Forests as Nature-Based Solutions: Ecosystem Services, Multiple Benefits, and Trade-Offs

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 31 August 2024 | Viewed by 351

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Slovenian Forestry Institute, Večna Pot 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Interests: environmental valuation; ecosystem service mapping; governance models for natural resources; management of stakeholders

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Croatian Forest Research Institute, Cvjetno Naselje 41, 10450 Jastrebarsko, Croatia
Interests: perceptions; preferences; attitudes and behaviour of stakeholders; participatory approaches; cultural ecosystem services; urban forest and green space policy and governance
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Nature-based Solutions (NbS), as conceptualized by IUCN, are actions related to effective protection, sustainable management, and restoration efforts to recover degraded ecosystems, which in turn has benefits on human well-being and the status of biodiversity. Thus, NbS are suitable means to address various societal challenges, including climate change, biodiversity losses, decreases in productivity, water security, risks of pests and diseases, as well as challenges regarding non-sustainable materials.

NbS are closely related to ecosystem services (ES) as these solutions foster the natural capacity of ecosystems to provide ES and thus leverage and enhance ES. As such, NbS rely on natural processes and ES to address challenges rather than relying solely on artificial, engineered solutions. Forests, being one of the most preserved and relatively abundant natural ecosystems, have great potential to provide NbS by, for example, sequestering carbon and mitigating climate change, regulating microclimates, decreasing the costs of cooling/heating, providing spaces for outdoor recreation and contributing to public health, providing wood as a building material and source of energy, providing soil cover and decreasing erosion rates, etc.

However, there are several challenges related to the implementation of NbS in forestry, such as the tendency to prioritize economic outcomes as opposed to engineered solutions, the lack of awareness and understanding of the concept of NbS and the benefits they bring, policy and regulatory barriers, the professional expertise needed for implementing NbS, information/data gaps regarding the ecological effectiveness of NbS, issues related to scale and replicability, etc.

We welcome papers that investigate those NbS-related challenges either (1) in the context of the ecological restoration, conservation, or enhancement of forests’ capacity to provide ES or (2) as studies of stakeholders’ (e.g., forest owners and decision makers) perceptions, attitudes, positions towards adapting/altering forest management to enhance the supply of ES, or even (3) the preferences of the general public and businesses regarding implementing different NBS-related strategies, as they are commonly the ones that benefit from the increased provision of forest ES.

Dr. Anže Japelj
Dr. Silvija Krajter Ostoić
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • nature-based solutions
  • forest ecosystem services
  • forest owners
  • trade-offs among ES
  • policy uptake of NBS
  • sustainable management
  • environmental equality
  • socio-ecological systems

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 761 KiB  
Article
Forest Worker Households in the NFPP: Enhancing Sustainable Livelihoods through Capital and Transformation
by Bo Yu, Bo Cao and Hongge Zhu
Forests 2024, 15(6), 936; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15060936 - 28 May 2024
Abstract
The persistent conflict between strict conservation and community welfare highlights the growing need to address sustainable livelihoods in forest protection programs. The Natural Forest Protection Program (NFPP) is a comprehensive forest protection program spearheaded by the Chinese government. It is designed to facilitate [...] Read more.
The persistent conflict between strict conservation and community welfare highlights the growing need to address sustainable livelihoods in forest protection programs. The Natural Forest Protection Program (NFPP) is a comprehensive forest protection program spearheaded by the Chinese government. It is designed to facilitate the conservation and restoration of forest ecosystems through a range of interventions, including logging ban, management, tending, and afforestation efforts. Drawing upon longitudinal micro-level household survey data spanning five consecutive years from 2017 to 2021, this research quantifies the sustainable livelihood levels of frontline participants in the NFPP by examining two dimensions: livelihood capital stock and livelihood transformation capacity. Additionally, it investigates the internal differentiation phenomenon within this cohort. The findings suggest that forest worker households engaged in tasks related to forest management, tending, and afforestation are the frontline participants in the NFPP, in contrast to management, technical, and service personnel. Moreover, these forest worker households exhibit a pattern characterized by a higher livelihood capital stock but a lower livelihood transformation capacity compared to non-forest worker households. Furthermore, within forest worker households, there is a significant group differentiation phenomenon, resulting in inter-group differentials in the sustainable livelihood levels based on geographical and seniority stratification criteria. The developers of the global forest protection program should prioritize addressing the sustainable livelihood issues of frontline participants in the program, especially the real problem of mismatches between livelihood capital stock and livelihood transformation capacity. This can be achieved through designing income incentives, stimulating consumption, and other means to enhance the relatively disadvantaged position of frontline participants while balancing the coordination and fairness of the protection program based on the aspects of both protection and development. Full article
Back to TopTop