Next Article in Journal
Breaking Sound Barriers: Exploring Tele-Audiology’s Impact on Hearing Healthcare
Next Article in Special Issue
The Dual Lens of Endoscopy and Histology in the Diagnosis and Management of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders—A Comprehensive Review
Previous Article in Journal
Fecal Calprotectin in Patients with Crohn’s Disease: A Study Based on the History of Bowel Resection and Location of Disease
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for Suspected Mirizzi Syndrome Type IV as Both a Diagnostic and Bridge-to-Surgery Procedure

Diagnostics 2024, 14(8), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080855
by Giacomo Emanuele Maria Rizzo 1,2, Settimo Caruso 3 and Ilaria Tarantino 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(8), 855; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14080855
Submission received: 20 March 2024 / Revised: 17 April 2024 / Accepted: 18 April 2024 / Published: 22 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Endoscopy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

ERCP is an important part of treating MS and pre-operational ERCP with stenting or ENBD might decrease the rate of peri-operative complications. Though MS can sometimes be difficult to diagnose, MRCP might provide clues to the diagnosis and classification of MS. Thus, it would be better if the image and description of the patient's MRCP be shown to the readers. And the reason that you choose to drain the patient with 2 plastic stents instead of other strategies like ENBD could also be explained to the readers and discussed in the manuscript. 

Author Response

Thank you for your appreciation and suggestions. We added the figure of the MRCP and explanation. We didn’t add many explanations about biliary drainage strategy on the paper due to the editorial limits for this type of article. However, we preferred to put two plastic stents to obtain a more stable internal drainage, reducing the possibility to dislocation. In fact, the ENBD may be an alternative option, but we did not use it because the patients sometimes try to remove or retract it, increasing the possibility to dislocate or remove it. We added reasons and explanations in the text of the manuscript.

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors I think it is a good article and with an interesting case. Yes, accept the manuscript for publication.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your appreciation.

Back to TopTop