Next Article in Journal
Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: Case Report and Update on Diagnosis and Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Immune Responses of Healthy Pregnant Women following an Elective Cesarean Section: Effects of Anesthetic Procedures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diagnosis by Endoscopic Ultrasonography-Guided Sampling through the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Differential Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions Using Detective Flow Imaging Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Diagnostics 2024, 14(9), 882; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14090882
by Haruo Miwa 1,*, Kazuya Sugimori 1, Shoichiro Yonei 1, Hayato Yoshimura 1, Kazuki Endo 1, Ritsuko Oishi 1, Akihiro Funaoka 1, Hiromi Tsuchiya 1, Takashi Kaneko 1, Kazushi Numata 1 and Shin Maeda 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2024, 14(9), 882; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14090882
Submission received: 27 March 2024 / Revised: 18 April 2024 / Accepted: 22 April 2024 / Published: 24 April 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a very interesting study on a novel technology called detective flow imaging  (DFI). 

1) Please, double check Figure 2 because to seems not related to the legend.

2) Please, state clearly in the method section the primary and secondary aims, and the relative outcomes.

3) I don't see figure 3

4) How was the final diagnoses made? Please specify, especially because mass forming pancreatitis may be challanging

5) There is no comparison with CH-EUS. This is a major limitation of this study that must be mentioned and discussed.

6) EUS-FNB is still needed for the diagnosis of SPL. Please mention this point in the discussion by citing PMID: 35915956

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

A very interesting study by Miwa et al. that evaluates the role of flow imaging endoscopic US in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic lesions. The study is novel and the research question of significant clinical importance. The manuscript is well written and appropriately structured. One minor comment:

-Besides  chi-square test in the various endpoints, wouldn't it be appropriate to, also, estimate the respective AUCs and compare them?

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor linguistic and phraseological revisions from a professional native speaker should be considered.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I have no further comments 

Back to TopTop