.74 g/L
Fermentation time: 2.69 ± 0.05 h
Produced butanol: 8.38 ± 0.86 g/L
Butanol productivity 6.3X: 3.12 ± 0.33 g/L/h
Butanol yield: 0.21 ± 0.02 g/g
Produced 1,3-PDO: 3.22 ± 0.30 g/L
[20]
RS Residual sugars: C. pasteurianum was unable to efficiently use those sugars as compared to glucose. Bolded and underlined products: main products of the fermentation process; SM: secondary metabolites; NgA: negligible amounts; PVA: polyvinyl alcohol; glycerol 01 and 02: crude glycerol samples (89.55% and 52.66% glycerol content, respectively); 68 RB: 68 repeated batches (results are showed for the last 56th–68th batches, as the process duration gradually decreased until the 56th batch and was quite stable for the rest of them); 6.3X 6.3 times more butanol was produced from glycerol by PVA-entrapped cells than by free cells; butanol yield is calculated as final butanol concentration divided by concentration of utilized glycerol.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tamaian, R. Clostridium pasteurianum Bioprocessing: Pioneering Circular Bioeconomy Advancements through Sustainable Resource Utilization. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31, 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16490

AMA Style

Tamaian R. Clostridium pasteurianum Bioprocessing: Pioneering Circular Bioeconomy Advancements through Sustainable Resource Utilization. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 31(1):11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16490

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tamaian, Radu. 2024. "Clostridium pasteurianum Bioprocessing: Pioneering Circular Bioeconomy Advancements through Sustainable Resource Utilization" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 31, no. 1: 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16490

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop