Next Article in Journal
Assay Development for Phagocytosis Activity Evaluation
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Biohydrogen Production from Food Waste via Separate Hydrolysis and Fermentation: A Sustainable Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium purpureum: Highly Efficient Extraction, Purification, and Microencapsulation for Food Applications †

by
Arisbe Silva-Núñez
,
Javier Donoso-Quezada
and
José González-Valdez
*
School of Engineering and Science, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey CP 64849, Nuevo León, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology, 1–15 December 2023; Available online: https://ecm2023.sciforum.net.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16481
Published: 30 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Microbiology)

Abstract

:
This study presents a characterization of phycoerythrin (PE) derived from Porphyridium purpureum, a marine microalga. P. purpureum was grown and phycoerythrin was extracted and concentrated to 0.3 mg/mL and a purity index of 6.05. Subsequently, PE was evaluated for its antiproliferative activity against the HEPG2 cell line, a representative model for hepatic cancer. In addition, the study introduces an electrospray-assisted technique to encapsulate the pigment. The results reveal that the pigment exhibited remarkable antiproliferative activity, and an encapsulation efficiency of 99% was achieved. The study serves as a foundation for further exploration and development of P. purpureum-derived phycoerythrin as a versatile and valuable bioactive compound.

1. Introduction

Phycoerythrin is a red fluorescent pigment belonging to the phycobiliprotein family. These proteins are the main component of the light-harvesting complexes in red algae, but can also be found in cyanobacteria [1]. Phycoerythrin has been used as a fluorescent marker in flow cytometry [2]. However, it has also been shown to present antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity [3,4,5]. These properties have made phycoerythrin an interesting compound to study due to the potential applications it may have in different industries, such as food, biomedicine, and cosmetics [6].
Unfortunately, practical applications for phycoerythrin have been limited because it is a pigment that is sensitive to environmental factors, such as changes in pH, light, or temperature [7]. Because of this, encapsulation has emerged as an attractive alternative to address these challenges [8]. Encapsulation consists of trapping a compound of interest in a protective matrix to protect it from external factors and increase its stability [9].
This research aims to shed light on the potential of phycoerythrin as a highly valuable bioactive compound and the promising role that microencapsulation can play in unlocking its full potential.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Microalgae Growth

The marine strain Porphyridium purpureum (UTEX LB 2757) was procured from UTEX (UTEX, Austin, TX, USA) and cultivated in F/2 medium. This cultivation process was carried out with control measures, including a 12 h light/12 h dark cycle using LED lamps that consistently emitted an average intensity of 90 µmol/m2/s. To maintain optimal growth conditions, aeration was provided via an air pump (HAGEN, 801), ensuring a constant air flow rate of 1 L/m2/min. The culture thrived under these conditions for a 14-day incubation period, preparing the groundwork for subsequent phycoerythrin extraction.

2.2. Phycoerythrin Extraction, Quantification, and Purification

The harvested P. purpureum underwent cell disruption through a series of freeze–thaw cycles. Specifically, 1 L of P. purpureum was frozen at −80 °C for 4 h, followed by thawing with hot water (30 °C) for 30 min. This process was repeated three times.
Subsequently, the extract underwent two rounds of filtration. The first filtration employed a membrane with a 10 kDa MWCO (Koch Membrane Systems Inc., Wilmington, NC, USA), and the second filtration utilized a membrane with a 2 kDa MWCO (GE Healthcare, Wood Dale, IL, USA). After passing through the 10 kDa membrane, the permeate was discarded, and the retentate underwent another filtration step using the 2 kDa membrane.
The phycoerythrin content was determined by measuring the absorbance at 564, 592, and 455 nm using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Varioskan Flash, Waltham, MA, USA). These absorbance values were then applied to the Beer and Eshel equation (Equation (1)) [10].
PE (mg/mL) = [(OD564 − OD592) − (OD455 − OD592) × 0.2] × 0.12
To determine the PE purity, absorbances at 565 nm and 280 nm were measured. The absorbance values at 565 nm and 280 nm were indicative of PE and protein concentrations, respectively [11,12]. The purity index was calculated using Equation (2):
Purity index = A565/A280

2.3. In Vitro Evaluation of Anticancer Activity

The HepG2 human hepatoma cell line was cultured in DMEM-F12 medium, supplemented with 20% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. For the experimental setup, 96-well plates were prepared with 20,000 cells per well.
Various concentrations of phycoerythrin (ranging from 0.05 to 0.30 mg/mL) were utilized in the study. The assessment of antiproliferative activity was conducted after 24 h using the CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), following previously established protocols [13].

2.4. Microencapsulation of Phycoerythrin

A 2% w/v alginate solution was blended with a PE solution (0.3 mg/mL). A 2% w/v calcium chloride solution was separately prepared by dissolving it in distilled water at pH 4.0 (adjusted with 1 N acetic acid) for 20 min.
Microencapsulation was carried out using a Yflow Startup Electrospinning Machine (Malaga, Spain). Solutions containing phycoerythrin and sodium alginate were introduced through a 10 mL syringe at a flow rate of 15 µL/min. The nozzle was positioned 5 cm away from the collector, which contained a 2% CaCl2 solution. The applied voltage differential was 5.4 kV.

2.5. Encapsulation Efficiency

The encapsulation efficiency was determined using the following equation [14]. This calculation involved measuring the initial mass of phycoerythrin which was added and the mass that remained in the calcium chloride solution (Equation (3)).
EE % = Mass   of   PE   added   at   the   beginning Mass   of   not   coated   PE Mass   of   PE   added   at   the   beginning × 100

2.6. Morphological Characterization of Microcapsules

Microparticle morphology was assessed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) utilizing a Carl Zeiss EVO MA 10 instrument (Oberkochen, Germany). Initially, the microcapsules were affixed to stubs using double-sided carbon adhesive tape. Subsequently, a delicate gold coating was applied to the stubs. A magnification of 100X was used. The acceleration voltage employed was 5.00 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Phycoerythrin Extraction

In this study, using the phycoerythrin extraction method through membrane filtration, a concentration of 0.3 mg/mL and a purity index of 6.05 were achieved.
The extraction of phycoerythrin is a process that requires specialized techniques. Through research, several strategies have been developed to efficiently isolate this compound. Solvent-based methods involve the use of organic solvents such as acetone or ethanol to dissolve the pigments and proteins present in the algal biomass. On the other hand, aqueous extraction uses water as a solvent to gently extract phycoerythrin. Precise control of temperature and pH during extraction is critical to maintaining the stability of the phycoerythrin. Although these techniques are effective, it is important to consider factors such as cost and safety, as some methods involve hazardous solvents. Therefore, the approach employed in this study represents a more environmentally friendly and economical alternative to conventional methods.

3.2. Phycoerythrin Encapsulation

Under the previously mentioned conditions, encapsulation of phycocyanin using sodium alginate demonstrated an 99% (±0.16%) encapsulation efficiency. This suggests that these capsules have great potential for future research aimed at determining whether the stability provided by encapsulation improves or enhances the bioactivity of this phycobiliprotein.
In this study, the alginate microcapsules displayed approximate diameters of 671 µm, in line with earlier research results [14]. Nonetheless, when alginate alone is employed in the creation of microcapsules, it frequently results in structures featuring highly porous walls, which could potentially result in the loss of the core substance.
The surface, shape, and size of the capsules produced can be seen in Figure 1.

3.3. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity of Phycoerythrin

An in vitro assessment of the antiproliferative activity of phycoerythrin at different concentrations (ranging from 0.05 to 0.30 mg/mL) was conducted against the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2). It was observed that the phycoerythrin concentration exerted a dose-dependent effect on cell viability, a finding that is consistent with previous reports by other authors [15].
The highest anticancer activity was observed at the highest concentration, resulting in a cell viability of 30.71% (±6.18%), while the lowest activity was found at the concentration of 0.05 mg/mL, with a cell viability of 85.73% (±8.14%). These findings align with those reported by other researchers when examining the effect of phycoerythrin on the HepG2 cell line. However, it is worth noting that the previously studied phycoerythrin was extracted from different species, such as Microchaete, Porphyra yezoensis, and Portieria hornemannii [3,4,5]. In Pyropia yezoensis and Portieria hornemannii, the evaluation of the antiproliferative effect was also measured at 24 h. However, in the study carried out with Microchaete, the measurement was performed at 72 h. Further studies are needed to determine the antiproliferative activity of phycoerythrin over time.
The antiproliferative effect of phycoerythrin at different concentrations is illustrated in Figure 2.

4. Conclusions

Phycoerythrin was successfully extracted from the microalga Porphyridium purpureum, reaching a concentration of 0.3 mg/mL. Subsequently, this phycobiliprotein was effectively microencapsulated using an electrospray-assisted technique with sodium alginate as the encapsulating material. The encapsulation efficiency achieved was 99%, and morphological characterization of the capsules revealed diameters ranging from 600 to 700 nm. When tested against the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2), phycoerythrin exhibited significant antiproliferative activity, achieving a cell viability of 30.71% (±6.18%) at the highest evaluated concentration, which was 0.30 mg/mL. This opens up further research lines aiming at extending the studies of the biological activity of phycoerythrin and considering the beneficial effects it can have on health, as well as assessing several ways to increase its stability to environmental factors in order to expand its uses in a variety of industries.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G.-V.; methodology, A.S.-N. and J.G.-V.; formal analysis, A.S.-N.; investigation, A.S.-N. and J.D.-Q.; resources, J.G.-V.; data curation, A.S.-N. and J.D.-Q.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.-N.; writing—review and editing, A.S.-N. and J.D.-Q.; supervision, J.G.-V.; project administration, J.G.-V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the School of Engineering and Science and the FEMSA-Biotechnology Center at Tecnológico de Monterrey for their support through the Molecular and Systems Bioengineering Research Group. Javier Donoso-Quezada and Arisbe Silva-Nuñez express their gratitude to the National Council for the Humanities, Sciences, and Technologies of Mexico (CONAHCyT) for providing financial support in the form of PhD scholarships, with reference numbers 995384 and 888365, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, W.; Su, H.-N.; Pu, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, L.-N.; Liu, Q.; Qin, S. Phycobiliproteins: Molecular structure, production, applications, and prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 340–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hulspas, R.; Dombkowski, D.; Preffer, F.; Douglas, D.; Kildew-Shah, B.; Gilbert, J. Flow cytometry and the stability of phycoerythrin-tandem dye conjugates. Cytometry 2009, 75A, 966–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hemlata; Afreen, S.; Fatma, T. Extraction, purification and characterization of phycoerythrin from Michrochaete and its biological activities. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Senthilkumar, N.; Kurinjimalar, C.; Thangam, R.; Suresh, V.; Kavitha, G.; Gunasekaran, P.; Rengasamy, R. Further studies and biological activities of macromolecular protein R-Phycoerythrin from Portieria hornemannii. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ulagesan, S.; Nam, T.-J.; Choi, Y.-H. Extraction and Purification of R-Phycoerythrin Alpha Subunit from the Marine Red Algae Pyropia Yezoensis and Its Biological Activities. Molecules 2021, 26, 6479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ardiles, P.; Cerezal-Mezquita, P.; Salinas-Fuentes, F.; Órdenes, D.; Renato, G.; Ruiz-Domínguez, M.C. Biochemical Composition and Phycoerythrin Extraction from Red Microalgae: A Comparative Study Using Green Extraction Technologies. Processes 2020, 8, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ghosh, T.; Mishra, S. Studies on Extraction and Stability of C-Phycoerythrin From a Marine Cyanobacterium. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2020, 4, 561714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hsieh-Lo, M.; Castillo, G.; Ochoa-Becerra, M.A.; Mojica, L. Phycocyanin and phycoerythrin: Strategies to improve production yield and chemical stability. Algal Res. 2019, 42, 101600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oluwaseun, P.; Mohammad, N. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds by “extrusion” technologies: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 3100–3118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Beer, S.; Eshel, A. Determining phycoerythrin and phycocyanin concentrations in aqueous crude extracts of red algae. Mar. Freshw. Res. 1985, 36, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, L.-N.; Chen, X.-L.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-Z.; Zhou, B.-C. One-step chromatography method for efficient separation and purification of R-phycoerythrin from Polysiphonia urceolata. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 116, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Galland-Irmouli, A.V.; Pons, L.; Lucon, M.; Villaume, C.; Mrabet, N.T.; Guéant, J.L.; Fleurence, J. One-step purification of R-phycoerythrin from the red macroalga Palmaria palmata using preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2000, 739, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Donoso-Quezada, J.; Guajardo-Flores, D.; González-Valdez, J. Enhanced exosome-mediated delivery of black bean phytochemicals (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for cancer treatment applications. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ying, X.; Gao, J.; Lu, J.; Ma, C.; Lv, J.; Adhikari, B.; Wang, B. Preparation and drying of water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) double emulsion to encapsulate soy peptides. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xie, J.; Jiang, J.; Davoodi, P.; Srinivasan, M.P.; Wang, C.-H. Electrohydrodynamic atomization: A two-decade effort to produce and process micro-/nanoparticulate materials. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 125, 32–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM micrograph of produced microcapsules. Segment A is 671.2 µm long; segment B is 744.8 µm long.
Figure 1. SEM micrograph of produced microcapsules. Segment A is 671.2 µm long; segment B is 744.8 µm long.
Blsf 31 00013 g001
Figure 2. Antiproliferative effect of different concentrations of phycoerythrin.
Figure 2. Antiproliferative effect of different concentrations of phycoerythrin.
Blsf 31 00013 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva-Núñez, A.; Donoso-Quezada, J.; González-Valdez, J. Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium purpureum: Highly Efficient Extraction, Purification, and Microencapsulation for Food Applications. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2024, 31, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16481

AMA Style

Silva-Núñez A, Donoso-Quezada J, González-Valdez J. Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium purpureum: Highly Efficient Extraction, Purification, and Microencapsulation for Food Applications. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2024; 31(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16481

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva-Núñez, Arisbe, Javier Donoso-Quezada, and José González-Valdez. 2024. "Phycoerythrin from Porphyridium purpureum: Highly Efficient Extraction, Purification, and Microencapsulation for Food Applications" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 31, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECM2023-16481

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop