Renewal, Innovation, and Transformation: The Changing Face of Judaism in Modern Times

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2024 | Viewed by 2194

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Religious Studies, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3225, USA
Interests: Judaism; Jewish spirituality; new movements; egalitarian; borderline communities
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The decades following World War II have witnessed momentous changes in the character of Judaism, in the variety of its groups, and their interactions with larger cultural trends. This has been demonstrated in the formations of numerous new movements, spiritualities, modes of prayer, leadership patterns, and educational or outreach venues.  These transformations have affected all segments of Jewry, at times unwittingly.

Many have noticed the growth in numbers, firmness, and political clout of anti-modernist Ultra-Orthodox groups, including yeshivot, Hasidic courts, and Ultra-Orthodox towns and neighborhoods. Hardalim amalgamated Ultra Nationalism with Ultra-Orthodoxy. The movement, which emerged in the 1980s‒1990s currently makes up the bulk of the ideologically committed settlers in the West Bank. Ultra-Orthodox Jews have also come up with outreach venues attempting to bring non-observant Jews to ‘Return to Tradition’. Many have paid attention to Chabad, formerly a mystical Hasidic group, that has turned into an outreach order with thousands of Jewish evangelists. However, non-Hasidic Orthodox activists have also come to engage in evangelism, inventing outreach yeshivot. Both progressive and traditionalist Jewish feminists turned many synagogues into more egalitarian spaces, allowing women greater access to Jewish spirituality, learning, and rabbinical leadership. The Renewal movement, which came out of New-Hasidism, amalgamated Hasidic practices with the values and tastes of the counterculture. Gay congregations, women’s minyanim, secular yeshivot, and Kabbalah centers are but a few examples of the numerous new groups or venues that have come to characterize Judaism in the last generation. A category of their own, even more challenging to older definitions of Judaism, have been the new borderline communities that have attracted relatively large numbers of Jews in the last decades. Messianic Jewish congregations, Jewish Buddhists, and Hebrew Catholics amalgamate Jewish identity with practices and elements of faith that previous generations have considered incompatible with the Jewish tradition. 

The new Jewish spiritual and communal landscapes and their new or renewed movements and trends call for new examination and evaluation of the definition of Judaism in our generation and the many expressions it has taken. It is the aim of this Issue to offer an opportunity for scholars to share their explorations of these themes.

Prof. Dr. Yaakov Ariel
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

23 pages, 1308 KiB  
Article
Ideology and Attitudes toward Jews in U.S. Public Opinion: A Reconsideration
by Jeffrey E. Cohen
Religions 2024, 15(1), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010059 - 1 Jan 2024
Viewed by 1945
Abstract
Antisemitism has been found on both the extreme left and right among political elites. However, at the mass public level, limited research suggests right-wing antisemitism, but not much left-wing antisemitism. This paper challenges that research, at least for the U.S., offering an alternative [...] Read more.
Antisemitism has been found on both the extreme left and right among political elites. However, at the mass public level, limited research suggests right-wing antisemitism, but not much left-wing antisemitism. This paper challenges that research, at least for the U.S., offering an alternative theory. The theory argues that the lowest levels of antisemitism will be found among mainstream liberals and conservatives. Ideological moderates will exhibit higher rates of antisemitism, while those lacking an ideological orientation will show still higher antisemitic rates. Extremists of the right and left may be more antisemitic than mainstream conservatives and liberals, but the inability of standard ideological self-placement questions to distinguish extreme ideologues from the very conservative/liberal makes it difficult to test the extremism hypothesis. Numerous items measuring attitudes towards Jews in the U.S. across five major surveys finds overwhelming support for the mainstream philosemitism theory. The conclusion puts the findings into perspective and offers suggestions regarding future research. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop