Next Article in Journal
Slime Mould Algorithm Based on a Gaussian Mutation for Solving Constrained Optimization Problems
Previous Article in Journal
Birth–Death Processes with Two-Type Catastrophes
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Zeros of the Differential Polynomials φfl(f(k))na
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Properties of Analytic Functions

by
Hatun Özlem Güney
1 and
Shigeyoshi Owa
2,*
1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Dicle University, Diyarbakır 21280, Türkiye
2
“1 Decembrie 1918” University of Alba Iulia, 510009 Alba Iulia, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mathematics 2024, 12(10), 1469; https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101469
Submission received: 24 February 2024 / Revised: 1 May 2024 / Accepted: 3 May 2024 / Published: 9 May 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Complex Analysis and Geometric Function Theory, 2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
In the present paper, we consider the class A ¯ of functions f ( z ) of the form f ( z ) = z + k = 1 a 1 + k 3 z 1 + k 3 that are analytic in the open unit disc U . If a 1 + k 3 = 0 for k 3 n   ( n = 1 , 2 , 3 , ) , then f ( z ) is given by f ( z ) = z + k = 2 a k z k . For such functions f ( z ) A ¯ , some interesting properties for subordinations and strongly starlike functions are given. Also, some interesting examples for the results are shown.

1. Introduction

Let A ¯ denote the class of functions f ( z ) of the form
f ( z ) = z + k = 1 a 1 + k 3 z 1 + k 3 ,
which are analytic in the open unit disc U = { z C : | z | < 1 } with the principal value for z 3 . If a 1 + k 3 = 0 for k 3 n   ( n = 1 , 2 , 3 , ) , then f ( z ) can be written as
f ( z ) = z + k = 2 a k z k
and denoted by f ( z ) A .
Remark 1.
A class of functions f ( z ) given by
f ( z ) = z + k = 1 a 1 + k 2 z 1 + k 2
which are analytic in U was considered by Owa [1] and Owa et al. [2].
If we consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = z 1 z 3 6 ( 1 α ) = z + k = 1 j = 1 k ( j + 5 6 α ) k ! z 1 + k 3
with 0 α < 1 , then f ( z ) satisfies
R e z f ( z ) f ( z ) = R e 1 + ( 1 2 α ) z 3 1 z 3 > α , ( z U ) .
Also, if f ( z ) is given by
f ( z ) = z 1 z 3 = z + k = 1 z 1 + k 3 ,
then for z = e i θ   ( 0 θ < 2 π ) , we have
R e f ( z ) = R e e i θ 1 e i θ 3 = R e e i 1 1 6 θ e i θ 6 e i θ 6 = 1 2 s i n 5 6 θ s i n 1 6 θ = 1 2 s i n θ 6 + 2 3 θ s i n θ 6 = 1 2 c o s 2 3 θ + c o s θ 6 s i n θ 6 2 s i n θ 3 c o s θ 3 = 1 2 2 c o s 2 θ 3 1 + 2 1 + c o s θ 3 1 c o s θ 3 s i n θ 3 c o s θ 3 = 1 2 2 c o s 2 θ 3 1 + 2 1 + c o s θ 3 s i n θ 3 s i n θ 3 c o s θ 3 = 1 2 4 c o s 2 θ 3 + 2 c o s θ 3 1 5 2 .
Thus, we have
R e z 1 z 3 > 5 2 , ( z U ) .
We can see this bound visualized geometrically in Figure 1.

2. Subordination Properties

Let f ( z ) and g ( z ) be analytic in U . Then, we say that f ( z ) is subordinate to g ( z ) , written as f ( z ) g ( z )   ( z U ) , if there exists a function w ( z ) analytic in U with w ( 0 ) = 0 and | w ( z ) | < 1   ( z U ) such that f ( z ) = g ( w ( z ) ) .
With the above definition, we know that if f ( z ) A ¯ and
g ( z ) = 1 + ( 1 2 α ) z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U , 0 α < 1 )
satisfy
f ( z ) g ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
then
R e f ( z ) > α , ( z U ) .
If f ( z ) A ¯ and g ( z ) satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) g ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
then
R e z f ( z ) f ( z ) > α , ( z U ) .
Also, if f ( z ) A ¯ and g ( z ) satisfy
1 + z f ( z ) f ( z ) g ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
then
R e 1 + z f ( z ) f ( z ) > α , ( z U ) .
Remark 2.
Let us consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = ( 2 α 1 ) z 6 ( 1 α ) log 1 z 3 3 ( 1 α ) z 3 2 + z 3 = z + 6 ( 1 α ) k = 1 1 k + 3 z 1 + k 3 ,
and then
f ( z ) = 1 + ( 1 2 α ) z 3 1 z 3 .
Now, we have to introduce the following lemma by Suffridge [3].
Lemma 1.
Let p ( z ) be analytic in U with p ( 0 ) = 1 and h ( z ) be analytic and starlike in U . If
z p ( z ) h ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
then
p ( z ) 0 z h ( t ) t d t , ( z U ) .
With the above lemma, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 1.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ and h ( z ) be given by
h ( z ) = z 1 z 3 6 ( 1 α ) , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 α < 1 ) . If f ( z ) satisfies
z f ( z ) h ( z ) = z 1 z 3 6 ( 1 α ) , ( z U ) ,
then
f ( z ) 0 z h ( t ) t d t = 0 z 1 1 t 3 6 ( 1 α ) d t , ( z U ) .
Proof. 
Let us define a function p ( z ) = f ( z ) for f ( z ) A ¯ . Then, p ( z ) is analytic in U , and p ( 0 ) = 1 . Also, h ( z ) is analytic and starlike in U . Thus, using Lemma 1, we say that if
z p ( z ) = z f ( z ) h ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
and then
p ( z ) = f ( z ) 0 z h ( t ) t d t , ( z U ) .
It follows that
0 z h ( t ) t d t = 0 z 1 1 t 3 6 ( 1 α ) d t = 3 1 z 3 1 u 6 α 6 2 u 6 α 5 + u 6 α 4 d u = 3 1 1 z 3 6 α 5 1 + ( 6 α 5 ) z 3 1 + ( 3 α 2 ) z 3 .
Theorem 2.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ and h ( z ) be given by
h ( z ) = z 1 z 3 6 ( 1 α ) , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 α < 1 ) . If f ( z ) satisfies
f ( z ) f ( z ) z h ( z ) = z 1 z 3 6 ( 1 α ) , ( z U ) ,
then
f ( z ) z 0 z h ( t ) t d t = 0 z 1 1 t 3 6 ( 1 α ) d t = 3 1 1 z 3 6 α 5 1 + ( 6 α 5 ) z 3 1 + ( 3 α 2 ) z 3 .
Proof. 
Letting p ( z ) = f ( z ) z for f ( z ) A ¯ , we know that
z p ( z ) = f ( z ) f ( z ) z .
Thus, we have the subordination (28) under the condition (27) by Lemma 1. □
Next, we introduce the lemma by Hallenbeck and Ruscheweyh [4].
Lemma 2.
Let a function p ( z ) be analytic in U with p ( 0 ) = 1 , and h ( z ) be analytic and convex in U . If p ( z ) satisfies
p ( z ) + z p ( z ) h ( z ) , ( z U ) ,
then
p ( z ) 1 z 0 z h ( t ) d t , ( z U ) .
Applying Lemma 2, we derive the following theorem.
Theorem 3.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
f ( z ) + z f ( z ) 1 + ( 1 2 α ) z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 α < 1 ) , and then
f ( z ) 1 z 0 z 1 + ( 1 2 α ) t 3 1 t 3 d t , ( z U ) .
Proof. 
Let us consider a function p ( z ) = f ( z ) in Lemma 2, and let h ( z ) be given by
h ( z ) = 1 + ( 1 2 α ) z 3 1 z 3 .
Then, p ( z ) is analytic in U with p ( 0 ) = 1 , and h ( z ) is analytic and convex in U . Thus, if f ( z ) satisfies the subordination (32), then f ( z ) satisfies (33). Here, we have
1 z 0 z 1 + ( 1 2 α ) t 3 1 t 3 d t = 1 z 0 z ( 2 α 1 ) + 2 ( 1 α ) 1 t 3 d t = 1 z ( 2 α 1 ) z + 6 ( 1 α ) 1 z 3 1 1 u 2 + u d u = ( 2 α 1 ) 6 ( 1 α ) 1 z 3 2 + 1 2 z 3 + 1 z log 1 z 3 .
Letting α = 1 2 in Theorem 3, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 1.
If f ( z ) A ¯ satisfies
f ( z ) + z f ( z ) 1 1 z 3 , ( z U )
then
f ( z ) 3 1 z 3 2 + 1 2 z 3 + 1 z log 1 z 3 .

3. Applications for Strongly Starlike Functions

Let us consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = z 6 z 3 + 1 2 z 3 2 + log 1 z 3 , ( z U ) .
Then, f ( z ) satisfies
f ( z ) = 1 + z 3 1 z 3
and
a r g f ( z ) < π 2 , ( z U ) .
We say that f ( z ) is strongly starlike in U . Also, if we consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = 0 z 1 + t 3 1 t 3 α d t , ( z U )
for some real α   ( 0 < α 1 ) , then f ( z ) satisfies
a r g f ( z ) = α a r g 1 + z 3 1 z 3 < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
This function f ( z ) given by (41) is said to be a strongly starlike function of order α in U .
Now, we introduce the following lemma by Fejér and Riesz [5] (also by Tsuji [6]).
Lemma 3.
Let a function f ( z ) be analytic in | z | 1 . Then, f ( z ) satisfies
1 1 | f ( z ) | ϱ | d z | 1 2 | z | = 1 | f ( z ) | ϱ | d z | , ( ϱ > 0 ) ,
where the above integral on the left-hand side is considered along the real axis.
Remark 3.
If we make a change of variables in Lemma 3, then the inequality (43) becomes
r r | f ( ρ e i θ ) | ϱ d ρ r 2 0 2 π | f ( r e i θ ) | ϱ d θ .
Also, we need to include the lemma by Gwynme [7].
Lemma 4.
Let f ( z ) be a complex-valued harmonic function defined on a neighborhood of a closed disk of radius 1 and center 0 in the complex plane. Then,
f ( r e i θ ) = 1 2 π 0 2 π f ( e i ρ ) 1 r 2 1 + r 2 2 r c o s ( θ ρ ) d ρ
and
1 2 π 0 2 π 1 r 2 1 + r 2 2 r c o s ρ d ρ = 1 .
Applying Lemma 3, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 4.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) α 2 , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 < α 1 ) , and then
a r g f ( z ) π 2 α , ( z U ) .
Proof. 
It follows that
log f ( z ) = log | f ( z ) | + i arg f ( z )
and
log f ( z ) = 0 z log f ( t ) d t = 0 z f ( t ) f ( t ) d t .
This implies that
a r g f ( z ) = Im log f ( z ) = Im 0 z f ( t ) f ( t ) d t = Im 0 r f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) e i θ d ρ 0 r Im e i θ f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) d ρ r r Im e i θ f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) d ρ r r f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) d ρ ,
where z = r e i θ   ( 0 θ < 2 π ) ,   0 r < 1 , and 0 ρ r . Using (44) with ϱ = 1 , we have
a r g f ( z ) r 2 0 2 π f ( r e i θ ) f ( r e i θ ) d θ = 1 2 0 2 π r e i θ f ( r e i θ ) f ( r e i θ ) d θ α 4 0 2 π d θ = π 2 α .
If we take α = 1 in Theorem 4, we obtain the following corollary.
Corollary 2.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 2 , ( z U )
and then
a r g f ( z ) < π 2 , ( z U ) .
Next, we derive the following theorem.
Theorem 5.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 < α 1 ) and some real β ( β 1 ) , and then
a r g f ( z ) < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
Proof. 
Using the method of the proof in Theorem 4, we say that
a r g f ( z ) = 1 2 0 2 π r e i θ f ( r e i θ ) f ( r e i θ ) d θ < α 4 0 2 π R e 1 + β r 3 e i θ 3 1 r 3 e i θ 3 d θ = α 4 0 2 π 1 + ( β 1 ) r 3 c o s θ 3 β r 3 2 1 2 r 3 c o s θ 3 + r 3 2 d θ = α 4 0 2 π 1 β 2 + 1 + β 2 1 r 3 2 1 + r 3 2 2 r 3 c o s θ 3 d θ .
Note that
0 2 π 1 r 3 2 1 + r 3 2 2 r 3 c o s θ 3 d θ = 3 0 2 π 3 1 r 3 2 1 + r 3 2 2 r 3 c o s ρ d ρ 2 π
and by Lemma 4, we obtain
a r g f ( z ) < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
Example 1.
Let us consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = 2 2 z 3 3 α , ( z U )
with α ( 0 < α 1 ) . It follows from (60) that
a r g f ( z ) = 3 α arg 2 z 3 < 3 α π 6 = π 2 α , ( z U )
and
z f ( z ) f ( z ) = α z 3 2 z 3 < α , ( z U ) .
Therefore, if we consider some real β such that β 3 , then we have
z f ( z ) f ( z ) < α α ( 1 β ) 4 < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U ) .
Next, we prove the following theorem.
Theorem 6.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 < α 1 ) and some real β ( β 1 ) , and then
arg f ( z ) z < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
Proof. 
It follows that
log f ( z ) z = log f ( z ) z + i arg f ( z ) z
and
log f ( z ) z = 0 z log f ( t ) t d t = 0 z f ( t ) f ( t ) 1 t d t .
Thus, we know that
arg f ( z ) z = Im log f ( z ) z = Im 0 z f ( t ) f ( t ) 1 t d t = Im 0 r f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) 1 ρ e i θ e i θ d ρ 0 r Im f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) 1 ρ e i θ e i θ d ρ r r e i θ f ( ρ e i θ ) f ( ρ e i θ ) 1 ρ d ρ 1 2 0 2 π r e i θ f ( r e i θ ) f ( r e i θ ) 1 d θ < α 4 0 2 π R e 1 + β r 3 e i θ 3 1 r 3 e i θ 3 d θ π 2 α .
Thus, we complete the proof of the theorem. □
Example 2.
Let us consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
f ( z ) = z 2 2 z 3 3 α , ( z U )
with α ( 0 < α 1 ) . Noting that a function w ( z ) given by
w ( z ) = 2 2 z 3
implies
w ( z ) 4 3 < 2 3 , ( z U ) .
This gives us
arg w ( z ) = arg 2 2 z 3 < π 6 , ( z U ) .
Thus, we see that
arg f ( z ) z = 3 α arg 2 2 z 3 < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
Further, f ( z ) satisfies
z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 = α z 3 2 z 3 < α , ( z U ) .
Thus, if we consider some real β such that β 3 , we have
z f ( z ) f ( z ) 1 < α α ( 1 β ) 4 < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U ) .
Using the same method, we have the following theorem.
Theorem 7.
Let f ( z ) A ¯ satisfy
z f ( z ) f ( z ) + 1 z f ( z ) f ( z ) < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U )
for some real α ( 0 < α 1 ) and some real β ( β 1 ) , and then
arg z f ( z ) f ( z ) < π 2 α , ( z U ) .
We also consider the following example for Theorem 7.
Example 3.
We consider a function f ( z ) A ¯ given by
z f ( z ) f ( z ) = 2 2 z 3 3 α , ( z U )
with α ( 0 < α 1 ) . Then, we see that
arg z f ( z ) f ( z ) = 3 α arg 2 2 z 3 < π 2 α , ( z U )
and
z f ( z ) f ( z ) + 1 z f ( z ) f ( z ) < α , ( z U ) .
Considering some real β such that β 3 , we have
z f ( z ) f ( z ) + 1 z f ( z ) f ( z ) < α α ( 1 β ) 4 < α 2 R e 1 + β z 3 1 z 3 , ( z U ) .

4. Conclusions

In this paper, we consider functions f ( z ) given by
f ( z ) = z + k = 1 a 1 + k 3 z 1 + k 3
that are analytic in the open unit disc U = z C : | z | < 1 and explore new properties of f ( z ) A ¯ . We present some interesting properties for subordinations and strongly starlike functions, along with some interesting examples that support our results, proven with theorems. The authors think that the results in this paper will provide new directions and contribute to the development of a new perspective on studies in Geometric Function Theory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Ö.G. and S.O.; investigation, H.Ö.G. and S.O.; methodology, H.Ö.G. and S.O.; writing—original draft, S.O.; writing—review and editing, H.Ö.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used to support this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Owa, S. An application of Carathéodory functions. Konuralp J. Math. 2017, 5, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Owa, S.; Srivastava, H.M.; Hayami, T.; Kuroki, K. A new general idea for starlike and convex functions. Tamkang J. Math. 2016, 47, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Suffridge, T.J. Some remarks on convex maps of the unit disk. Duke Math. J. 1970, 37, 775–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hallenbeck, D.J.; Ruscheweyh, S. Subordination by convex functions. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1975, 52, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fejér, L.; Riesz, F. Über einige funktionentheoretische Ungleichungen. Math. Z. 1921, 11, 305–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tsuji, M. Complex Function Theory; Maki Book Comp.: Tokyo, Japan, 1968. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gwynne, E. The Poisson Integral Formula and Representations of SU(1, 1). Rose-Hulman Undergrad. Math. J. 2011, 12, 1. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. R e z 1 z 3 > 5 2 .
Figure 1. R e z 1 z 3 > 5 2 .
Mathematics 12 01469 g001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Güney, H.Ö.; Owa, S. New Properties of Analytic Functions. Mathematics 2024, 12, 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101469

AMA Style

Güney HÖ, Owa S. New Properties of Analytic Functions. Mathematics. 2024; 12(10):1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101469

Chicago/Turabian Style

Güney, Hatun Özlem, and Shigeyoshi Owa. 2024. "New Properties of Analytic Functions" Mathematics 12, no. 10: 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12101469

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop